editor
hiraethified
Bloody hell, there's a lot of legal nitpicking in there!It came through as a pdf attachment to an email.
Bloody hell, there's a lot of legal nitpicking in there!It came through as a pdf attachment to an email.
Bloody hell, there's a lot of legal nitpicking in there!
Because it's a viable, money-making business and the landlord doesn't need to sell the (listed) building.How come the Marquis of Lorne is still going? That's what astonishes me.
TaytosHow come the Marquis of Lorne is still going? That's what astonishes me.
He's already sold all his other ones (woodcock a etc round here) but does at least still run one that he lives in, in west Ken. Still the Taytos mind.Because it's a viable, money-making business and the landlord doesn't need to sell the (listed) building.
Loads of viable, money making pubs have been flogged off to developers. Thaaaaat's capitalism for you!Because it's a viable, money-making business and the landlord doesn't need to sell the (listed) building.
Hi there, I noticed yesterday there are workmen in the Grosvenor pub
in Sydney Road Stockwell and the under offer sign has come down. Any
word on what's going to happen to it? The bar is totally gutted.
Received a letter today about another planning application for The Grosvenor. A rear side extension, part 1, part 2 storeys, for five "serviced units" - is that flats?
Just to alarm you - the person behind JHD Bars seems to be James Hopkinson, whose company address is given as 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GUSo it seems that JHD Bars (who they?) want to taker over the Grosvenor if I've understood this document. Can anyone clarify?
https://planning.lambeth.gov.uk/onl...9/pdf/17_01861_FUL-HEADS_OF_TERMS-1900280.pdf
This seems to be the guy behind the venture
Online Services - Company Summary
Hamna Wakaf Ltd v London Borough of Lambeth and Another: FTTGRC 19 Jul 2016 - swarb.co.uk
Dunno but the refurb seems to be going strong when I've passed a couple of times in the last few weeksIf I've read this right, there's been another planning refusal for the Grosvenor owners. Can anyone clarify?
View attachment 115127
Is it OK to publish this letter? Or can you give me his email so I can ask?editor lefteri
Haven't had time to look up the planning appeal result, but from this CAMRA email it seems the developer has now got everything they wanted:
From: Geoff Strawbridge
Sent: 10 October, 2017 15:43
Subject: END OF THE ROAD FOR THE GROSVENOR
Rex,
Sadly predictable, three years since the pub was so thoroughly gutted that nobody was likely to pay the asking price. Equally predictable is that once they’ve got the flats occupied, as in the case of the Beehive in Crossford Street, they’ll find no takers for the ‘pub’ and eventually get Condition 3 overturned. For that matter the ground floor could foreseeably be converted to car parking for the residents above. A classic Trojan Horse con in the making and a slap in the teeth for the Planning Applications Committee which had belatedly stood firm in support of their updated pub protection policy when they realised at last what was going on all over the borough.
I think we did all we could along the way. Had the local music lovers remained passionate and vocal, there might just have been a chance. As it is, the prohibition on live music in the pub runs very much against the trend of policy towards adoption of the ‘Agent of Change’ principle. It might help if someone could tell the Planning Inspectorate about that.
Cheers!
Geoff.
Geoff Strawbridge
CAMRA Greater London Regional Director
Pubs Officer, CAMRA SW London Branch
I removed the circulation list as some were email addresses.Is it OK to publish this letter? Or can you give me his email so I can ask?
I'm fucking gutted that these scumbags destroyed a beautiful pub.
Fuck that's a thoroughly depressing readeditor lefteri
Haven't had time to look up the planning appeal result, but from this CAMRA email it seems the developer has now got everything they wanted:
From: Geoff Strawbridge
Sent: 10 October, 2017 15:43
Subject: END OF THE ROAD FOR THE GROSVENOR
Rex,
Sadly predictable, three years since the pub was so thoroughly gutted that nobody was likely to pay the asking price. Equally predictable is that once they’ve got the flats occupied, as in the case of the Beehive in Crossford Street, they’ll find no takers for the ‘pub’ and eventually get Condition 3 overturned. For that matter the ground floor could foreseeably be converted to car parking for the residents above. A classic Trojan Horse con in the making and a slap in the teeth for the Planning Applications Committee which had belatedly stood firm in support of their updated pub protection policy when they realised at last what was going on all over the borough.
I think we did all we could along the way. Had the local music lovers remained passionate and vocal, there might just have been a chance. As it is, the prohibition on live music in the pub runs very much against the trend of policy towards adoption of the ‘Agent of Change’ principle. It might help if someone could tell the Planning Inspectorate about that.
Cheers!
Geoff.
Geoff Strawbridge
CAMRA Greater London Regional Director
Pubs Officer, CAMRA SW London Branch