8ball
Decolonise colons!
There's no such thing as 'good behaviour'; it's automatic to serve half of any sentence of up to four years, now.
I thought it was about "not looking like you were imminently about to do the same thing again".
There's no such thing as 'good behaviour'; it's automatic to serve half of any sentence of up to four years, now.
Applauding people for terrorising shop workers (and the general public) with effensive weapons isn't a great look.It might all be a big joke for you but it's not for those who risk their lives standing up against the oppressive system you promote.
It's the only look he has thoApplauding people for terrorising shop workers (and the general public) with effensive weapons isn't a great look.
Obstruction of the highway contrary to section 137 of the highway act 1980I think we are completely missing the real issue here.
There is clear activity disrupting the carriageway going on there, and as any fool knows, delaying our fine commuter-heroes is worthy of a decent shoeing at least.
No, automatic, now, for shorter sentences.I thought it was about "not looking like you were imminently about to do the same thing again".
No, automatic, now, for shorter sentences.
Obstruction of the highway contrary to section 137 of the highway act 1980
What's the reasoning against cutting the bullshit and chopping the sentences in half?
So you will support the nationwide banning of private motor vehicles, which would have prevented this? For the record, I will.Applauding people for terrorising shop workers (and the general public) with effensive weapons isn't a great look.
So you will support the nationwide banning of private motor vehicles, which would have prevented this? For the record, I will.
No, because I'm not an imbecile, but knock yourself out, and don't forget to start a "ban the sledgehammer" petition while you're at it.So you will support the nationwide banning of private motor vehicles, which would have prevented this? For the record, I will.
So you think they are violent terrorists, but you will protect their right to freely use lethal weapons in public areas with children in them, and you also are fine with them getting beaten up in the street in front of children and other vulnerable people who might be traumatised.No, because I'm not an imbecile, but knock yourself out, and don't forget to start a "ban the sledgehammer" petition while you're at it.
So you will support the nationwide banning of private motor vehicles, which would have prevented this? For the record, I will.
Will I...?So you think they are violent terrorists, but you will protect their right to freely use lethal weapons in public areas with children in them, and you also are fine with them getting beaten up in the street in front of children and other vulnerable people who might be traumatised.
You already have.Will I...?
Have I...?You already have.
Please go ahead with your argument here.If only we could go back to the famously crime-free days of Victorian London.
So you think they are violent terrorists, but you will protect their right to freely use lethal weapons in public areas with children in them, and you also are fine with them getting beaten up in the street in front of children and other vulnerable people who might be traumatised.
Please go ahead with your argument here.
Essentially, that you're a fucking idiot. In which regard, you're advancing it for me.
Public perception.
It's just the same as the gun argument. Also, any true socialist would ban private cars even if they weren't lethal weapons, which they are.Not endorsing a total ban on cars isn't the same as defending their right to drive.
It's just the same as the gun argument. Also, any true socialist would ban private cars even if they weren't lethal weapons, which they are.
Think about it for a bitWhat's the reasoning against cutting the bullshit and chopping the sentences in half?
Think about it for a bit
"Behave or you'll be in here longer."Just trying to tease it out from someone with experience in the field.