It was poorly written, but it was very well made. I don't think you'd be able to tell the difference though. Your basic knowledge of film-making is nada. You can't even tell when a "funny" youtube video is a blatant fake.
Lol this from the guy that loves Avatar?
Hey I ain't the one that ponces about like a 6th form film critic loving crap like Avatar then talking down my oh so sight & sound nose at anyone who likes different films to you.
That's a good working definition of pathetic.
And pretty much every film with androids in. He's talking out of his arse. Actors/directors always seem to spout so much bullshit in interviews
You should probably look that word up in the dictionaryThat's a good working definition of pathetic.
Leaving aside the chatting with aliens, didn't they get told the wrong thing by someone on the ship? Memory of it's not great, but I have the feeling they were lied to to get them in that room. They said "where's the big bad?", were told it was west and so went east, when in actual fact they were heading straight for it.
Though from what i've read, his version was wack, until Walter Hill got his hands on the script. Many of the great things I the script were additions from Hill apparently
Lol this from the guy that loves Avatar?
20 minutes added to DVD to make us pay for it twice over.
Maybe it'll be like Apocalypse Now Redux, where suddenly everything makes sense, and then you realise that it was quite a bit better when it didn't.
Of course not, but I think it's shitty behaviour to do this sort of thing. They do it with computer games too. Can't remember how much extra I spent on DLC for the Fallout games, but it was enough.
). I'll never understand the complaints over having more options rather than less.
I am a cheapskate and only want to pay once! I think it's fine for an uncut version with more violence/sex or whatever but it I think it sucks if you have to pay again to just see something made clear that should have been clear in the first placeI quite enjoy the options of having different versions of films. Due to economics the requirements of theatrical and home video versions are quite different. For theatrical showings films have to often come in under a certain length (I think to get his R-rating Scott had to make compromises in terms of running time) and often they get edited for rating and censorship, things which aren't an issue on home video. Of course many directors cuts are redundant fiddling around, but that's fine if the original is also present, which it always almost is (and Star Wars fans are suckers anyway
