Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Didn't say what?IntoStella said:They didn't say it. You did. Their self appointed young, professional, childless spokesman.
Didn't say what?IntoStella said:They didn't say it. You did. Their self appointed young, professional, childless spokesman.
Bull. You've already said you're on nobody's side but your own. Those were your own words.Orang Utan said:FFS I'm only informing people about one point of view as I have seen it expressed in literature posted through my door - I'm not any kind of spokesman, I'm just getting sick of wilfully obtuse misrepresentation again and again.
IntoStella said:Oh come on, enough with going round and round in circles. I still can't see anything but nimbyism in your argument.
Bob said:I'd think the main reason is that the council doesn't own it - it's privately owned. So they could only buy it by offering the owner enough cash to give it up - probably a million or two.
I rest my case.Orang Utan said:Oh fuck this for a game of soldiers - your talking out of your arse, you silly woman
Calm down dear, it's only a bulletin board.Orang Utan said:Oops, I meant you're talking out of your arse! How remiss of me.
Don't fucking call me spineless just cos I disagree with you. That's a disgraceful lie.
I'm getting out before I say something rash
Blagsta said:Again, that is so loaded with assumptions based on little evidence.
www.drugscope.or.uk
www.nta.nhs.uk
are good places to start if you want to educate yourself about drug treatment
Liar - how did you work that out?IntoStella said:your antediluvian attitude towards women
*drums fingers on table*Orang Utan said:First you scream hysterically.
Rushy said:Thanks for the links (there's a typo in the drugslink one - should be ".org").
I assume it's the Harbour Project on Coldharbour Lane which you were referring to. The other locally is the Stockwell Project.
Sorry to hear that you feel my response is so loaded with assumptions. I though I had made it pretty clear that I was basing it what I have seen and experienced of Tunstall Road over a fairly long period. And that I thought lot's of others are probably doing the same.
I don't suppose that you are disagreeing with what I have seen but how I have interpreted what I have seen.
Orang Utan said:I think families worried about needles in playgrounds aren't necessarily nimbys
gabi said:I don't get that logic at all. The junkies are already there, so surely putting the treatment centre in would, if anything, reduce the number of needles lying around the neighbourhood?
Blagsta said:I'm disagreeing with the conclusions you come to. You're saying - I have seen more drug use therefore drug treatment doesn't work. Do I have to point out the idiocy in that?
Rushy said:I haven't assumed that they had done nothing to improve the situation - I said they had not *visibly* done so. My own observation over the past eight years (five of them living on Tunstall Road) is that the problem of drug related litter and faeces has increased - it is much worse than it was in 97/98. And that which is visible is what most people will be basing their objections on - and what else do you expect people to do? If there is a good reason why that should be considered an improvement no-one is really communicating it very well.
Rushy said:It seems that your prejudices are based on the same thing as everyone elses - perceptions made on what we observe around us and which are then influenced by our own limited knowledge and life experiences.
OK - assuming that the argument that it needs to be in central Brixton is correct and that no other area with excellent transport links would suffice and that multiple smaller centres would not make the service more accessible - why is Brighton Terrace the ideal location? Why not Colharbour Lane (Brixton Cycles for example) or Acre Lane (Acre House for example) or the five storey day centre on Effra Road that was recently sold at auction. I am sure it would help people to know why this very precise and clearly contentious location is so crucial and what other properties had been considered.
More importantly though, if, as Blagsta says, there are already needle exchanges / treatment centres in Brixton how is this one, which is designed to attract additional non-local users (albeit people who are trying to deal with their addiction), going to improve the problem where the others have not visibly done so. That seems to me to be a valid question?
As far as the exchange itself is concerned, I can see the benefits for the user but I don't entirely understand how having an exchange will necessarily solve the 'needles on doorsteps' problem (to which I would add faeces on doorsteps problem in my own experience). My understanding is that the centres do not allow injecting on site so needles will need to be taken away for use elsewhere. The principle of an exchange is as I understand it that the user will need to produce a used sharp to qualify for a fresh one. If they don't produce one, where do they get their sharps from? My garden is constantly being littered with both used and unused needles so they are clearly readily available without exchange.
So where's the incentive to exchange?
What happens when the user can't produce a needle to 'exchange' -are they excluded from the system and what happens to them then?
Even if users don't leave the needles lying about, they still need somewhere to shoot up and why will they stop using the same doorsteps, front gardens and alleys..?
If they still need to use doorsteps etc.. why will they not be more likley to use the steps and gardens closest to the centre?
And if the centre is attracting users from a larger catchment area, why would that behaviour not be expected to increase?
(Sorry for so many questions!)
Kiddo-Whizz said:Thanks for that. Your answer simply shows your ignorance on the subject.
Blagsta said:Errrr...
The council doesn't own the Brighton Terrace site either. And I think the owners have permission for private housing on the site. They certainly applied for it.Bob said:I'd think the main reason is that the council doesn't own it - it's privately owned. So they could only buy it by offering the owner enough cash to give it up - probably a million or two.
I think you'll find more support in "relatively wealthy" and slightly more distant Trinity Gardens than in relatively not wealthy Brighton Terrace. How do you know how much thought they've put into it? Have you talked to them? Or are you airing prejudices?gabi said:I live in Trinity Gardens, and am all in favour of the centre. I doubt most of my relatively wealthy neighbours are though. I don't they've actually put any thought into it though.
Ol Nick said:I think you'll find more support in "relatively wealthy" and slightly more distant Trinity Gardens than in relatively not wealthy Brighton Terrace. How do you know how much thought they've put into it? Have you talked to them? Or are you airing prejudices?
Rushy said:I don't claim to be a master of the Queen's english
Blagsta said:Obviously