SpookyFrank
A cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel
Do you condemn all defence solicitors?
I don't have a strict policy on this, but in general terms solicitors in the pay of terrorist organisations are not among my favourite people.
Do you condemn all defence solicitors?
My first thoughts were to condemn Finucane himself. I never mentioned his family. He was the one who dragged them into a war after all.
Same sentence, condemn the victim then his family..... You are a cunt. And yet you had to be dragged to condemn the state killing innocent men and women.......
Yet what you're actually doing is blaming him for his own murder.I think it's perfectly possible to be critical of Finucane and yet appalled at his murder.
Yet what you're actually doing is blaming him for his own murder.
I didn't mention it earlier because I thought it was kind of obvious. I've been trying to drag someone into condemming the acts committed by the IRA but so far no luck it seems.
that's perhaps the stupidest post i've seen this year. and when you consider that that's in competition with dwyer, articul8, rmp3 and so on that's pretty stupid.My first thoughts were to condemn Finucane himself. I never mentioned his family. He was the one who dragged them into a war after all.
spookyfrank said:charles manson? sharon tate should shoulder some of the responsibility for her death.
He's not entirely without responsibility for it is he?
I don't have a strict policy on this, but in general terms solicitors in the pay of terrorist organisations are not among my favourite people.
He's not entirely without responsibility for it is he?
i agree, i don't like the cps eitherI don't have a strict policy on this, but in general terms solicitors in the pay of terrorist organisations are not among my favourite people.
He is responsible because he was a solicitor?
So you would deny due process to certain groups of people?
Because he chose to defend terrorists.
Perhaps if he'd lived he'd have gone on to save many other IRA folks from jail, and they in turn might have gone on to murder lots of other folks who they wouldn't have been able to murder had they been in jail. Finucane's death may have saved a dozen lives for all we know.
Watching you lot overreact to anything outside of the acceptable opinions venn diagram you've all got in your heads is hilarious btw.
Because he chose to defend terrorists.
it's all up for gareth pierce and michael mansfield thenThe IRA did, and Finucane defended them when they did so.
if it was a civil war, how did pat finucane 'drag his family into a war'?As if there's ever 'due process' in a civil war ffs.
The IRA did, and Finucane defended them when they did so.
You a fan of drone strikes and other forms of extra-judicial killing then SpookyFrank?
Yes, as you can clearly see from all those posts where I said that.
As I already said above it's in your interests in seeing that the British state does not do political assassinations or terrorism. It's about trying to limit what your own ruling class can get away with.As if there's ever 'due process' in a civil war ffs.
As if there's ever 'due process' in a civil war ffs.
But its a war, the rules dont apply, off with his head etc.
Wanker.
The IRA didn't think the rules applied to them.
and you base this on...The IRA didn't think the rules applied to them.
and you base this on...