The human shields story is to try and disguise the fact they stormed into a house and indiscriminately shot everyone.
The human shields story is to try and disguise the fact they stormed into a house and indiscriminately shot everyone.
Thing is though, given that what likesfish says is obviously true, why were they putting out propaganda spin about 'human shields' before finding out what actually happened?
All I can think is that as politicians, they just can't help themselves.
The human shields story is to try and disguise the fact they stormed into a house and indiscriminately shot everyone.
You win this round, FWC autodidact - but we shall meet again.
The human shields story is to try and disguise the fact they stormed into a house and indiscriminately shot everyone.
made a great front page on The Sun didn't it.
no one's leaving afghanistan
Yawn!! Are we still talking about this? There is so much MORE important news going on in the world right now.
All is good on planet Earth, A prince got married and the bad guy is dead. How DISNEY is that?
I don't think so. Letting this Afghan quagmire continue into election season would be bad news for Obama. I doubt he's going to put re-election at risk for minerals scattered around an ungovernable wilderness. I'd say by next summer the US will have declared some kind of success & will largely be out of Afghan.
I think it is interesting that of all the very dramatic possible implications of this killing the one thing that is rather irrelevent is the issue of Al Qaeda itself. That organisation is in terminal decline anyway. In many ways Bin Laden was killed by a 26 year old Tunisia fruit seller called Mohamed Bouazizi. Bin Laden's death has implications for the Afghan war, for the US/Pakistan strategic relationship etc but it means little as far as the organisation he founded is concerned.
Or I wonder whether it was an individual who grassed him up, there must have still been a decent sized bounty on his head?
My understanding was that they tracked a courrier who was taking Bin Laden's audio tapes to the media. The Courrier led them to the compound.
My understanding was that they tracked a courrier who was taking Bin Laden's audio tapes to the media. The Courrier led them to the compound.
Bit of a school boy error from someone who had succesfully hid for 10 years from the biggest man hunt in history.
The courier was at Gitmo I read.
weltweit - how you're not a high-flying operative at MI6 I'll never know.
I doubt she ever inspired the tory cabinet to fly a plane into a building...
made a great front page on The Sun didn't it.
i'm sure they haven't printed a correction
eta - it might not actually have been The Sun but i remember at least one of the tabloids had a lead on using his wife as a shield
Though her bathroom cabinet went flying into a building that day in Brighton...
YES! I was waiting for someone to point this out on this thread - the Arab's 1848 has comepletely marginalised jihadists, and rendered them irrelevant and impotentI think it is interesting that of all the very dramatic possible implications of this killing the one thing that is rather irrelevent is the issue of Al Qaeda itself. That organisation is in terminal decline anyway. In many ways Bin Laden was killed by a 26 year old Tunisia fruit seller called Mohamed Bouazizi. Bin Laden's death has implications for the Afghan war, for the US/Pakistan strategic relationship etc but it means little as far as the organisation he founded is concerned.
I think we can assume whatever they tell us is a wrong un, including that bizarre hiding behind his wife stuff. Great opportunity to validate and justify Gitmo though - who could claim otherwise than they say.
I just looked at [the pictures of Americans celebrating Bin Laden's death] and realised that it would increase the likelihood of a terror attack on London. That's very much the American style but I don't think I've ever felt pleased at the death of anybody. The real problem for London is that after America we're a big target so it's a very dangerous time at the moment.
We should have captured [Bin Laden] and put him on trial. It's a simple point - are we gangsters or a Western democracy based on the rule of law? This undermines any commitment to democracy and trial by jury and makes Obama look like some sort of mobster.