Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Orca kills keeper in Seaworld, Florida - cover up in progress

What training regimes are you specifically talking about? They use clicker training at Seaworld Florida, nothing about 'breaking' IME. :eek::D

Poor whale, poor trainer, these things happen. :(

I can't recall at present as it's not my area of expertise. But certainly I was reading some studies/papers at my gf's (she's a biologist and conservationist) with cited sources into exactly how the animals at such places are trained. I will try and remember to dig them out tonight and post the links.
 
I've always been fasniated by killer whales.

Despite the fact they are ruthless hunters and eat all sorts of large creatures they've pretty much like humans and in the wild don't eat us on sight like everything else. Like a massive shark who is naturally friendly with a potential food source for some intelectual reason.

Something thats kind of boggling when you think about it.


Its not suprising though that if you enslave one and keep it cooped up in cramped conditions that the good will towards us might evaporate.
 
the reason people shouldnt be shocked in any way about this story is in the first 3 words of the headline.

(hint: its the 2nd word...)


Keep wild animals where they should be, in the wild imo.

Tbf I don't think it applies to this story with what someone said about the orca being bought as a young orca (n.b. what's the term for a baby orca?), but sometimes these animals have been rescued from the sea and then can't be released back into the wild. Or were bought in times when people thought less about this stuff, and now have been too domesticated to release. :(
 
Why did you go and see it then? Twice.

^this^

Don't mean to sound judgemental SS, you can get dragged to all sorts with kids, work etc, but if people stopped going and pumping money into these awful places, they would close down.

My mum keeps telling me I must take littleun to the zoo, she'd love it :facepalm: Errr, no thanks, she lives in England, if she wants to see lions and tigers she'll have to watch then on telly, or at a push I'd look into a safari park. There's local animal and wildlife sanctuaries that are far more hands on and she won't have to watch a beautiful creature pace up and down in a cage going slowly mental. Vile fucking places.
 
Tbf I don't think it applies to this story with what someone said about the orca being bought as a young orca (n.b. what's the term for a baby orca?), but sometimes these animals have been rescued from the sea and then can't be released back into the wild. Or were bought in times when people thought less about this stuff, and now have been too domesticated to release. :(

Doesn't mean they should be should be doing dumb arse tricks for an audience, its clearly not safe for the trainers for a start...
 
Doesn't mean they should be should be doing dumb arse tricks for an audience, its clearly not safe for the trainers for a start...
Well, when I was in Florida we visited a place that was half sea life centre and half marine animal rescue place. They had two dolphins who had been rescued and then couldn't be returned to the wild.

When we showed up they were both at one end of the pool, hardly moving and one was clutching a hoop. I know you have to be careful with putting human emotions onto animals, but there was something about it which made them look bored and depressed. Then when feeding time arrived the staff set tricks up for them as part of the process. The dolphins seemed to come alive.

Now, they might have just been doing it for the food, but there's also the likelihood that they enjoyed the stimulation too. These are highly intelligent animals, and it's very probable that they need that stimulation just as much as we would. Obviously animals should not be taken from the wild unless there's a bloody good reason, but when there is, perhaps the tricks aren't always negative.
 
If you get into a swimming pool with a killer whale enough times eventually it'll kill you. It's just probability, it's a wild intelligent creature, it's going to get pissed off with you at some point it's just that when it does it's going to fuck you up.

Tranquilizer snipers? yes please.
 
You know that's CGI, right?

EPIC FAIL :facepalm:

There's a lot of uninformed nonsense being spouted on this thread. SeaWorld do shitloads for research, conservation and education. They are world experts in marine zoology. Very often the animals that they take in are one's that would have no chance of survival in the wild. The way they are being portrayed on this thread as some sort of circus act is WAY off the mark.
 
That's funny, but it's not accurate or fair

Sorry, you mean they lead the Japanese scientific fleet in research?

Not sure why it's not fair. Seaworld is basically in the business of taking animals that should be swimming across oceans, and putting them on display in very small tanks, and training them to do tricks. It's hard not to look at that and conclude they're a bunch of bastards.
 
That's certainly true, but as Raverdrew has suggested, maybe it's worth looking a little more deeply.
 
Sorry, you mean they lead the Japanese scientific fleet in research?

Not sure why it's not fair. Seaworld is basically in the business of taking animals that should be swimming across oceans, and putting them on display in very small tanks, and training them to do tricks. It's hard not to look at that and conclude they're a bunch of bastards.

A bunch of bastards that have been funding conservation and breeding programs for over 40 years.
 
What training regimes are you specifically talking about? They use clicker training at Seaworld Florida, nothing about 'breaking' IME. :eek::D

Poor whale, poor trainer, these things happen. :(


tbh whilst i am not a fan of keeping wild animals in captivity sea world have very much been at the forefront of development positive training methods such as clicker and target training
 
When I saw the orcas in san diego there were a couple of nuns in front of me. Looked like they'd come dressed up in sympathy.

Well I thought it was funny.
 
That's certainly true, but as Raverdrew has suggested, maybe it's worth looking a little more deeply.

I'll happily look into things a bit more deeply, but would appreciate a few pointers into what I'm meant to be checking out.

Far as I can see, they're an amusement park company, owned by a private equity corporation, who make their money through aquatic zoos. If you can find any sealife organisation who reckons putting a killer whale into a small tank is a nice thing to do, please advise, but otherwise it appears that they're in the business of bastardry, which they then try to make all nice by also doing some research. Correct me if I'm wrong, but when people have decided to experiment on caged humans, it's not been seen as a fair excuse?
 
A bunch of bastards that have been funding conservation and breeding programs for over 40 years.

Both the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society and the World Society for the Protection of Animals have been critical of Sea World, so it looks like not all conservationists would agree...
 
A bunch of bastards that have been funding conservation and breeding programs for over 40 years.

That still leaves them as a bunch of bastards. Just ones who a) need a breeding program to replace their exhibits and b) need a bit of good publicity to answer the various groups criticising them.
 
They have good PR, that's all. They bloody well should be doing some good work, but that's not a free pass to do the shit stuff. Whales should not be kept in swimming pools.
 
I'm certainly not going to defend Sea World per se; certainly whales should not be kept in swimming pools.

I'd start by looking at the qualifications and background of the killed handler. She really is not the sort of woman who'd've kept a dancing bear.
 
Her skills have nothing to do with the ethics of her job. There are plenty of excellent scientists doing dubious work for money.
 
A brief history of the business of keeping whales and dolphins for entertainment

http://www.iridescent-publishing.com/rtm/ch1p6.htm

for those who are interested enough to read a chapter of a book

edited

sorry this is the chapter re cetaceans in the UK, plus there's a bit about Nutkins

##http://www.iridescent-publishing.com/rtm/ch5p2.htm

FWIW the conservation argument is just a lie that is prevalent amongst businesses that keep animals for the purposes of entertainment, the conservation of "endangered" white lions and tigers (in fact not endangered at all, as they are a mutation not a subspecies) being the most notorious example.
 
A bunch of bastards that have been funding conservation and breeding programs for over 40 years.
Which to me it looks a bit like tobacco companies donating money to cancer charities.

Funding conservation is undboutedly good. Keeping 7-ton whales in glorified fish tanks performing tricks for tourists is not. Make no mistake as to what the primary objective and mission of the company is.
 
I am not surprised this has happened. We have seen that show twice and it's really wrong that these huge things are being kept to perform like this.
They are beautiful creatures but they should not be used for entertainment IMO. When we were there in 2003 one of them went a bit nuts and they had to isolate him in a tank at the side of the arena.

So why did you go back a second time? :confused:
Hopefully one day all zoos & attractions such as this will no longer exist.
 
Back
Top Bottom