gentlegreen said:At the end of the day the only music you can really dance to is house
gentlegreen said:At the end of the day the only music you can really dance to is house
"White Protestant of Anglo-Saxon ancestry" ?rich! said:You are a WASP, and I claim my £5.
Yep - vocals are usually a let-down - Orbital to me wasn't too much of a jump from Bach, Miles Davis or King Tubby whereas a "rock chick" I briefly shared the scene with 10 years ago found instrumental music per se quite novel.richtea said:Orbital of course.
Underworld were kind of OK, apart from the fucking vocals, jesus
888 said:More like the only music you can't dance to, tedious 4:4 crap.
Completely agreeMagneze said:The first Underworld album is awesome. The rest ... average at best.
Don't mind vocals in dance music at all, just not Karl Hyde droning on and on..gentlegreen said:Yep - vocals are usually a let-down - Orbital to me wasn't too much of a jump from Bach, Miles Davis or King Tubby whereas a "rock chick" I briefly shared the scene with 10 years ago found instrumental music per se quite novel.
beesonthewhatnow said:I disagree - Orbital sets always seemed a bit, well, plodding, to me. Underworld sets rattled along at a million miles an hour and made me want to dance till I dropped.
They were technically brilliant as well - a wholey electronic act with no setlist, improvising stuff as they went along.
I think that just about says it really.Onket said:Underworld =
but
Orbital =
Firky said:They also sound too close to James Lavelle (who has done one good album, psyence fiction).
Firky said:You can imagine Santa's elves listening to it.