While this is true, the South Africa numbers are far from worthless. For starters, SA numbers for omicron can be compared with SA numbers for previous waves. The difference is startling thus far - case fatality rates falling from around 3% to around 0.5% within the same population (and a significant chunk of that 0.5% are delta infections).
We've all been waiting to see if South Africa goes pear-shaped with omicron over the last three weeks. It still hasn't happened. Yes, SA has a very high number of people previously infected with other variants, but so does the UK, and the UK has far higher vaccination among the high-risk groups. SA's daily covid deaths are still only around 30 per day, which, with a population about the same size as the UK's, is way lower than the UK's rate at any point since July. There are reporting issues of course, but the excess death data released on Wednesday showed SA's excess deaths running a little up, but only a little.
There is a strong pattern here that SA sees excess deaths go up before reported covid deaths in each wave, but each week that goes by without this happening significantly adds to the evidence pool suggesting that this wave is something very different. Add to that the reports from the ground about the different nature of infection, oxygen needs etc.
View attachment 301278
https://www.samrc.ac.za/reports/report-weekly-deaths-south-africa
Something that I'm surprised hasn't been picked up on more widely is this study published in pre-print last week suggesting that omicron has become more infectious by nicking some DNA from a cold virus inside someone (probably an HIV-infected person) infected with both. That does provide a decent explanation both for the much higher infectiousness and the milder symptoms. It may be wrong, of course, but it makes sense as a mechanism by which it has become, as the study says, 'more human'.
Omicron may have acquired a mutation from common cold virus, say researchers