Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Olympic Track & Field - aka Athletics thread

Christina, you are an absolute star. Miss Consistency in major tournaments, which is very un-British, frankly.

There is no evidence that she ever took anything. The testing procedures are ridiculous. You have to say months in advance where you'll be and then when the day comes that you said you'd be at such-and-such outdoor track and it is pissing down, so you go to an indoor track instead, that's when the bastards turn up at the outdoor track. I'd like to see anybody manage to avoid ever making mistakes under that system.
 
Served her 1 year ban for missing three tests, that's the end of it.

Worked her arse off to be the best and it's paid off.
 
I really don't think that missing drugs tests, unacceptable and reprehensible though it is, can be equated with being caught with drugs in your system.
That's why drug cheats miss tests though, init - they get off lightly.

It's also why many think the penalty for missing should be the same as for failing.
 
She has never tested positive for drugs. Now let's just celebrate her gold medal :)

This is from an article in The Times

"Ohuruogu was banned from all competition by UK Athletics (UKA) for a year, in accordance with IAAF rules, after missing the three drug tests. However, Ed Warner, the UKA chairman, sent a letter of support to the appeal panel stating that Ohuruogu had never failed a test. Indeed, Ohuruogu was tested only three days after the third and decisive missed test in July 2006."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/more_sport/athletics/article2953346.ece
 
That's why drug cheats miss tests though, init - they get off lightly.

It's also why many think the penalty for missing should be the same as for failing.
You are wrong in this instance. Im way harsh on cheats, but even UK Athletics supported Christine.
UK Athletics ruled that Ohuruogu had contravened these rules, but added it was "a minor, unintentional infraction..
 
UK Athletics ruled that Ohuruogu had contravened these rules, but added it was "a minor, unintentional infraction..
Which test was "a minor, unintentional infraction" the first one she missed, the second one she missed, or the third one?
 
Everybody's doin' it, doin' it, doin it!

:hmm:

:rolleyes:

:mad:



Victor Conte, the mastermind behind the BALCO steroid scandal, met with former WADA chairman Dick Pound in December to share inside information on athletes' doping practice. Conte believes more out-of-competition testing is needed to help curtail use of illegal performance-enchancing drugs.

On December 12, 2007, I advised WADA's Dick Pound to routinely send disguised drug testers to Jamaica, and to begin doing so immediately. I had received information about a specific drug supplier - WADA received this person's name, address and phone number - who was allegedly working with elite track athletes. I also explained to Pound the importance of "offseason" testing and that testing at competitions is ineffective. The offseason is when athletes use anabolic steroids in conjunction with intensive weight training and develop the explosive strength base that serves them throughout the competitive season.

However, Pound stepped down as the Chairman of WADA just two weeks after our meeting. It now seems that others working with WADA, who actually conduct investigations and provide drug testing, have failed to act upon the information.

I have no evidence of doping by any of the winners of medals in Beijing, but when times begin falling like rain, questions arise, especially when the record-setters are from countries such as Jamaica and other Caribbean nations where there is no independent anti-doping federation. In the women's 100 meters, for instance, four of the eight finalists in the event were from such countries. Jamaican women swept all three Olympic medals: Shelly-Ann Frasier's winning time of 10.78 seconds is blazing fast, and reflects a drop from a best of 11.31 in 2007 to 10.78 in 2008, an improvement of more than five-tenths of a second in a single year and about five meters faster than before.

Jamaica's Usain Bolt won the men's 100-meter gold medal in a shocking world-record time of 9.69, which is almost unbelievable since he shut it down before the finish line. Richard Thompson from Trinidad and Tobango won the silver medal in a personal best time of 9.89. Once again, five out of the eight finalists in the men's 100-meter race were from an area where there is minimal out-of-season testing: five-of-six 100-meter medals were won by athletes from Caribbean countries without independent anti-doping federations.

Again, I have no knowledge that these individuals were involved in wrongdoing. All I know is that they and other athletes come from regions where minimal offseason testing is administered.

My message to Pound was based on the simple premise of doping in combination with strength training during the offseason. Here's how it works:

The IAAF - track's governing body - claims to rarely collect offseason samples for drug testing in Caribbean countries, mainly collecting out-of-competition (OOC) samples between competitions during the European track circuit from May until September of each year. In my opinion, this is basically a waste of funds and the same as in-competition testing because there is no routine offseason testing from October to January, when athletes who are cheating use steroids in combination with intensive weight training.

Testing at competitions - and in between - is flawed because athletes who are using drugs have already tapered off. The IOC claims to be doing 4,500 tests in Beijing, but there have been only a handful of positives. In 2007, at the World Track and Field Championships in Osaka, Japan they did more than 1,000 drug tests and had zero positives. The testers are basically wasting their money. Testing at competitions is more about propaganda. They should spend at least 50% of the available funds doing offseason testing on the home soil of targeted athletes, such as those in the Caribbean who are winning all the medals.

There is a desperate need for each of the Caribbean countries to have an independent and fully functioning anti-doping federation. Until that is the case, the sprinters from these countries are going to continue to be under a cloud of suspicion.

I believe that these athletes need to be frequently drug tested on a random basis during the offseason, so that the cloud of suspicion can begin to move on. It's my opinion that more effective drug testing in the Caribbean will help to restore the credibility of entire sport of track and field.



http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/2008olympics/2008/08/18/2008-08-18_conte_world_antidoping_agency_needs_to_b.html?page=0


:(


Woof
 
Which test was "a minor, unintentional infraction" the first one she missed, the second one she missed, or the third one?
You're being moany for the sake of it.

She missed 3 tests over 18 months. She was poorly advised by the authorities to begin with. LC, if she were doping, she'd be a moron to deliberately dodge 3 tests Red flag much?

And has been mentioned, tests taken shortly before and after the missed tests were negative and suggest strongly that she had not done anything illegal.

As well as UK Athletics supporting her, a quick google shows that even Dick Pound World Anti-Doping Agency chief said "her offence should not result in a lifetime Olympic ban."



E2a- How many Brits in the crowd?! Everyone is singing! W00t! :D:D
 
Back
Top Bottom