dilute micro
esse quam videri
That second paragraph you posted not at all optimistic then? Did you read it before posting, or were you just fixated on the first part?
Yeah he's talking about a hypothetical 'horizontal' action.
That second paragraph you posted not at all optimistic then? Did you read it before posting, or were you just fixated on the first part?
Yeah he's talking about a hypothetical 'horizontal' action.
So you don't think this movement will ever take a platform?
Glenn Beck thinks it will. Do you disagree because Beck said it?
Begging the question again, I see. Seriously though, do you have an obsessive-compulsive disorder?
Meanwhile, Bank of America report third quarter gains of $6.2 billion. Next month they will start charging customers $5 per month for use of debit cards. BoA CEO said the bank "has a right to make a profit".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/18/bank-of-america-earnings-report_n_1017153.html
They got paid to go to Antarctica and pose as scientists.
Speaking as a long-time science groupie, I'd say that scientists are sexy, even when they're bald and pudgy.
You're missing the point.
That's because you live in the nebraska territory where there aren't any scientists.
Bah! I'll have you know that our scientists invented the Chicken Mcnugget!
NYPD PWNED!
So there is honour in hurting people, just as long as they are not 'American',
I don't mind if they make a profit. It's making a profit by lying and screwing people that I have an issue with.
You're not up to speed on capitalism are you?
I admit that I'm naive enough to think its possible to pay an honest wage, make a reliable and useful product, sell it at an honest price, and make an honest profit. It's little "c" capitalism, rather than big "C" Capitalism.
Most of what the banks do doesn't fall under that definition.
It is possible to pay an honest wage, its just that under capitalism that is very often a losing strategy. The dynamic is always away from this.
It is possible to pay an honest wage, its just that under capitalism that is very often a losing strategy. The dynamic is always away from this.
There's a difference between "Big C" Capitalism - the economic system, and "Small C" capitalism - the act of running a small business.
I suppose for an avowed socialist/marxist/wotever it doesn't matter - as long as surplus value is extracted by owners of the MOP there is exploitation going on. Unless the owners of the MOP are the labourers of course.
This is exactly it. A free market, like a street market selling vegetables and household goods is very different from middle-men in the Asset backed securities trade. One is transparent and efficient. The other is a continuous attempt to rig the market, based on massive differences in socially aquired information.