I don't see why people are complaining that Sky & the BBC etc are blaming anarchists, there were after all Anarchist A's being graffiti and Black and Red flags being waved. It seems a reasonable deduction to make.
Miners Strike = Violence and civil disobediance = no change of government policy
Gurka right to stay = peacefull = Change of government policy
Anti-ID card campaign = peacefull = Change of government policy
June 18th = Violence and civil disobediance = no change of policy
Having seen how pointless peaceful protest was in 2003, it just makes sense.
Even my mum wishes she had scrapped with the police and looted on that big march back then.
I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
I don't see why people are complaining that Sky & the BBC etc are blaming anarchists, there were after all Anarchist A's being graffiti and Black and Red flags being waved. It seems a reasonable deduction to make.
I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
So your Mum aspires to be a thief. How nice for you.
what about fash? or what about if we were in an actual, serious revolutionary situation?Wanting someone dead as a result of their beliefs though is as dark as you like, be it from a right wing, centrist or left wing perspective.
you mean, like Philip "schmutter" Green the govt adviser did, er no, wait, hang on a minute....I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
i wouldn't have even known anything was going on if there was only some chants and banners. your fire setters etc did a great job.I'm strongly opposed to such a drastic rise in fees, but I got that accross with chants and banners, not smashing up buildings, abusing police officers who were only doing their job, or setting fires all over London.
Never thought I'd see the day where I pretty much agreed with everything written by a student class war group! But I have to say most of that was spot on
Has anything been done across anti-cuts groups to establish any kind of legal/financial/practical support group/funds for anyone nicked yesterday/going ahead ?
Not only important from the practical point of view of individuals concerned, but also to prevent this being driven into a single issue/narrow focus type thing around students - as butchers mentioned earlier - the awareness of a lot of students of the wider picture has been pretty impressive, ditto their distancing from the NUS as a mediating/controlling body - both these things seem to have taken a lot of us, rather pleasantly, by surprise - so it would seem appropriate to show as much support as possible to those doing what we all thought would never be done. Any 'them and us' that develops should squarely have pricks like porter in the them camp, rather than 'students' in general as 'them'
Ideally solidarity actions shouldn't be contained to just coming from students (and even less the institutional student unions) per the request from the leeds class war student, but spread out across the wider anti-cuts 'movement' to keep the thing focussed on what it's about
I guess they pay VAT on Rizzla and Cider.
I think the trouble yesterday will have hurt the students case. If they expect other people to pay for their education they need to argue there the net benefit of having lot's of graduates in society is worth paying for education out of general taxation.
Scenes of kids with odd haircuts waving Iphones about and smashing up buildings will not do them any good.
She is a great role model.
So do you think that unless someone pays tax you they have no legitimate right to have a say in how the country is run?I wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?
So do you think that unless someone pays tax you they have no legitimate right to have a say in how the country is run?
No, but there badly needs to be something like this, and there's the problem. The main national anti-cuts grouping - simply by dint of having got there first - is CoR, which unfortunately now looks like being another swappie frontjob, plus a few token Left Figureheads (Benn, Corbyn, Lucas, serwotka, Mcdonnell...), and going to their Whitehall rally did little to dispel this, as I stood listening to the usual rhetoric-by-numbers (the speaker who made the biggest impression on me was a 17-year-old 'A' level student, so draw your own conclusions). My group's a member, but i'd rather not leave that sort of thing to CoR.Has anything been done across anti-cuts groups to establish any kind of legal/financial/practical support group/funds for anyone nicked yesterday/going ahead ?
sorry, but only someone under Tory indoctrination could come up with this ridiculous conformist crap. The people who will be most 'alienated' by yesterday (smug tory suits in the Home Counties) are simply not on our side anyway, and their support isn't worth having, and never has been. What possibly could the Studes lose by having such people tutting into their G&Ts? Parents up and down the country seeing their kids saddled with such crippling debts will see it differently.I guess they pay VAT on Rizzla and Cider.
I think the trouble yesterday will have hurt the student's case. If they expect other people to pay for their education they need to argue the net benefit to society is worth paying for it out of general education. For a long time they have allowed the debate to be framed in terms of individual benefit from education in terms of salary. Whilst the debate stays framed in those arguments they will lose.
Scenes of kids with odd haircuts waving Iphones about and smashing up buildings will not do them any good.
A combination of "peaceful protest" and reasonable lobbying over the last 20 years has seen HE students go from zero fees and full grants to 9000 grand fees and 20 odd k of debt.
please in future engage brain before postingI wonder how many of those Anarchists have ever paid any tax ?