Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Niche left candidates thread

Those two are apparently the only candidates who actually live in the constituency, if the local report I read was accurate 😳
 
Those two are apparently the only candidates who actually live in the constituency, if the local report I read was accurate 😳
Pretty sure Diane and the Green live in Hackney tho.
Remember them from either the last or the one before election . Superb .
76 votes last time. Molecular politics indeed. (My first Deleuze joke. :D )
 
Turns out they're standing in 5 seats, which is pretty impressive for such a tiny sect. I suppose that Gaddaffi money must pay for a lot of lost deposits.
Well seeing as he died quite a while ago it’s prob the Redgrave/ Equity wills that are keeping them afloat
 
Well, I wouldn't say it was a great result for Clifford, but the Communist League was only 4% away from beating Reform, and just over 5% away from beating the Tories:
1720212533790.png
Which is now making me wonder what the worst tory result was, are there any Conservative lost deposits anywhere? Marsanu's wasn't far off.
 
I think it’s a stretch to call this one “left”, but the niche. There is so much niche.


I would hazard a guess that Mr Nichey Ubermentalist did not, repeat not, run his leaflet past a proofreader.

Indeed, I'm somewhat sceptical that he wrote, typed or even crayoned anything down at all - it fair hums with the vibrancy of a lunatic wearing out his favourite free (ad-supported) voice-to-text app.
 
I think we're starting to stretch the definition of "left" a bit far here.
I'd agree that in terms of the way that many adherents of "the left" prefer to think of themselves it "doesn't make sense" to class the SDP or the WPB as "left" parties. But I'd argue the problem is precisely the way some of "the left" prefers to think about itself.

The fact is that all of the ideas the SDP and the WPB espouse can be widely found inside different elements of "the left". There are lots of "left-wing" people who dream of a blend of so-called "social democratic economic policies" and "cultural conservatism". "Cultural conservatism" doesn't merely, or even necessarily, involve overt or covert appeals to populist bigotries. It involves adherence to forms of economic and political nationalism, and to forms of "social ethics" often based on adherence to one of the religious traditions. (Sometimes the "politico-religious" traditions).

The major reason these tiny groupings don't pull in more of their fellow thinkers inside "the left" is not ideological. It's that they don't appear to be credible political vehicles.

And there is nothing new about these types of political formation. We appear to be in a period of political flux. Look back at the period of political flux before and just after WW1. In the 1918 general election the National Democratic and Labour Party, a very short lived political party derived from the pro-war split in the BSP, won ten seats in Parliament. Look at enormously influential figures like Robert Blatchford. Or the militantly 'anti-alien' elements in the trade unions. Or the nationalist and socially-conservative elements of the larger socialist parties. Or the left eugenicists. Or the left imperialists. And so on.
 
I'd agree that in terms of the way that many adherents of "the left" prefer to think of themselves it "doesn't make sense" to class the SDP or the WPB as "left" parties. But I'd argue the problem is precisely the way some of "the left" prefers to think about itself.

The fact is that all of the ideas the SDP and the WPB espouse can be widely found inside different elements of "the left". There are lots of "left-wing" people who dream of a blend of so-called "social democratic economic policies" and "cultural conservatism". "Cultural conservatism" doesn't merely, or even necessarily, involve overt or covert appeals to populist bigotries. It involves adherence to forms of economic and political nationalism, and to forms of "social ethics" often based on adherence to one of the religious traditions. (Sometimes the "politico-religious" traditions).

The major reason these tiny groupings don't pull in more of their fellow thinkers inside "the left" is not ideological. It's that they don't appear to be credible political vehicles.

And there is nothing new about these types of political formation. We appear to be in a period of political flux. Look back at the period of political flux before and just after WW1. In the 1918 general election the National Democratic and Labour Party, a very short lived political party derived from the pro-war split in the BSP, won ten seats in Parliament. Look at enormously influential figures like Robert Blatchford. Or the militantly 'anti-alien' elements in the trade unions. Or the nationalist and socially-conservative elements of the larger socialist parties. Or the left eugenicists. Or the left imperialists. And so on.
General point taken, and if you'd just posted something about the WPB I probably wouldn't have bothered saying anything. I wouldn't have thought the SDP as having any kind of "left" appeal in the same way, but then tbh they're not really on my radar that often.
 
Oh, look who has backed Maxine Bowler. No great surprise seeing as how supportive she was to him.

View attachment 431569


I completely forgot about this result.

Michael Lavalette came 2nd in preston, wasn't too far off the combined Tory and Reform vote either.

I belive he left the SWP at some point, bit odd after staying loyal through all the Martin Smith stuff.


 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom