savoloysam
Pigman's pigman's ha ha charade you are..
Currently watching and thoroughly enjoying Ancient Apocalypse as I have done with the majority of stuff I've watched with Graham Hancock in.
Currently watching and thoroughly enjoying Ancient Apocalypse as I have done with the majority of stuff I've watched with Graham Hancock in.
It's had a massive slap for being compleatly inaccurate. It should not be presented as a serious scientific documentary study because it ignores actual inconvenient facts (for the theories he is trying to present) from actual archaeologists and scientists. Basically it's a load of sensationalised cherry picked pseudo-scientific bollocks.
. . .but anyone who is aware of Graham Hancocks work should already be aware of this.
In fact he claims to be proud of this fact. Actual Archaeologists and scientists have totally shot down his 'theories' (Not theory in the scientific meaning of the word in this case).He neither claims to be an archaeologist or a scientists.
He has been told they are totally wrong and why they are wrong but chose to ignore this information in his shows and books. . . doesn't sell books I guess.He also claims that these are his theories and he's open to the fact he may wrong.
From watching only the bits he chooses to present I suppose that's possible. . . but they aren't.I found his theories in these series quite plausible actually
Which is why he does this and ignores the bits that show it's all bollocks.and certain very interesting for the most part.
Quite possibly but Graham Hancock isn't helping to uncover any more of it.As much as we would like to think we do, there's a lot more to human history than we think we know.
Would you like to buy a bridge?He neither claims to be an archaeologist or a scientists. He also claims that these are his theories and he's open to the fact he may wrong. I found his theories in these series quite plausible actually and certain very interesting for the most part. As much as we would like to think we do, there's a lot more to human history than we think we know.
According to an archaeologist friend, 'This is what happens when a child reads von Daniken before learning science and critical thinking'.You mean like the archaeologists of America who refused to substantiate their claims against him, or the ones in The Guardian who called the show "Full of racism" or the list of archaeologist that have so far refused or declined the chance to debate his theories in a live all expenses paid debate (because he's is open to debate his findings, while they are not) or the people that wanted the show banned because "it is the most dangerous on Netflix"
Jog on!
You what? I didn't hear about any of those actually. He has been doing this for years in his articles and books etc long before this recent neflix nonsense. He is called out every time. He never checks in with the actual facts if they get in the way of the story he is trying to sell. Or rather he does check, he just omits anything that fucks up the validity of his claims. . . which is generally quite a lot.You mean like the archaeologists of America who refused to substantiate their claims against him, or the ones in The Guardian who called the show "Full of racism" or the list of archaeologist that have so far refused or declined the chance to debate his theories in a live all expenses paid debate (because he's is open to debate his findings, while they are not) or the people that wanted the show banned because "it is the most dangerous on Netflix"
Jog on!
BE interested to know what they do next, looks like they spunked a large part of might sensibly be season two in the last episode of season one.Alice in Borderland is back!
Haven't seen it yet, it's on my 'to watch' list. It's got Omar Sy in it, the French comedian who also starred in Lupin. He's very good.Surprised Intouchables hasn't had a mention.
A paraplegic French aristocrat becomes friends with his Senegalese immigrant hardman carer.
Funny as fuck in places and very touching. Based on real events.
I know I’ve watched that one, but can’t remember a single thing about it! I’d better rewatch the end of season 1 before I dive into the new one.Alice in Borderland is back!
Just watched it. It definitely loses momentum after the first reveal, with a lot of backfilling to do to get back up to speed. And the characters were all a lot of fun, but not as tightly interwoven as the knives out set. But knives out was some sort of miracle of tight plotting. A very high bar to be measured against and no shame in coming in under it. Laugh out loud funny in places. Good fun.So, did anyone watch Glass Onion?
A bit of fun, I thought, but nowhere near as good as Knives Out.
Daniel Craig has definitely beaten the typecasting problem. He may end up being remembered more for Benoit Blanc than Bond.
Been watching Top Boy Summerhouse, its quite something. Have watched four episdoes tonight. Gonna continue watching tomorrow.
Top Boy Summerhouse was originally called Top Boy.And the follow up shows, confusingly just called Top Boy are also on
Top Boy Summerhouse was originally called Top Boy.
Then they decided to make the sequel series and call it Top Boy. As it was a continuation I've no idea why it couldn't just have the same name.
So much for boycotting and/ or disliking anything I give a firm recommendation forSaw the first episode of Wednesday, and though I enjoyed it, i doubt I have time to watch 7 more of the same. It looks great though.
Your opinion on the series is clearly of so little importance to me that I forget what you have recommended.So much for boycotting and/ or disliking anything I give a firm recommendation for
That not only doesn’t make much sense, but also proves that contrary to your claims you do like some of the same stuff I do. And you can also include Glass Onion, incidentally.Your opinion on the series is clearly of so little importance to me that I forget what you have recommended.
Not really. I just don’t rate anyone’s recommendations much, just enjoying mocking yours. I also don't remember what a stranger said on the internet when I’m looking for something to watch.That not only doesn’t make much sense, but also proves that contrary to your claims you do like some of the same stuff I do. And you can also include Glass Onion, incidentally.
It seems to me you should stop lying to yourself and abandon yourself to my film and TV recommendations
Each to their own. If it makes you happy, go for it, and damn the inconsistency .Not really. I just don’t rate anyone’s recommendations much, just enjoying mocking yours. I also remember what a stranger said on the internet when I’m looking for something to watch.
no inconsistency except what you percieveEach to their own. If it makes you happy, go for it, and damn the inconsistency .