Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Netflix recommendations

Currently watching and thoroughly enjoying Ancient Apocalypse as I have done with the majority of stuff I've watched with Graham Hancock in.
 
Currently watching and thoroughly enjoying Ancient Apocalypse as I have done with the majority of stuff I've watched with Graham Hancock in.

It's had a massive slap for being compleatly inaccurate. It should not be presented as a serious scientific documentary study because it ignores actual inconvenient facts (for the theories he is trying to present) from actual archaeologists and scientists. Basically it's a load of sensationalised cherry picked pseudo-scientific bollocks.
. . .but anyone who is aware of Graham Hancocks work should already be aware of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chz
It's had a massive slap for being compleatly inaccurate. It should not be presented as a serious scientific documentary study because it ignores actual inconvenient facts (for the theories he is trying to present) from actual archaeologists and scientists. Basically it's a load of sensationalised cherry picked pseudo-scientific bollocks.
. . .but anyone who is aware of Graham Hancocks work should already be aware of this.

He neither claims to be an archaeologist or a scientists. He also claims that these are his theories and he's open to the fact he may wrong. I found his theories in these series quite plausible actually and certain very interesting for the most part. As much as we would like to think we do, there's a lot more to human history than we think we know.
 
He neither claims to be an archaeologist or a scientists.
In fact he claims to be proud of this fact. Actual Archaeologists and scientists have totally shot down his 'theories' (Not theory in the scientific meaning of the word in this case).
He also claims that these are his theories and he's open to the fact he may wrong.
He has been told they are totally wrong and why they are wrong but chose to ignore this information in his shows and books. . . doesn't sell books I guess.
I found his theories in these series quite plausible actually
From watching only the bits he chooses to present I suppose that's possible. . . but they aren't.
and certain very interesting for the most part.
Which is why he does this and ignores the bits that show it's all bollocks.
As much as we would like to think we do, there's a lot more to human history than we think we know.
Quite possibly but Graham Hancock isn't helping to uncover any more of it.
 
You mean like the archaeologists of America who refused to substantiate their claims against him, or the ones in The Guardian who called the show "Full of racism" or the list of archaeologist that have so far refused or declined the chance to debate his theories in a live all expenses paid debate (because he's is open to debate his findings, while they are not) or the people that wanted the show banned because "it is the most dangerous on Netflix"

Jog on!
 
He neither claims to be an archaeologist or a scientists. He also claims that these are his theories and he's open to the fact he may wrong. I found his theories in these series quite plausible actually and certain very interesting for the most part. As much as we would like to think we do, there's a lot more to human history than we think we know.
Would you like to buy a bridge?
 
You mean like the archaeologists of America who refused to substantiate their claims against him, or the ones in The Guardian who called the show "Full of racism" or the list of archaeologist that have so far refused or declined the chance to debate his theories in a live all expenses paid debate (because he's is open to debate his findings, while they are not) or the people that wanted the show banned because "it is the most dangerous on Netflix"

Jog on!
According to an archaeologist friend, 'This is what happens when a child reads von Daniken before learning science and critical thinking'. :D
 
Last edited:
You mean like the archaeologists of America who refused to substantiate their claims against him, or the ones in The Guardian who called the show "Full of racism" or the list of archaeologist that have so far refused or declined the chance to debate his theories in a live all expenses paid debate (because he's is open to debate his findings, while they are not) or the people that wanted the show banned because "it is the most dangerous on Netflix"

Jog on!
You what? I didn't hear about any of those actually. He has been doing this for years in his articles and books etc long before this recent neflix nonsense. He is called out every time. He never checks in with the actual facts if they get in the way of the story he is trying to sell. Or rather he does check, he just omits anything that fucks up the validity of his claims. . . which is generally quite a lot.

You have obviously gone all in on it, so I doubt there is any chance you'll bother checking for yourself.
 
Last edited:
I bloody loved Chariots of the Gods and was so disappointed when told it was all absolute bollocks.

I might watch this thing. It sounds like fun.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sue
Surprised Intouchables hasn't had a mention.

A paraplegic French aristocrat becomes friends with his Senegalese immigrant hardman carer.

Funny as fuck in places and very touching. Based on real events.
Haven't seen it yet, it's on my 'to watch' list. It's got Omar Sy in it, the French comedian who also starred in Lupin. He's very good.
 
So, did anyone watch Glass Onion?

A bit of fun, I thought, but nowhere near as good as Knives Out.

Daniel Craig has definitely beaten the typecasting problem. He may end up being remembered more for Benoit Blanc than Bond.
 
So, did anyone watch Glass Onion?

A bit of fun, I thought, but nowhere near as good as Knives Out.

Daniel Craig has definitely beaten the typecasting problem. He may end up being remembered more for Benoit Blanc than Bond.
Just watched it. It definitely loses momentum after the first reveal, with a lot of backfilling to do to get back up to speed. And the characters were all a lot of fun, but not as tightly interwoven as the knives out set. But knives out was some sort of miracle of tight plotting. A very high bar to be measured against and no shame in coming in under it. Laugh out loud funny in places. Good fun.
 
The Glass Onion is ok. It’s a bit of a mess, but passes the time. Falling for Xmas is ok if you can overlook the casual homophobia implying her influencer boyfriend is actually gay.
 
Top Boy Summerhouse was originally called Top Boy.

Then they decided to make the sequel series and call it Top Boy. As it was a continuation I've no idea why it couldn't just have the same name.

Think it was because the first were on C4 and netfllix wanted to make it clear which they had produced. Just adds confusion though.
 
Saw the first episode of Wednesday, and though I enjoyed it, i doubt I have time to watch 7 more of the same. It looks great though.
 
Your opinion on the series is clearly of so little importance to me that I forget what you have recommended.
That not only doesn’t make much sense, but also proves that contrary to your claims you do like some of the same stuff I do. And you can also include Glass Onion, incidentally.

It seems to me you should stop lying to yourself and abandon yourself to my film and TV recommendations :thumbs:
 
I didn’t rate Knives Out: Glass Onion much. I thought it was going to be an interesting twist on “And Then There Were None” with the island setting but really it didn’t quite deliver. I liked the performance of Janelle Monae though
 
That not only doesn’t make much sense, but also proves that contrary to your claims you do like some of the same stuff I do. And you can also include Glass Onion, incidentally.

It seems to me you should stop lying to yourself and abandon yourself to my film and TV recommendations :thumbs:
Not really. I just don’t rate anyone’s recommendations much, just enjoying mocking yours. I also don't remember what a stranger said on the internet when I’m looking for something to watch.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom