ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
I was only born in 73 I probably wasn't watching TV until the late 70s/early 80sRepeated in the mid 70s, iirc
I was only born in 73 I probably wasn't watching TV until the late 70s/early 80sRepeated in the mid 70s, iirc
stick with it, the first 10 minutes need some acclimatising to work out the tone, but once you get into it its specialOoh! That looks great, have added it to my list. Thanks ska invita
Sweet Tooth is so charming. I've watched five episodes so far. The boy who plays the main character is so good. And Adeel Akhtar is in it too - he played Wilson Wilson in Utopia, which was really good too.
Cowboy Bebop's dub is pretty good, but that's the only pre-2000 series I can think of. (and just mentioning it means I have to go and watch the opening credits on YT again) In films, Princess Mononoke wasn't too awful but that's a high-budget Disney import so you'd expect it to be half-decent.
I'm not really into fantasy stuff, but this is quite charming.Will I like Sweet Tooth if I'm not into all the other popular fantasy type stuff like Ragnarok?
I wish I’d thought it was creepy. TBF, my opinion of it has improved since I first saw it.Midsommar
Creepy as fuck.
I wish I’d thought it was creepy. TBF, my opinion of it has improved since I first saw it.
I was initially very disappointed with it, after loving the director’s superb previous film Hereditary, which was a proper horror film and then some, and also reading very positive reviews about this one. So I was expecting a similarly unsettling horror film, which Midsommer is most definitely not. Certainly not horror anyway.
But since then I have started to view it as a surreal dark comedy film, and in that light it feels much more agreeable.
I gave up on Safe after the first episode, awful writing.Watched the first episode of Safe and probably won't bother with any more.
Maybe it's because I've come to it straight from Unforgotten, but Safe just seemed lacking. If characters in dramas don't behave in a plausible way and their words seem unlikely, it puts me off.
A lot of what they said and did didn't seem realistic.
Safe is not a patch on Unforgotten. It seemed to lurch from one pointless plot twist to the next merely for the sake of extending the story. The Stranger is the same. They both just go on and on. I think Harlan Coben maybe needs a good editor.Watched the first episode of Safe and probably won't bother with any more.
Maybe it's because I've come to it straight from Unforgotten, but Safe just seemed lacking. If characters in dramas don't behave in a plausible way and their words seem unlikely, it puts me off.
A lot of what they said and did didn't seem realistic.
Safe is not a patch on Unforgotten. It seemed to lurch from one pointless plot twist to the next merely for the sake of extending the story. The Stranger is the same. They both just go on and on. I think Harlan Coben maybe needs a good editor.
Watched Sophie: A Murder In West Cork.
Not sure what to make of it.
There are different challenges for both approaches. Dubs often have to fit the mouth movements of the actors, so words and grammar get changed around to make the dialogue fit. Subtitles often have to be slightly condensed so they can be read at the same spead as the dialogue.While we're off topic on dubs vs subs, one that really bothers me is when the two are markedly different. To the effect that entire lines of dialogue are completely different between the two. Reason being that I watch everything with subtitles on. I find it better than turning up the volume because a lot of the time it's background sound overwhelming the dialogue. But I've seen cases where the English subs are a direct translation from Italian/Japanese/whatever, but the dub is a different interpretation. Or vice-versa. I wish the sub and dub teams would work together. I see this most frequently when watching anime with the youngster - he's understandably not into subtitles at his age, so I'll watch the dub of say Porco Rosso but still have the subtitles on for me. And it bothers my brain that what they're saying doesn't match the printed word.
I watched it aswell. As true crime stuff goes I thought it was interesting. 3 episodes was a good length, not too long and drawn out so easy to watch all of it in an evening.
I notice Ian Bailey is taking legal action against Netflix so there'll be further attention on him rather than Sophie. It was hard to come to any conclusion other than him being guilty. The idea he could sit around in the town square reciting poems and be accepted must feel so shit for her family. And the copper who led the investigation did far too much laughing. Cunts all round.
I think that ..
Bailey's partner made the biggest statement about him. At the time of the investigation she told gardai that Bailey had been in bed with her that night but that he had gone early. He claimed he went to the studio. But she said he came back and had a scratch on his forehead and scratches on his hands. That, along with the Italian student saying a dark coat was soaking in a bucket in the bathroom and then the evidence of a fire behind the studio...all within 2 days of the murder.
The dpp said it was all circumstantial...but fuck it...the guy told numbers of people he did it.
It's very weird.
And yet again the guy gets a load of attention. It's as if he thrives on it.
The good thing is Jules has now left him.
Midsommar
Creepy as fuck.
It’s a superb break up film wrapped in and around a folk horror. I appreciate its a divisive film but whoever doesnt like it is a blatant wrongun.
how is it not a horror film? it’s 100% a horror filmI wish I’d thought it was creepy. TBF, my opinion of it has improved since I first saw it.
I was initially very disappointed with it, after loving the director’s superb previous film Hereditary, which was a proper horror film and then some, and also reading very positive reviews about this one. So I was expecting a similarly unsettling horror film, which Midsommer is most definitely not. Certainly not horror anyway.
But since then I have started to view it as a surreal dark comedy film, and in that light it feels much more agreeable.
I enjoyed the first series, it's a bit hit and miss but generally good quality. Watched the first couple of sketches of the new show last night and it didn't seem to get off to a flying start. Had to switch it off because it bit a bit too sweary for my daughter.Okay, so someone at work casually mentioned today, while talking about good quality sketch comedies, I think you should leave.
This was literally the first time my mind registered this series as existing, never mind noticing it on Netflix. But apart from my colleague’s very enthusiastic endorsement of it, I see that it also enjoys very positive reviews across the board.
I’ve just done a search ITT and unless I mistyped something it looks like nobody has ever talked about it in here. Has anyone watched it?
I Think You Should Leave With Tim Robinson: Season 1 | Rotten Tomatoes
Actor Tim Robinson stars in this sketch comedy series -- which he also co-created -- that sees him trying to get people to go away. In each segment, Robinson and his guests do whatever they can to try to drive someone to the point that they need -- or desperately want -- to leave. Robinson spent...www.rottentomatoes.com