Yes the famous anti abortion movement that never threatened anythingOne for the 'how do you know when you're getting old?' thread but I do still find it confusing when the first post is the reply to the second post:
View attachment 321124
If this has been widened out to be the thread to discuss Roe v Wade, maybe a title rejig might be in order?
Have we had all the stuff about people arming themselves yet? I know we shouldn’t take the temperature of a society from Twitter, but still. Things seem heated across there .
Shit the US leftist pundit class has a lot of borderline red brown grifters
This whole shit started in the 70s when the evangelicals needed a distraction from still supporting segregation long after it was no longer cool if we are talking about dead babies we arent talking about how you are racist cunts with racially segregated churches
If this has been widened out to be the thread to discuss Roe v Wade, maybe a title rejig might be in order?
Have we had all the stuff about people arming themselves yet? I know we shouldn’t take the temperature of a society from Twitter, but still. Things seem heated across there .
I think that's significant enough to need another thread
The BBC in typical fashion has totally gone 'both sides' on this issue giving equal weight and credence to a minority view. Even giving airtime to a UK-based anti-abortionist on the 'Today' programme who represents a view held by only 9% of the country and who, at the very end of the interview, tried to disingenuously tie in the rights of the fetus to disability rights when the topic briefly veered into terminations due to profound disability. On the US side of things, they gave equal weight with a 50-50 split of 6 US voters on the topic. Fucking dismal.
Fair enough. Women do get impatient, though, when men can't see their problem. I can't speak for others but most people in charge in the UK and the west generally are, in fact, still white men. That doesn't mean white men, or men generally, are to blame for it, just that it's harder for them to see the problems other people have to deal with because the system is generally and historically designed to favour the dominant class, so they take things for granted the way fish take water for granted.
This guy thinks the Republicans are the dog that caught a car:
I've felt in the past that abortion is an issue the Republican use to pull in votes when their policies actually hurt their base. If you look at the red states, they're the ones who are going to be most affected by this ruling. If you overlay a map of where abortion is illegal once Roe v. Wade is overruled, it overlaps well with places with the highest levels of maternal death, poor outcomes for newborns, poverty, teen pregnancy, and just about last on any list of wellbeing. This ruling isn't going to help any of those stats and will make them substantially worse.
This guy thinks the Republicans are the dog that caught a car:
I've felt in the past that abortion is an issue the Republican use to pull in votes when their policies actually hurt their base. If you look at the red states, they're the ones who are going to be most affected by this ruling. If you overlay a map of where abortion is illegal once Roe v. Wade is overruled, it overlaps well with places with the highest levels of maternal death, poor outcomes for newborns, poverty, teen pregnancy, and just about last on any list of wellbeing. This ruling isn't going to help any of those stats and will make them substantially worse.
This guy thinks the Republicans are the dog that caught a car:
I've felt in the past that abortion is an issue the Republican use to pull in votes when their policies actually hurt their base. If you look at the red states, they're the ones who are going to be most affected by this ruling. If you overlay a map of where abortion is illegal once Roe v. Wade is overruled, it overlaps well with places with the highest levels of maternal death, poor outcomes for newborns, poverty, teen pregnancy, and just about last on any list of wellbeing. This ruling isn't going to help any of those stats and will make them substantially worse.
As per the video, if the Dems have any sort of backbone and fight in them, they'd pummel the republicans about this issue every day up to and beyond the midterms... The one glimmer of hope from this obscenity is that it ends up royally fucking the republicans moving forwards and that it hastens the codification of Roe into law.
If you're lucky.“Capable of living on their own and making independent choices on their own lives”?
Is that the criteria?
What’s the cutoff going to be? 38 years old?
Looking at the numbers, it's specifically white evangelical protestants among whom there is a majority against all abortion (and a large majority at that). Among nearly all other demographics, there's a majority in favour of at least some abortion rights.
I don't have the links to hand, but I read a while ago a fascinating piece about the history of r/w evangelical churches and the way that the right coopted them into their cause in the 70s and 80s. It was that way around, essentially - right wingers coopting religion rather than religious people coopting the right wing. I may try to dig it out when I have the time.
Polls vary a little, but they all tell essentially the same story. Catholics are split roughly 50:50. Evangelicals (plus Mormons and Jehovah's witnesses) are the group in which anti-abortion views are in a significant majority and strongly held. And generally the more religiously active you are, the more likely you are to be anti-abortion.That is quite odd, because it is the Roman Catholic church in the UK that is most anti-abortion. It ties in with their belief that a fertilised egg is a person.
Also priest want more toysThat is quite odd, because it is the Roman Catholic church in the UK that is most anti-abortion. It ties in with their belief that a fertilised egg is a person.
You must be right. I hate the NRA and that whole right-wing gun obsessive scene, but if I lived in the US I'd want to know how to use various weapons, and to own a gun. I know it's controversial over here, but honestly if you don't have a lot of social capital, surely it's a good idea to be able to defend yourself somehow.Personally, I think every adult should have a basic knowledge of firearms in the US. If for no other reason than you should know how to unload it safely, if you caught a child with one, or found one somewhere. This isn't likely, even in the US, but if you needed that knowledge, you'd have it.
Fixed it for you.Also priest want more boys