Crumbs!
Milo Yiannoupoulis banned!
- Thread starter Biscuitician
- Start date
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
those are carrot cake crumbs
they have a lovely creamy filling
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I thought you said carrot cake - that looks more like red velvet crumbs.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
probably best to give it a miss once Pickman's model has got his fork in itnah carrot cake is rank
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
had some nice toblerone cake the other daynah carrot cake is rank
friedaweed
Me and me girl named Jane
Are you lot playing soggy-Biscuitician on this thread now? Or as PB would call it "A custard cream circle jerk"?
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
by this hour of the day friedaweed has surely wanked his balls flat, filed for wankruptcy etc
You would understand my point/argument if :
1. You actually knew much about the man you are defending.
2. You actually knew much about the complexities of racism and how those things can play out in the fetishisation of sexual partners/sexual preference etc. Even a cursory investigation on your part on the above two points would give you ample to think about.
Your continued patronising pseudo intellectual waffle and now asking that I do your homework for you is tedious.
Some people have experience, knowledge/have studied things that you haven't. We all have to accept that at some point don't we?
Also, 'just because you appear to have friends that support you' ?That is pretty desperate, you clearly don't know about my relationship/interactions with other members here. It's not about me, it's about the point I have made.
I suspect that my knowledge of him is similarly based as yours might be, by reading some of his material online and elsewhere, but I have not met him in person, nor am I sure that I would wish to. Have you?
I can't see the point you appear to think you are making in respect of knowledge and experience, except that you appear to be making a claim to knowledge that you particularly have. Based on your previous posts I assume this is largely personal and based on your subjective experience. As to knowing about the, '[...] complexities of racism', well, I'll leave you with your self-professed privilege in that regard.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Twat
No idea I fear -- this thread has become 16 pages long before I even saw it ...
Will have another look when I've more time.
It's 16 pages long because someone decided to make accusations that i was racist, misogynist and abusive without evidence and to completely ignore repeated requests to provide this evidence.No idea I fear -- this thread has become 16 pages long before I even saw it ...
Will have another look when I've more time.
you've read some books haven't you I can tell
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Treacle Toes
Time
Are you familiar with the term 'gaslighting'?
'Self professed privilege'
Are you really suggesting that I for one second would feel any kind of privilege in having experienced racism both personally and indirectly and therefore have an interest and subsequent knowledge of many of it's complexities?Let us remember what you are going to great lengths to avoid shall we....
He may be very many things but I don't think he can be identified as racist, at least when it comes to his sexual proclivities!
The problem is that you are wrong but don't have the maturity or gumption to accept that. Nor do you have the interest to do a bit of research to gain further understanding about why you have been disagreed with.
You are going to great lengths to avoid the fact you made a statement that doesn't hold true and are doing some whiney, pseudo-intellectual, condescending bullshit dance around it.
Last edited:
Nah, working class folk don't read books.....
Are you familiar with the term 'gaslighting'?
'Self professed privilege'
Let us remember what you are going to great lengths to avoid shall we....
The problem is that you are wrong but don't have the maturity or gumption to accept that. Nor do you have the interest to do a bit of research to gain further understanding about why you have been disagreed with.
You are going to great lengths to avoid the fact you made a statement that doesn't hold true and are doing some whiney, pseudo-intellectual, condescending bullshit dance around it.
You stated Milo was racist. When challenged to provide evidence you obfuscated and attempted to suggest that I was racist, whilst also making a non-defined claim to authority based on an undefined exclusivity based privilege.
So. Milo is racist. Provide evidence.
you can't even be original with that. a folk already posted it earlier in the thread.
Similar threads
