Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Masterchef: The Professionals

So are we saying that the BBC see Gregg Wallace as the talent on MasterChef and are unwilling to upset him in any way?

Let him make his offensive jokes as long as he makes series 45 of MasterChef?

God knows what Michel Roux Jnr got away with.
GW left unhindered, and open secret while Michael Roux Jnr gets fired because of some poxy potatoes. Sickening.
 
It’s great that the BBC can still give us those shared moments in the national consciousness as we discover yet another one of their highly paid stars is a piece of shit

Can’t wait for the DA stuff to come out in a few years time
 
One of the positive things to come out of this is that, at least in my Facebook and other social media accounts, the number of people I know who I haven't really ever seen show any political or social bias but who have reacted to this.

Just showing what an absolute tosser he is and also how many women are effected by this sort of thing but how we are programmed to keep quiet about it.
 
I guess Wallace could be positioning for a role as GB News's first TV Chef.. i hear its quite lucrative working over there. Failing that there's always a regular slot of Channel 5 daytime TV.
He can't cook so he'd fit in well with the other pervs and incompetents in such a role
 
Gregg Wallace gets my vote for cunt of the year.

There are thousands upon thousands of crass men like Wallace who assert social dominance through performative coarseness. Opprobrium should be saved for the institution that decided Wallace was untouchable talent, and fostered a culture where complaining about that sort of thing was pointless and career-limiting.
 
There are thousands upon thousands of crass men like Wallace who assert social dominance through performative coarseness. Opprobrium should be saved for the institution that decided Wallace was untouchable talent, and fostered a culture where complaining about that sort of thing was pointless and career-limiting.
Why can't it be for the institution  and the thousands upon thousands of crass men?
 
There are thousands upon thousands of crass men like Wallace who assert social dominance through performative coarseness. Opprobrium should be saved for the institution that decided Wallace was untouchable talent, and fostered a culture where complaining about that sort of thing was pointless and career-limiting.
No, these men absolutely shouldn't (continue to) get a pass for this behaviour. FFS.

ETA And it's really not a great look for a man to be telling other people (women) where their fucked offness should lie on the issue of abusive men.
 
Last edited:
Why can't it be for the institution  and the thousands upon thousands of crass men?

Because thousands upon thousands of men can’t all be “cunt of the year”. I agree they all deserve opprobrium, just not that particular accolade. Should have worded better.

No, these men absolutely shouldn't (continue to) get a pass for this behaviour. FFS.

ETA And it's really not a great look for a man to be telling other people (women) where their fucked offness should lie on the issue of abusive men.

I didn’t offer a pass, I just said they shouldn’t be enabled by public broadcasting corporations.

And I don’t think there is any reason to assume that DrunkJournalist is a woman. Or a journalist. I’m pretty careful usually not to argue the toss over this sort of thing with actual women who are posting in good faith - unless they’ve instigated it directly, as here.
 
Because thousands upon thousands of men can’t all be “cunt of the year”.
But a broadcaster can?
I didn’t offer a pass, I just said they shouldn’t be enabled by public broadcasting corporations.
You said we should save our opprobrium for the institution. I think we should criticise both the institution and the individuals.

And I don’t think there is any reason to assume that DrunkJournalist is a woman. Or a journalist.
I wasn't talking about DrunkJournalist in particular. I was referring to the people reading your post, some of whom are women.

I’m pretty careful usually not to argue the toss over this sort of thing with actual women who are posting in good faith.

I think you need to try harder.
 
Nor, IMO, is it acceptable for Wallace to implicitly excuse his behaviour by claiming to be working class. Men of any class background are capable of abusing their power and behaving inappropriately towards women. I'm sure I'm not alone in growing up with many quite socially conservative working class men who knew instinctively how to behave without causing offence.
 
If you can stomach looking closely at his topless shots he appears to have a Milwall tattoo on his chest... and we all know what their motto is..

37757656-9125555-Changes_He_explained_The_doctor_said_you_have_huge_cholesterol_h-a-19_1610098656399.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom