ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I thought it was Americans who didn't understand irony.
Sure and a lot of yer Yanks are grandsons of the sod.
I thought it was Americans who didn't understand irony.
Sudan is currently running at 117 deaths per 1000 births
The 2005 under-five mortality rate was 112/1000.Your link's a bit old, its map of Sudan still includes South Sudan!
The 2005 under-five mortality rate was 112/1000.
Thankfully the 2015 UNICEF figures are better:
Sudan = 77/1000 SDN - UNICEF DATA (down from 2005 = 95)
South Sudan = 99/1000 SSD - UNICEF DATA (down from 2005 = 140)
But obviously an order of magnitude above the (for eg) UK = 5/1000
(PS the worst figure for 2015 is Angola with 167/1000)
Me granny always said no good would come of them Reagans going to Amerikaye.Sure and a lot of yer Yanks are grandsons of the sod.
Me granny always said no good would come of them Reagans going to Amerikaye.
“There is no evidence of a mass grave outside a home for unmarried women operated by nuns in Tuam, Ireland, near Galway, in the 20th century. The hoax is now back again, and an obliging media are running with the story as if it were true.”
And people wonder how Tuam could have happened?Who is this fuckwit ?
And people wonder how Tuam could have happened?
Probably the type that thinks eating meat on Friday makes Baby Jesus cry
Ireland was poor, but it was never that poor. In New Zealand, the depression of the 1930s was so bad that some people resorted to living in caves; yet it also produced a proper social democratic labour party that built a functioning welfare state. This was something Ireland never achieved, and not because of the state's poverty, but because of the absence of any political will to do better.These homes must be viewed in the wider context also. Ireland was a poverty stricken country. Small farm holdings and large families most who would never go past national school. Boys reared for the emigrant ship for construction sites and girls destined for domestic service or early marriage.
No sex education or family planning. Any girl who became pregnant (assisted by a man!!! who seem to escape all blame) was not welcome bringing another mouth to feed home. The option was to the mother and child home where religious orders did society's dirty work. Certainly a lot of the treatment these girls got was far from Christian. However as regards the adoptions I wonder was it better that the poor kids were given to families rather than be landed back into some one roomed tenement or farm labourers cottage. From reading various reports it is obvious that the State just washed their hands of anything to do with
supervision and inspection of orphanages, juvenile reformatories etc. The media of the times didnt exactly cover themselves in glory either
Well known fact that poor people don't care about their children or care for them.<snip>However as regards the adoptions I wonder was it better that the poor kids were given to families rather than be landed back into some one roomed tenement or farm labourers cottage. From reading various reports it is obvious that the State just washed their hands of anything to do with supervision and inspection of orphanages, juvenile reformatories etc. The media of the times didnt exactly cover themselves in glory either
How did you come to that conclusion?
- Well known fact that poor people don't care about their children or care for them.
I read accounts of both young males and females ending up on farms in the outback. It wasn't cheap labour. It was free labour.Ireland was poor, but it was never that poor. In New Zealand, the depression of the 1930s was so bad that some people resorted to living in caves; yet it also produced a proper social democratic labour party that built a functioning welfare state. This was something Ireland never achieved, and not because of the state's poverty, but because of the absence of any political will to do better.
As for poor kids who were adopted - in the case of those sent to Australia, didn't they end up as cheap labour on farms anyway?
Much as Connolly predicted, the defeat of the revolution lead to a carnival of reaction on both sides of the border. A phrase that trips off the tongue far too easily for the horrors it describes.Ireland was poor, but it was never that poor. In New Zealand, the depression of the 1930s was so bad that some people resorted to living in caves; yet it also produced a proper social democratic labour party that built a functioning welfare state. This was something Ireland never achieved, and not because of the state's poverty, but because of the absence of any political will to do better.
This was not an accident or a mistake, this was not merely neglect. This was thousands of children across several homes run by a religious order by a massive sect. You cant compare this to say ISIS (who make up about 1% ofMulsims).
You might not recognise them as Christian, but alot of people would.
And frequently, seriously abused labour.I read accounts of both young males and females ending up on farms in the outback. It wasn't cheap labour. It was free labour.
What rubbish, no true scotsman all over again.To be a Christian is not a label. It is the way you live your life.
These people were not motivated by faith, nowhere in the New Testament does it say 'Demonstrate your faith by abusing children, and killing them by your neglect'.
Not one single Christian that I know would regard these people as being Christian, in anything other than their self identification.
What rubbish, no true scotsman all over again.
Who is this fuckwit ?
Och Aye the noo, Harry Lauder appeared in Glesgae toon, Oor Wullie, MHAIRI BLACK, Irn Bru, Middenface McNulty - hey this pretending to be a Scotchman thing might actually catch on!What rubbish, no true scotsman all over again.
Well, it's not like official church bodies around the world have sanctioned and even commissioned lots of abuses is it? No no, nothing to see here...Oh well, you will know best I expect.
Look over there! Cheryl Fernandence has a new tattooWell, it's not like official church bodies around the world have sanctioned and even commissioned lots of abuses is it? No no, nothing to see here...
Well, it's not like official church bodies around the world have sanctioned and even commissioned lots of abuses is it? No no, nothing to see here...
Nor can I help you clearly.You appear to be unable to distinguish between those who self identify as Christians, but do not behave as such, and those who through their lives and actions are Christians. Sorry, I can't help you any further.
Shit...even the bishops in Ireland have reacted with remorse and shame.....and rightly so...but it's all too late...what's new there?
They have, but their secular mouth piece hasn't been so forthcoming. The dangerous thing is to think the church is finished influencing people politically, it hasn't it just airs it views through the Iona Institute, who for some reason get an inordinate amount of air time.