Speculation can stop. With an insight to aviation, I can tell you that the only other time that an aircraft has "disappeared" was a US Air Force fighter, when it was shot down just above the East Sea in the 70s
"China has new satellite images of one or more floating objects that could be related to missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, Malaysian Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said Saturday.
“The news that I just received is that the Chinese ambassador received satellite image of floating objects in the southern corridor and they will be sending ships to verify,” Hishammuddin told a news briefing in Kuala Lumpur.
It was not immediately clear how many possible objects had been spotted, but the minister said one was estimated at 22 meters by 30 meters (72 by 98 feet)."
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/New...ation-as-MH370-search-enters-third-week-.html
According to pprune, & a statement released, the object isn't 30m, but 22x13 - not that that changes much.
It was not immediately clear how many possible objects had been spotted, but the minister said one was estimated at 22 meters by 30 meters (72 by 98 feet)."
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/New...ation-as-MH370-search-enters-third-week-.html
I do love the way the Chinese always use that archaic font when displaying Western alphabets It's the same one that turns up in product manuals, too.
The Telegraph has a transcript of cockpit communications: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...l-54-minutes-of-communication-from-MH370.html
Or, rather, an English translation of a Mandarin translation of the English transcript.
I may be being dim, but that does not look like the same place the Australians are looking in?This is purported to be the final RMAF primary radar trace of the flight, west of Penang, which indicates it was travelling NW along N571 via VAMPI and MEKAR towards NILAM. Last paint being at 0222local between MEKAR and NILAM. (Apparently not VAMPI-GIVAL-IGREX as previously reported).
View attachment 50674
This is purported to be the final RMAF primary radar trace of the flight, west of Penang, which indicates it was travelling NW along N571 via VAMPI and MEKAR towards NILAM. Last paint being at 0222local between MEKAR and NILAM. (Apparently not VAMPI-GIVAL-IGREX as previously reported).
View attachment 50674
I may be being dim, but that does not look like the same place the Australians are looking in?
I may be being dim, but that does not look like the same place the Australians are looking in?
I think it took two years to find the Air France plane that crashed into the Atlantic. So a while yet I guess.How much has this cost I wonder?
At what point do they have no option but concede defeat and just say we looked very hard but the planet is just too fucking huge.
They can't do that, we've spent years telling ourselves the planet is getting smaller.How much has this cost I wonder?
At what point do they have no option but concede defeat and just say we looked very hard but the planet is just too fucking huge.
I think it took two years to find the Air France plane that crashed into the Atlantic. So a while yet I guess.
The search will obviously go on, the question is when does the media circus stop?I think it took two years to find the Air France plane that crashed into the Atlantic. So a while yet I guess.
Says who JC?But even years ago, they had spy satellites that could read licence plates from space. Why not use those type of satellites here? Zoom right in on the ambiguous floating objects.
GeoEye
GeoEye's GeoEye-1 satellite was launched September 6, 2008.[7] The GeoEye-1 satellite has the highest resolution of any commercial imaging system and is able to collect images with a ground resolution of 0.41 meters (16 inches) in the panchromatic or black and white mode. It collects multispectral or color imagery at 1.65-meter resolution or about 64 inches, a factor of two better than existing commercial satellites with four-band multistage imaging capabilities. While the satellite is able to collect imagery at 0.41 meters, GeoEye's operating license from the U.S. Government requires re-sampling the imagery to 0.5 meters for all customers not explicitly granted a waiver by the U.S. Government[8]
DigitalGlobe
DigitalGlobe's WorldView-2 satellite provides high resolution commercial satellite imagery with 0.46 m spatial resolution(panchromatic only).[9] The 0.46 meters resolution of WorldView-2's panchromatic images allows the satellite to distinguish between objects on the ground that are at least 46 cm apart. Similarly DigitalGlobe's QuickBird satellite provides 0.6 meter resolution (at NADIR) panchromatic images.
Spot Image
The 3 SPOT satellites in orbit (Spot 2, 4 and 5) provide images with a large choice of resolutions – from 2.5 m to 1 km. Spot Image also distributes multiresolution data from other optical satellites, in particular from Formosat-2 (Taiwan) and Kompsat-2 (South Korea) and from radar satellites (TerraSar-X, ERS, Envisat, Radarsat). Spot Image will also be the exclusive distributor of data from the forthcoming very-high resolution Pleiades satellites with a resolution of 0.50 meter or about 20 inches. The first launch is planned for the end of 2011. The company also offers infrastructures for receiving and processing, as well as added value options.
All these satellite images keep showing up. A piece of something floating in a lot of water. They estimate the size - maybe 70, 80 feet.
But even years ago, they had spy satellites that could read licence plates from space. Why not use those type of satellites here? Zoom right in on the ambiguous floating objects.
That's consistent with what Mark Lowenthal, a former intelligence official, thinks, too. According to Lowenthal, president of the Arlington-based Intelligence and Security Academy, commercial satellite imagery can make out objects that are as small as 20 inches across. But Lowenthal notes that according to various press reports military satellites are about twice again as good, capable of resolution down to 10 inches. The Federation of American Scientists has a great side-by-side comparison of the same image sampled at various resolutions.
Yes but if they train all the high power stuff on looking for bits of plane what's looking out for a sneaky missile attack?All these satellite images keep showing up. A piece of something floating in a lot of water. They estimate the size - maybe 70, 80 feet.
But even years ago, they had spy satellites that could read licence plates from space. Why not use those type of satellites here? Zoom right in on the ambiguous floating objects.
Yes but if they train all the high power stuff on looking for bits of plane what's looking out for a sneaky missile attack?