snowy_again
Slush
Yeah, that's not going to happen.
I'm just going to enjoy it while it's there and it's a place I'm happy to support.I'm just going to quote this for reference when in <3 years time loogie boogie is foxton vibrant overpriced gentrification! I seem to remember the same situation when Federation opened the floodgates in brixton, and then subsequently 'barista coffee shops' appeared on those dull '10 signs hipsters are moving in' lists...
Bar stools?Does anyone know if the Cambria has highchairs?
... for babies?Bar stools?
Does anyone know if the Cambria has highchairs?
Works on the "Loughborough house" building are underway too. If they do a good job on it I think it'll have quite an effect on how that bit of CHL feels.
I think it would be good to have a bit of open space there.
So who owns the properties? And because some consultant thinks it would look nice the council then CPOs them for demolition?I agree. Stations need space to breath, and LJ is all narrow pavements. It would create an actual "town center" feel.
Exactly. If they somehow persuaded Network Rail to upgrade the station to (re)provide platforms serving Denmark Hill/Peckham/Lewisham etc. and the plaza was part of that - then you would be talking.That image was made for Loughborough Junction Action Group, IIRC. It's nothing but aspiration.
Exactly. If they somehow persuaded Network Rail to upgrade the station to (re)provide platforms serving Denmark Hill/Peckham/Lewisham etc. and the plaza was part of that - then you would be talking.
Without this it looks like pie in the sky. Worse - it is really traditional "slum clearance".
Replacing a 5 year old temporary car-wash (particularly one adorned with illegal advertisements) with an open air gym and grassy park extension is not really comparable with demolishing 100 year old buildings is it?I don't see why this open space needs to be linked to reopening of any connections. What's the logic behind your statement? I find it odd that you were supporting a Brixton beach outside the Barrier Block, but no open space at LJ.
Replacing a 5 year old temporary car-wash (particularly one adorned with illegal advertisements) with an open air gym and grassy park extension is not really comparable with demolishing 100 year old buildings is it?
It wouldn't be necessary to demolish any buildings to reopen the Denmark Hill platfrms, as far as I know.
But it's ok to demolish 100 year old buildings as long as they reopen the line to Denmark Hill? It seems, in principle, you have no problem demolishing 100 year old buildings, all that is up for negotiation is the price you'll exact.
I think the main problem with the Denmark Hill/Clapham Jn platforms would be that they are on a curve, which presents a modern-day safety issue.
No idea exactly how curvy they are, but the rule is that station platforms can't be located on horizontal curves with radii less than 1000m. Work that one out if you can!I don't think they are on that much of a curve are they?