snadge
metal alchemist
I have been accused of many horrible things just for admitting publicly that some 14 year old girls are sexually attractive,
Must admit I can relate to this one.
When I was 15.
I have been accused of many horrible things just for admitting publicly that some 14 year old girls are sexually attractive,
Beet,nickedBeet Generation.
I've never eaten a turnip. Well neeps but they're sweeds.
Vege thought of the day.
Even more confused now i've asked wikipedia what a neep is.
It says:
"A neep or tumshie is the ruit crap brassica rapa var. rapa that's aft growen in maumie climates athort the warld for its white, bulbous tapruit. Smaw, neshy kynds is growen for human consumption, while lairger kynds is growen as feed for stock. Neeps is weel-likit in Europe, parteecular in caulder airts, sith they growe weel in cauld climates an can be keepit for mony months efter the hairst."
Beet,nicked
I occasionaly do that when I am driving somewhere. Tbh I have done this all my life, I used to end up on the way to old workplacesMore than usual today as well. So much that I got on the wrong train and headed off in the opposite direction from that intended.
OK. I saw the thread titles, but it doesn't let you read the threads.
So perhaps you might explain - for those of us who don't understand the significance - why we should "understand the difference"?
Are you concerned about Stanley's confidentiality?
In what way(s) do you think Stan's drinking should be taken into account, Johnny?Given what we know about how that particular illness ravages the life of the person afflicted with it, and the consequences it has on their behavior, amongst other things, it seems surprising to me that this aspect of his life seems to get ignored, when people are closely scrutinizing the things he says or, purportedly, does.
In what way is it ignored?Like just about everyone on the thread, I'm not a medical professional; but from my layperson's perspective, after reading Stanley posts for many years, it would appear that the man is a serious alcoholic, and has been for a long time.
Given what we know about how that particular illness ravages the life of the person afflicted with it, and the consequences it has on their behavior, amongst other things, it seems surprising to me that this aspect of his life seems to get ignored, when people are closely scrutinizing the things he says or, purportedly, does.
In what way(s) do you think Stan's drinking should be taken into account, Johnny?
Drug and alcohol dependence can certainly disinhibit someone, but to suggest that heavy drinking is to blame for all of Stanley's problems is - IMO - pushing what alcohol can do beyond all credibility. Unless you're suggesting serious alcohol-related brain damage.The last thing I'll say on this thread:
Something else that I've observed after reading U75 posts for many years, is that a number of us have struggled, at times, with substance abuse problems, emotional difficulties, mental health problems, etc.
Perhaps it might be worth reflecting on how those difficulties affected our own lives, our own behavior; and to think about that, when viewing from afar, the life of another person who appears to have some of the same difficulties that so many of us have had to face, ourselves.
He, always, does that. Colons: too many of them, too.Altogether too many commas Johnny.
He, always, does that. Colons: too many of them, too.
Too many: full stop; period. Which, in itself, is: a full stop. Period.Too many full stop. Period.
Your word of the day is "superfluous".The use of punctuation is becoming a lost art, now that most punctuation symbols aren't included in the first screen of a cel phone keypad; it's therefore incumbent upon those of us who were trained in an earlier time, to carry the flag, as it were, for proper usage - all the while dodging the slings and arrows of the grammatically-challenged hordes.
Your word of the day is "superfluous".
(oh and it's cell* phone, by the way).
The semicolon is incorrect in his earlier post, though.I'll just about let you have that semi-colon, but definitely not the comma after time, and the comma after art is questionable.
The semicolon is incorrect in his earlier post, though.
The one that starts with "The last thing I'll say on this thread".
Semicolons: a brief guide.
You can use semicolons to separate items in a list, especially where one or more of the items is a phrase.
"We ate ice creams; candy floss; fish and chips; and doughnuts."
You can also use it between two clauses to create a longer sentence, rather like one might use a connective such as "however", "because" or "therefore".
"My shoes are falling apart; I've been wearing them to play rugby."
However, this is only permitted when the clause following the semicolon could stand as a full sentence on its own.
You're very keen on scattering commas everywhere too. Most inelegant.On review, I believe that you are right.
In any event, I'm hopeful that you were able to glean the message from the post, in spite of the inelegant punctuation.