Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mortgage paying off/affording extension question

Not advice but our own experiance. Mrs S got some inheritance a while ago which meant we could pay 30k off our mortgage, which we did. We timed this to coincide with a remortgage, so no repayment fees . The upshot is that we now have a small mortgage and save the difference in payments about £900/month. This we are now using to pay for new windows and we have 1 year to go on the remaining mortgage.

We are lucky too, but 900/month is a lot to give to the bank and not save. Kabbes makes an excellent point re advice btw- everyone's circumstances are different.
 
Yes, agreed. Although I would note that as mortgage rates climb, it becomes harder and harder to find something else that will reliably achieve this superior return after tax.


This I am way more doubtful about. BTL is not a good investment class (not least because it’s often all that most people can imagine doing with their money, meaning that it’s too competitive). Tax heavily counts against you, for a start. Up-front stamp duty will cost you something like 6% of the property. You’re paying tax on the rent in excess of the mortgage, and may even be paying some tax on the rest of the rent too. You’re likely to get clobbered with capital gains tax on sale if you’re holding it for more than 10 years. All these tax issues alone make the return difficult to beat the mortgage rate on your own property. In addition, you have the costs of remortgaging every few years, you have lots of costs on maintaining the physical asset, you have void periods, you potentially have management fees and ground rent. And then you have the hassle of dealing with the tenancy — your time is worth something too. Finally, property is “all or nothing” — you can’t sell just a bit of it if you need the money, and selling it at all can take months or even years.

All said, you can get dividend income from an equity fund that is at least as good as the rental income from a BTL but without any of the tax difficulties or the personal hassle, and it is also easy to instantly sell bits of the fund as and when you need it.
But would you have made more on the increase in value of the property or the fund over the last 20 years? Surely the value of the property.
 
But would you have made more on the increase in value of the property or the fund over the last 20 years? Surely the value of the property.
Last time I checked (which was for some other thread a while ago), general equity funds had outperformed general BTL investments across every time period I looked at, particularly if you make some basic assumptions about what happened to tax and reinvestment in that time.

For example, this shows that the S&P price return (ie ignoring dividends) has been 7.6% per annum over the last 20 years, which would make the total return something like 10% per annum. You wouldn’t have got anything like that in property (over the last 20 years, house price inflation has averaged something like 5.5% per annum), and that’s before you worry about capital gains tax (which you could have probably avoided with equity returns) and what to do with your reinvestments.
 
Last edited:
We paid our mortgage off 10 years ago and it was the best thing we ever did. We just didn’t go out/go on holiday for about 4 years, lived carefully and put any spare penny into it. The feeling of being free of the biggest debt most of us will ever take on changes your attitude towards life (and especially work) completely. Well worth it.
 
As kabbes and DownwardDog have already said, there are too many variables.
Can you afford the houseworks and to repay the mortgage?
If you have a good fixed rate now, you could possibly earn more interest on savings than you repay on the mortgage.
If you pay the mortgage now can you afford the improvements in cash or will you need to borrow and if you need to borrow is it going to be at much higher rates than you are currently paying.
If you keep a very small mortgage going, it could make it easier to borrow more in future rather having all the rigmarole in future.
 
NB other questions.
What is your attitude to risk and how careful are you with money IE if you leave it in savings are you likely to squander it?
ISA is a good tax free way if saving it, but if you really don't need it, a pension is a good place to stick some of it but only if you don't need it.
It is possible all your finances could do with a review which the advisor will do for you and also cover life insurance, critical illness cover etc.
 
There are all sorts of clever and sensible reasons not to pay off the mortgage. But I paid mine off really early and the emotional benefit of knowing the house was mine was worth £1000s to me every year.
 
If someone gave me the outstanding balance of my mortgage and I could do what I wanted with it I’d probably get the stuff I wanted sorted with the house and garden done first. But that’s based on knowing I’ve got 25+ years to work, my mortgage being 22% of my net pay until 2032, I don’t earn much so will struggle to pay for these things otherwise, and I want to stay here forever.
 
I paid my mortgage off last year. When late ma's probate is finally sorted then the plan is to have the house refurbished and a side extention and garden landscaped.
 
There are all sorts of clever and sensible reasons not to pay off the mortgage. But I paid mine off really early and the emotional benefit of knowing the house was mine was worth £1000s to me every year.

That's kind of my feeling. You can do clever things with it or just pay the fucker off. I'm effectively doing that already (have been drawing down the repayment sum from inheritance each month until repayment fees drop) and basically means I can be afford things like theatre tickets regularly, which didn't use to be the case.
 
Last time I checked (which was for some other thread a while ago), general equity funds had outperformed general BTL investments across every time period I looked at, particularly if you make some basic assumptions about what happened to tax and reinvestment in that time.

For example, this shows that the S&P price return (ie ignoring dividends) has been 7.6% per annum over the last 20 years, which would make the total return something like 10% per annum. You wouldn’t have got anything like that in property (over the last 20 years, house price inflation has averaged something like 5.5% per annum), and that’s before you worry about capital gains tax (which you could have probably avoided with equity returns) and what to do with your reinvestments.
Don't ignore the fact that each year, about 20 to 25 stocks leave the S&P 500, so if you could buy £1 share in each of the 500 then each year you would lose £25 - or 5% a year.
 
Don't ignore the fact that each year, about 20 to 25 stocks leave the S&P 500, so if you could buy £1 share in each of the 500 then each year you would lose £25 - or 5% a year.
That’s not how ann index tracker works.

First, you don’t buy an equal share of each, you buy an amount weighted by market capitalisation. So the amount dropping out are nowhere near 5% of your funds

Second, the ones dropping out don’t become worthless when they drop out of the top 500. They are still worth the same as they day before. The fund can therefore simply sell those stocks and use the funds raised to buy replacement stocks of those entering the index.

Third, an index fund smooths that process by gradually deweghting stocks that are heading out and adding in a bit from stocks likely to join over time.

The overall effect is that there is little to no impact from stocks leaving and joining at the bottom end of the index.
 
I was really considering investing for ten years in an index tracking fund but at the moment I can get 7% on a one year investment (in NZ) so I've gone for that. I also wanted to try the buy, reno and flick on a couple of properties, which now having the time to do so seems more appealing for a quick return. I haven't got any real pension funds put aside and I'm just about to turn 40 so really need to start considering the future... I've had some good advice from well off business people who I contract for re family trusts and holding companies, it seems like a big legal headache but potentially worthwhile. There's a lot of old housing stock out there and a massive shortage of affordable starter homes...
 
I have a chunk of money in a cash ISA and some more in, I think, an ethical stocks and shares fund thing. I assume right now that could be worth less than I put in it 3 years ago, but I intend to leave it there a while so it should pay off.
 
I might be totally out of sync with society but i can't understand why anyone wouldn't get it paid off and be free from debt. Once you get past that milestone then there is time to work on the other shackles...and then descend into a very enjoyable 'whatever it is that lights up life' , books, wine, walks, herbs, food, friends, films, clouds, pets, walks, or just work on being an interesting and vaguely useful character that is well known about the parish.
Because many people also have other commitments/responsibilities. If someone comes into a sum that's round about the balance of their mortgage, paying off their mortgage would be great, but it then means that they don't have the funds to do whatever the alternatives were, and sometimes those alternatives aren't just fripperies, like holidays or fancy cars, they might be important stuff, like the ability to give up work for a while, go back to study, and change career to something potentially more interesting or fulfilling, or parents with adult children might face the choice of pay off the mortgage or give money to their children for a deposit so they can get on the property ladder, it's either/or, they can't do both, or they might face a choice between pay off the mortgage or 'go on the holiday of a lifetime' that isn't really a holiday, but a trip to see relatives on the other side of the world who they haven't seen in years, or someone who's had problems with their hips/knees for years and is on an NHS waiting list and has been told it might be 3-4 years before they get new knees might want to pay to go private so they can get new knees and their quality of life back.
 
Yes, agreed. Although I would note that as mortgage rates climb, it becomes harder and harder to find something else that will reliably achieve this superior return after tax.


This I am way more doubtful about. BTL is not a good investment class (not least because it’s often all that most people can imagine doing with their money, meaning that it’s too competitive). Tax heavily counts against you, for a start. Up-front stamp duty will cost you something like 6% of the property. You’re paying tax on the rent in excess of the mortgage, and may even be paying some tax on the rest of the rent too. You’re likely to get clobbered with capital gains tax on sale if you’re holding it for more than 10 years. All these tax issues alone make the return difficult to beat the mortgage rate on your own property. In addition, you have the costs of remortgaging every few years, you have lots of costs on maintaining the physical asset, you have void periods, you potentially have management fees and ground rent. And then you have the hassle of dealing with the tenancy — your time is worth something too. Finally, property is “all or nothing” — you can’t sell just a bit of it if you need the money, and selling it at all can take months or even years.

All said, you can get dividend income from an equity fund that is at least as good as the rental income from a BTL but without any of the tax difficulties or the personal hassle, and it is also easy to instantly sell bits of the fund as and when you need it.
BTL isn't as good an investment as it used to be, that's for sure, there's no mortgage interest relief any more, there's more regulation - on the one hand, it's good for tenants that properties are required to be safer and more energy efficient, and dodgy landlords are driven out of the sector, but on the other hand many small-time investor landlords complain that it's harder to get rid of bad tenants, the kind who just stop paying rent and then trash the place causing thousands of pounds of damage.

And yes, it's not as liquid as other investments, but I think the major attraction when BTL first took off was that people were investing in bricks and mortar, they had a real, tangible asset, and that was important to them because people had been bitten by those other 'liquid' types of investments, ie people lost their pensions, think Robert Maxwell looting Mirror group pension funds, the Rover (car company) pension scandal, (plus the way companies could take pensions holidays in the good times, leaving the pension funds screwed in the bad times, was always odd). And then there was the collapse of Northern Rock. Plus the financial crisis. And stocks and shares were problematic, because companies could go bust. So people, especially ordinary working people, lost trust in businesses and the markets to look after their money, given that it could disappear in an instant.

Given the low levels of financial literacy, and literacy in general - the average adult reading age in the UK is nine-years-old, not everyone has the capacity to research and do their due diligence into different types of investment classes, weigh up the risks, etc. I suspect most people wouldn't know where to start looking to do the research. And aside from the occasional fluctuations and market corrections, property was seen as a good investment, overall. So people stick to what they know. And when what they know is that the houses on their street have perhaps doubled in price over the past X number of years, and the interest on their savings account was probably 0.1 per cent for at least part of that time. So it seems like a no brainer. Lots of people go into BTL very naively, not having a clue what they're doing, though, so undoubtedly some will lose out because of that.
 
Yes, agreed. Although I would note that as mortgage rates climb, it becomes harder and harder to find something else that will reliably achieve this superior return after tax.


This I am way more doubtful about. BTL is not a good investment class (not least because it’s often all that most people can imagine doing with their money, meaning that it’s too competitive). Tax heavily counts against you, for a start. Up-front stamp duty will cost you something like 6% of the property. You’re paying tax on the rent in excess of the mortgage, and may even be paying some tax on the rest of the rent too. You’re likely to get clobbered with capital gains tax on sale if you’re holding it for more than 10 years. All these tax issues alone make the return difficult to beat the mortgage rate on your own property. In addition, you have the costs of remortgaging every few years, you have lots of costs on maintaining the physical asset, you have void periods, you potentially have management fees and ground rent. And then you have the hassle of dealing with the tenancy — your time is worth something too. Finally, property is “all or nothing” — you can’t sell just a bit of it if you need the money, and selling it at all can take months or even years.

All said, you can get dividend income from an equity fund that is at least as good as the rental income from a BTL but without any of the tax difficulties or the personal hassle, and it is also easy to instantly sell bits of the fund as and when you need it.

The difference between a BTL property and an equity fund is that your captial is leveraged at 3 or 4:1 in the BTL. That's hard for a normal punter to do with an equity fund and might offset the disadvantages.

For the at least the last 25 years I've had people telling me what an awful investment real estate is yet I think I've made more money doing that that anything else I've ever done.
 
The difference between a BTL property and an equity fund is that your captial is leveraged at 3 or 4:1 in the BTL. That's hard for a normal punter to do with an equity fund and might offset the disadvantages.
That’s exactly the same as remortgaging your house and investing the proceeds in an equity fund. (In fact, you’re also likely to get a better mortgage rate.) If you wouldn’t do that with equities, you should think just as cautiously about doing it with a second property.

For the at least the last 25 years I've had people telling me what an awful investment real estate is yet I think I've made more money doing that that anything else I've ever done.

It’s not that BTL will lose you money (probably). It’s just that it is highly likely to be less efficient across all measurements than alternatives, once the entire cash flow has been collapsed and understood from a net perspective.

I’m not suggesting anybody goes stock picking, here, or sinks their money into a specialist fund. (I’m not actually advising anything at all!). I’m simply comparing buying a typical BTL (including its tax basis, its eventual sale and need to maintain the property) with the equivalent worldwide equity index tracker.
 
Last edited:
BTL isn't as good an investment as it used to be, that's for sure, there's no mortgage interest relief any more, there's more regulation - on the one hand, it's good for tenants that properties are required to be safer and more energy efficient, and dodgy landlords are driven out of the sector, but on the other hand many small-time investor landlords complain that it's harder to get rid of bad tenants, the kind who just stop paying rent and then trash the place causing thousands of pounds of damage.

And yes, it's not as liquid as other investments, but I think the major attraction when BTL first took off was that people were investing in bricks and mortar, they had a real, tangible asset, and that was important to them because people had been bitten by those other 'liquid' types of investments, ie people lost their pensions, think Robert Maxwell looting Mirror group pension funds, the Rover (car company) pension scandal, (plus the way companies could take pensions holidays in the good times, leaving the pension funds screwed in the bad times, was always odd). And then there was the collapse of Northern Rock. Plus the financial crisis. And stocks and shares were problematic, because companies could go bust. So people, especially ordinary working people, lost trust in businesses and the markets to look after their money, given that it could disappear in an instant.

Given the low levels of financial literacy, and literacy in general - the average adult reading age in the UK is nine-years-old, not everyone has the capacity to research and do their due diligence into different types of investment classes, weigh up the risks, etc. I suspect most people wouldn't know where to start looking to do the research. And aside from the occasional fluctuations and market corrections, property was seen as a good investment, overall. So people stick to what they know. And when what they know is that the houses on their street have perhaps doubled in price over the past X number of years, and the interest on their savings account was probably 0.1 per cent for at least part of that time. So it seems like a no brainer. Lots of people go into BTL very naively, not having a clue what they're doing, though, so undoubtedly some will lose out because of that.
Ann, you’re kind of proving my point that people do BTL not because it’s a good idea but because property is all they know. Which gives the reason why they do it if unadvised, but doesn’t mean they should be advised to do it.

The amount of financial literacy you need to buy a worldwide index tracker is about 1% of the financial literacy you need to buy a BTL property. The very fact that your post talks about people buying flats without really having analysed the transaction doesn’t show you don’t need financial literacy to do BTL, it just shows that people are doing it naively. Again, I would not advise people to make a large financial commitment unadvisedly.

You also exhibit a lot of the classic confused statements about other elements of equity investment (like referring to “bricks and mortar” and the Maxwell fraud — companies are also real world entities, and the Maxwell fraud was absolutely nothing to do with equity investment). But I think arguing about individual fallacies is a distraction from this thread and what Cloo should do. The key point is really that naive investment doesn’t become a good idea just because you haven’t analysed it or understood the alternatives.
 
Last edited:
That’s exactly the same as remortgaging your house and investing the proceeds in an equity fund. (In fact, you’re also likely to get a better mortgage rate.) If you wouldn’t do that with equities, you should think just as cautiously about doing it with a second property.

The calculus is a little different here in Australia as we have the blessing of negative gearing. You can run a rental property at a net loss (usually by mortgaging the shit out of it) and use the losses to offset the tax liability on other income.
 
The calculus is a little different here in Australia as we have the blessing of negative gearing. You can run a rental property at a net loss (usually by mortgaging the shit out of it) and use the losses to offset the tax liability on other income.
Well, that’s a discussion for another time, but Cloo certainly can’t do that, so I would continue to caution her against BTL investment.
 
BTL isn't as good an investment as it used to be, that's for sure, there's no mortgage interest relief any more, there's more regulation - on the one hand, it's good for tenants that properties are required to be safer and more energy efficient, and dodgy landlords are driven out of the sector, but on the other hand many small-time investor landlords complain that it's harder to get rid of bad tenants, the kind who just stop paying rent and then trash the place causing thousands of pounds of damage.

And yes, it's not as liquid as other investments, but I think the major attraction when BTL first took off was that people were investing in bricks and mortar, they had a real, tangible asset, and that was important to them because people had been bitten by those other 'liquid' types of investments, ie people lost their pensions, think Robert Maxwell looting Mirror group pension funds, the Rover (car company) pension scandal, (plus the way companies could take pensions holidays in the good times, leaving the pension funds screwed in the bad times, was always odd). And then there was the collapse of Northern Rock. Plus the financial crisis. And stocks and shares were problematic, because companies could go bust. So people, especially ordinary working people, lost trust in businesses and the markets to look after their money, given that it could disappear in an instant.

Given the low levels of financial literacy, and literacy in general - the average adult reading age in the UK is nine-years-old, not everyone has the capacity to research and do their due diligence into different types of investment classes, weigh up the risks, etc. I suspect most people wouldn't know where to start looking to do the research. And aside from the occasional fluctuations and market corrections, property was seen as a good investment, overall. So people stick to what they know. And when what they know is that the houses on their street have perhaps doubled in price over the past X number of years, and the interest on their savings account was probably 0.1 per cent for at least part of that time. So it seems like a no brainer. Lots of people go into BTL very naively, not having a clue what they're doing, though, so undoubtedly some will lose out because of that.
Sorry for the derail but the bit in bold isn’t the case I don’t think - see stats here which suggest 1 adult in 7 has that reading age:


I agree with the point you’re making about low financial literacy though.
 
Personally I'd pay it off any get it out of the way and pay for the loft conversion separately at a later date with no pressure. . . . because that's my plan.
My mortgage went down and down because I had an interest only mortgage with reduced payments. I kept chucking money at it whenever I could.
This has made life (especially now) a lot easier in an uncertain world. I could have kept the mortgage going and extended it to pay for the attic conversion, but it was too much stress with everything else going on at the moment, and I just didn't want it hanging over my head.

I am always keen to pay things off and get them out of the way first though. I absolutely hate being in debt.
 
Ann, you’re kind of proving my point that people do BTL not because it’s a good idea but because property is all they know. Which gives the reason why they do it if unadvised, but doesn’t mean they should be advised to do it.

The amount of financial literacy you need to buy a worldwide index tracker is about 1% of the financial literacy you need to buy a BTL property. The very fact that your post talks about people buying flats without really having analysed the transaction doesn’t show you don’t need financial literacy to do BTL, it just shows that people are doing it naively. Again, I would not advise people to make a large financial commitment unadvisedly.

You also exhibit a lot of the classic confused statements about other elements of equity investment (like referring to “bricks and mortar” and the Maxwell fraud — companies are also real world entities, and the Maxwell fraud was absolutely nothing to do with equity investment). But I think arguing about individual fallacies is a distraction from this thread and what Cloo should do. The key point is really that naive investment doesn’t become a good idea just because you haven’t analysed it or understood the alternatives.
Well, yes, quite. Because I was actually agreeing with you.

You seem to have misunderstood my post. You seem to think that I was disagreeing with you. I wasn't.

You seem to have misunderstood my comment about people's naivety re getting into BTLs as somehow that means I'm advocating anyone can do it because they don't need to know what they're doing. That's not what I was getting at, at all. It's actually horrifying, the number of amateur landlords who have an almost total lack of knowledge as to what their legal and financial responsibilities are and what their tenant's rights are.

You seem to be stating that you wouldn't advise people to do that, ie get a BTL, as if you're contradicting my advice to do so.

You seem to have misunderstood and thought I'm advising Cloo to buy a BTL or something? Because I haven't done anything of the sort.

I didn't advise anyone to do so. I was simply making observations, about people's motivations, ie distrust of corporations and financial institutions, and also some people's failures to properly research what they're getting into.

Your post seemed to be along the lines of BTLs are bad, why on earth would someone do that when there are other better options like xyz available?

So I was explaining the mentality and thought processes of how and why people got into BTL, and how historically, for many people, buying a BTL was perceived to be 'as safe as houses' whereas many people have felt increasingly reluctant to rely on their company pension in retirement (fraud, as mentioned, erosion of final salary schemes), plus the other factors such as financial institutions going bust, companies going bust and share certificates becoming worthless, etc.

I wasn't confusing Maxwell with equities, I clearly referenced it as a problem regarding pensions, because it and other pensions fraud/collapse cases caused many people to feel like they can't necessarily trust/rely 100 per cent on company pensions, so they wanted to invest in something tangible and which they thought they understood - and, yes, of course, understanding the superficial aspects of buying a property and getting rental income and benefiting in the long run from increased house prices isn't the same as people doing their research and, as mentioned, understanding all their legal obligations and tenants rights.

But for the avoidance of doubt, again, no I wasn't suggesting or advising Cloo or anyone else to buy a BTL.
 
So loft guy has got back to me, it's about 30% more expensive than original quote, which is interesting. I wonder if this is because he was quite pricey in the first place (but with excellent rep) so he's not actually having to hoik up as much. That probably still makes it too much of a stretch for the mo if we want anything left over but house priorities and finances to be discussed with husband and financial advisor.
 
Also, I guess that there's a lower ratio of materials to labour on a loft conversion to an extension, as it's materials that have seen the highest price rises.
 
Most of this discussion has gone right over my head because finances give me a headache.

I do feel a bit sad about the BTL discussion though. It’s all equities this, offsets that, blah blah blah but this is people’s homes we’re talking about.

I just don’t think we should be encouraging people becoming landlords to boost their income without thinking about all the other pressures and responsibilities that comes with it. Can you be a good landlord and do you give enough of a shit about other people to do it well?

I’m probably being hopelessly sentimental but I’m good with that tbh.
 
Back
Top Bottom