Corax
Luke 5:16
No, it's really not.You want evidence that nonces don't tend to broadcast the fact? The majority of the country finding it unpalatable with people prepared to smash their teeth in over it isn't an obvious indicator?
Fuckin 'ell.
Living off the land 100%
- Thread starter Stanley Edwards
- Start date
Fuckin 'ell.
No, it's really not.
Fuckin 'ell.
Maybe you can point to all the nonces who DO broadcast the fact?
Which you won't be able to. As criminals tend to not want to get caught or exposed.
Corax
Luke 5:16
A great many of those involved in the Savile and related inquiry. A bloke from my school (not when I was there, fortunately) who got done many years after, despite always having the long-standing nickname of 'Paedo Jones' who's now chatting with coppers. Many, many, others. Are you really this fucking thick?
It's about power ffs. You don't think that bragging about it gives some of these fucks a thrill? Are you really this fucking stupid?
Last edited:
Someone had a nickname means they broadcasted it.
Yep, I must be thick.
Any other shit examples?
Nicknames come from others, not the recipient.
So we've gone from me saying paedophiles don't tend to broadcast the fact, a factual and non controversial view, to me 'defending paedophiles'.
I think you need to take a break or something.
You're not making sense. Or not to me mate.
If someone had the nickname 'pedo pete' (or whatever) it'll be from whisperings and not him himself, in my view.
And you're providing one example from (I assume) years ago that can't be independently verified. You asked me for sources as to why it doesn't happen. I provided one with the Oxford case, which isn't something that's just hearsay.
If someone had the nickname 'pedo pete' (or whatever) it'll be from whisperings and not him himself, in my view.
And you're providing one example from (I assume) years ago that can't be independently verified. You asked me for sources as to why it doesn't happen. I provided one with the Oxford case, which isn't something that's just hearsay.
Corax
Luke 5:16
For context - said paedo was certainly a paedo, and everyone at the school knew it. The name has been changed as a court case is ongoing, but yes, it was well known that he was a paedo. As I stated, not whilst I was at that school, but it happens to be that he wasn't an isolated... case. More cases are also making their way through the judicial system.
And do these cunts broadcast it? Yes. They do. They get a kick out of it. There's no reason to assume otherwise in SE's case.
I apologise if I've been a bit OTT in my responses to you, but it's a bit close to the bone. Yes, paedophile cunts will very happily broadcast such things, which is where we came in to this discussion I think.
I think in many cases they get a kick out of doing so. Have you considered that?
And do these cunts broadcast it? Yes. They do. They get a kick out of it. There's no reason to assume otherwise in SE's case.
I apologise if I've been a bit OTT in my responses to you, but it's a bit close to the bone. Yes, paedophile cunts will very happily broadcast such things, which is where we came in to this discussion I think.
I think in many cases they get a kick out of doing so. Have you considered that?
Last edited:
But something being 'well known' is the point of contention. Savile was 'well known' to be a paedopohile, but that came from testimonies and suspicions and not Savile himself who went to great lengths to protect himself from the accusations.
If you say this teacher was walking around telling everyone he was abusing kids I guess I'll have to accept it as I can't prove otherwise.
But I'd still argue it's the exception rather than the rule. Wouldn't you?
If you say this teacher was walking around telling everyone he was abusing kids I guess I'll have to accept it as I can't prove otherwise.
But I'd still argue it's the exception rather than the rule. Wouldn't you?
Corax
Luke 5:16
Not really, no.
Said teacher had the nickname 'paedo' for several decades. It wasn't even thought of, really, his name was simply 'Paedo Bloggs'. That wasn't some sort of 'secret' nickname - fuck, as far as the kids were concerned it was just what was on his birth certificate.
For that to be the case, don't you think that at some point someone in authority might have cocked their head and thought... 'hang on'...?
And if so, do you really think my school was unique?
I Don't.
From what I've learned then yes, they do fucking broadcast it. It gives them a boner.
So again - at what point do the Red Flags get raised? At what point does a poster with SE's history become less of a 'lol' and more of an 'OMG'? The posting history of him as a sexual predator with underage fantasies is all there, I'm not going to lay it out.
Last edited:
Ok you ignored the face saving way out. Do you have any examples other than any only you can testify you bullshitting cunt?
Corax
Luke 5:16
That's vile. Utterly vile.
But, ignoring your implication that I've fabricated child abuse... have you read the report on Savile et al?
-------------
Meh - I hoped to avoid it by doing hypotheticals instead, but at this point may as well double down:
I was abused by paedophiles. They certainly broadcast it. It was well known, public knowledge, for a very long period of time. No one said shit. Yes, I'm currently in conversation with the feds.
Fuck you Magnus McGinty you foetid cunt.
------------
I may, however, just be being a "bullshitting cunt"
So yes, paedophiles certainly do broadcast their activities.
Last edited:
I suspected this was going to be the end point and I'm sorry. But I haven't expressed one view that 'defends peadophiles' which you earlier claimed.
Corax
Luke 5:16
No, you're not.
Last edited:
There's little point in continuing this discussion as you appear to be projecting your own experiences onto people you've never met and as a victim anything I say from here on in will make me look a cunt. So find someone else to spar with.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
no, i think there's mileage in the thread yet
Corax
Luke 5:16
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Stanley Edwards
just to return briefly to your downs woman incident
in 2011 your rucksack weighed 40kg, about 88lb. but by 2017 it had lightened to 30kg, about 66lb.
just to return briefly to your downs woman incident
in 2011 your rucksack weighed 40kg, about 88lb. but by 2017 it had lightened to 30kg, about 66lb.
what did you take out in the intervening six years?
bimble
floofy
Meanwhile.. yesterday's foraging, revealed.
(he bought some shrimps in a shop).
(he bought some shrimps in a shop).
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Stan's a twat but a lot of what he posts is pissed-up bullshit. Even if he was a danger to anyone (I doubt he is), nothing he's actually posted here, that I'm aware of, would be of particular interest to anyone that you might consider reporting it too. The DS girl and the nude painting are probably fantasy, and comparisons to Jimmy Savile are bang out of order.
Last edited:
rekil
to menny cranks
I don't get this "probably fantasy" thing. I don't see any reason to think the supermarket incident didn't happen -- it's hardly an unlikely sequence of events -- and the nude painting was a story that was told as it happened with a great deal of axiopisty. It most definitely had the ring of truth for me, including the sequence of events that led up to the woman putting distance between herself and Stan (contrary to his claims about how everybody loves him, that incident also included him being violent towards somebody else) and the stalking of her that then took place that resulted in her father having to intervene. It seems much more unlikely for that chaotic sequence to be made up by somebody to some bizarre end.
not-bono-ever
meh
SE is in control - blog comments have been cleansed.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
depends on the comparison
