Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

List the films you've seen at the cinema: 2017

1900. Bertolucci's five and a half hour epic of life in the Po Valley in the first half of the 30th century. Interesting politically, well shot but pretty flawed.

Very black and white and would've massively benefitted from more grey. And for all its length, left feeling I learned very little about the characters involved, especially De Niro's.
 
The Handmaiden. Fabulous. Quite pornographic. Beautiful film. Great story. Wouldn't want to say more as I went knowing nothing whatsoever about it and profited.
 
Neruda

Neruda (2016) - IMDb

Saw this with my Spanish partner.

A few asides. My Spanish partner when she heard about this film said we had to see it. For someone from her background. A grandfather imprisoned by Franco. A family background which is still socialist. Like South America where which side you are on has consequences, Neruda is a towering figure.

I came to it knowing nothing about Neruda. He was a great poet and also a politician. In Spain and South America art and politics go together.

I would call this an "art film". It's not a straight forward bio of Neruda. It's quite a surreal film. It about a real event in Neruda's life when he ,as a leading member of the Chilean Communist Party, had to flee an oppressive right wing government in late 40s.

A policeman is give the task of hunting him down.

Nothing is quite what it seems. Is the cop a figment of Neruda's imagination? Are we watching not reality but a mixture of reality and imagination?

It's one of those films that makes one want to know more.

My first impression from seeing the film was that the cop was the internalised figure of the right wing oppressive state one is in dialogue with. The cop is not some kind of stereotypical fascist. (Pinochet makes a brief appearance in the film as the head of a prison camp for leftists. Historically accurate I read later). The tragedy of the film is that they never meet.

My Spanish partner wished more for a film showing him as a great man of the left. For people like her he is up there with heroes like Che. Neruda's connection with Spain is that he was a diplomat in Spain during the civil war and helped Spanish communists get asylum in Chile. It was his experience in Spain that led him to being a committed Communist.

Does it work as a film? Yes imo. I liked the way it was not a standard biographical film nor a realist one. This isn't Ken Loach. It's also not uncritical of Neruda.

I read a few interviews with the director afterwards. Here is most illuminating one.


Omnipresent Poet: How Pablo Larraín Captured the Essence of Neruda Without Simplifying His Humanity | Filmmaker Magazine

Here the director says he was influenced by the writing of Borges. I haven't read Borges. I have read Bolano ( his novel 2666). Which is a mixture of true life events and fictionalised characters. Done in a way that does not pretend to be a linear narrative. In the film there are moments when the illusion of reality is undercut when the cop has it explained to him that he is a figment of Neruda's imagination. Something he counters by thinking he can still create his own destiny.

The film is also about the illusion we create of our own lives. How we fit others to play a part in the drama we create.

I would recommend seeing it. It's not an easy film but one worth following up with further reading. And that's not a criticism.
 
Fast & Furious 8

This is the first one in the series that I've seen in the cinema, previous to this I've only seen 5 and 6 on the TV so I'm bound to say 8 is much better than 5 and 6. Jason Statham really entertains.
 
The Handmaiden. Fabulous. Quite pornographic. Beautiful film. Great story. Wouldn't want to say more as I went knowing nothing whatsoever about it and profited.
Yes it's excellent - did you see the long version, the directors cut? I only saw the shorter version, but even that clocks in at 144 mins, which was long enough for me - not that it felt overly long, but I didn't feel that I'd missed out on anything, except maybe...
a lot more nasty torture!
 
Yes it's excellent - did you see the long version, the directors cut? I only saw the shorter version, but even that clocks in at 144 mins, which was long enough for me - not that it felt overly long, but I didn't feel that I'd missed out on anything, except maybe...
a lot more nasty torture!

oh I don't know! I'll try and find out. eta - although 144 mins sounds about right.
 
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
Reminded how powerful a film it is again, those close ups, every twitch, grimace and scowl in your face. Happiness, sadness and futility. The acting, the characters, everything is absolutely top notch.
 
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
Reminded how powerful a film it is again, those close ups, every twitch, grimace and scowl in your face. Happiness, sadness and futility. The acting, the characters, everything is absolutely top notch.
Going to see it on Thursday. Never seen it on the big screen so looking forward to that.
 
Going to see it on Thursday. Never seen it on the big screen so looking forward to that.

What did you think? How good was the copy?

The copy I saw in Huddersfield wasn't that good, but not bad enough to spoil it. Or maybe we are just used to digital. (guessing the copy was on acetate)
 
What did you think? How good was the copy?

The copy I saw in Huddersfield wasn't that good, but not bad enough to spoil it. Or maybe we are just used to digital. (guessing the copy was on acetate)
It was really good, as was the print.
 
Dunno why I torture myself reading this thread. I can't do films. Or indeed, any moving screen stuff at all. No matter how thrilling, gripping or gorgeous, within the first few minutes, it's like a sort of visual hay fever - a positive storm of sniffing, foot tapping, ear-pulling, twitching and grunting erupts...while my brain goes instantly AWOL. What the fuck is the matter with me?
 
Dunno why I torture myself reading this thread. I can't do films. Or indeed, any moving screen stuff at all. No matter how thrilling, gripping or gorgeous, within the first few minutes, it's like a sort of visual hay fever - a positive storm of sniffing, foot tapping, ear-pulling, twitching and grunting erupts...while my brain goes instantly AWOL. What the fuck is the matter with me?
ADHD?
 
Dunno why I torture myself reading this thread. I can't do films. Or indeed, any moving screen stuff at all. No matter how thrilling, gripping or gorgeous, within the first few minutes, it's like a sort of visual hay fever - a positive storm of sniffing, foot tapping, ear-pulling, twitching and grunting erupts...while my brain goes instantly AWOL. What the fuck is the matter with me?

Was you sat next me seeing Rouge One? :)

Sorry to hear of your problem.
 

Late onset ADHD? I used to watch films...in fact, I liked nothing better than to slope off in the middle of the day and catch a matinee...but sometime in my 30s, I just started losing the ability to concentrate (I don't do TV either). Or loud music. Or parties. Or people, in groups of more than one.

I think I am just a miserable old bastard.
 
Late onset ADHD? I used to watch films...in fact, I liked nothing better than to slope off in the middle of the day and catch a matinee...but sometime in my 30s, I just started losing the ability to concentrate (I don't do TV either). Or loud music. Or parties. Or people, in groups of more than one.

I think I am just a miserable old bastard.
I know what you mean. In my 20s I was down the trendy cinemas all the time, watching the latest Japanese import oh it's pretty obscure you probably haven't heard of it. Now you have to basically lock me on a train or a plane to get me to sit still for long enough to watch anything, and for the first 20 minutes it's torture. Same with books tbh. I blame work.
 
Unforgettable

Katherine Heigl plays a psycho, blonde divorcee with ultra straight hair and immaculate dress sense who's jealousy is unleashed when she finds out her ex husband has a new girlfriend.
Cliched; but enjoyable. Heigl excels in this role
 
Their Finest.

It's brilliant. Probably the best British Film for the last couple of years. Go and see it. It's got almost everything.
 
Great, thanks for that info, very informative. FFS the Paul Ross's have destroyed this thread.

If fact would anyone else be interested in a new film thread? I've been thinking of starting one for a while now, one of the problems with this thread this year is that we've lost people like Reno, who are tending to watch more stuff at home than at the cinema, while gaining the Paul Ross's.

So I was thinking about a new thread that would be for films but not make any distinction between the cinema or home, and with provision that people should at give at least some fucking f the films they've seen in their posts. I'm not asking for posts as long as Gramsci's above (though that would be very welcome) but just the type of posts people used to make in previous years. Anyone else interested? Or should we just continue with this thread and try to tune out the "Great!" wankers?
 
Great, thanks for that info, very informative. FFS the Paul Ross's have destroyed this thread.

If fact would anyone else be interested in a new film thread? I've been thinking of starting one for a while now, one of the problems with this thread this year is that we've lost people like Reno, who are tending to watch more stuff at home than at the cinema, while gaining the Paul Ross's.

So I was thinking about a new thread that would be for films but not make any distinction between the cinema or home, and with provision that people should at give at least some fucking f the films they've seen in their posts. I'm not asking for posts as long as Gramsci's above (though that would be very welcome) but just the type of posts people used to make in previous years. Anyone else interested? Or should we just continue with this thread and try to tune out the "Great!" wankers?

I also dropped off this thread for various personal reasons. Main one being straightened circumstances and increasing cost of seeing films in cinemas in London has meant I haven't been seeing that much.

I'm now back. But seeing films in cinema more like once a month. Ticket prices in London are excluding a section of the population. Been using the Peckhamplex. But that's now under threat.

There are several good posters who seem to be missing.

There is already thread on DVDs seen at home?

I still think thread for film seen at cinemas is still worth a go.

But will think on it.
 
Great, thanks for that info, very informative. FFS the Paul Ross's have destroyed this thread.

If fact would anyone else be interested in a new film thread? I've been thinking of starting one for a while now, one of the problems with this thread this year is that we've lost people like Reno, who are tending to watch more stuff at home than at the cinema, while gaining the Paul Ross's.

So I was thinking about a new thread that would be for films but not make any distinction between the cinema or home, and with provision that people should at give at least some fucking f the films they've seen in their posts. I'm not asking for posts as long as Gramsci's above (though that would be very welcome) but just the type of posts people used to make in previous years. Anyone else interested? Or should we just continue with this thread and try to tune out the "Great!" wankers?
we've already got a thread for that.

I think there's room for the Rosses as well as the Kaels. I find both ways of reviewing films instructive and amusing.
 
There is already thread on DVDs seen at home?
we've already got a thread for that.
That's for everything tho, films, TV series whatever, and it suffers from some of the same problems this one does. I was thinking of a thread just for film discussion but not specifically for films at the cinema so that we could attract people who, for the reasons who mentioned, don't go to the cinema that often.

I still think thread for film seen at cinemas is still worth a go.
Maybe, but this one isn't.
 
That's for everything tho, films, TV series whatever, and it suffers from some of the same problems this one does. I was thinking of a thread just for film discussion but not specifically for films at the cinema so that we could attract people who, for the reasons who mentioned, don't go to the cinema that often.

Maybe, but this one isn't.
i think one size fits all is cool - there's room for all sort of discussion. it's not up to anyone but the posters themselves on how they contribute. tweet length reviews should be able to sit alongside cahiers du cinema epics. i think it's a bit snobbish to say this thread is ruined cos you expect everyone on it to write essays.
I don't always want to spend more than a couple of sentence talking about a film I've seen. Sometimes I've got the time and inclination to go into more detail. Sometimes I haven't. I'm sure it's the same for others. The other thread has one sentence reviews on it as well as more eloquent reviews from people like trabuquera
They're all of value.
 
Back
Top Bottom