Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

List the films you've seen at the cinema: 2016

Hail Caesar! - the Coen Brothers show off their intimate knowledge of the history of cinema and film-making by making a Wes Anderson movie.

Saw this earlier. Having grown up with musicals (my Mum), Westerns (my Dad) and Biblical epics (both), it made me laugh. So slight but fun. Also thought Channing Tatum was really good -- normally find him a bit dull so was quite surprised.
 
10 Cloverfield Lane - a pretty good, suspenseful story that started a bit slowly but got better as it went along. Good performances from John Goodman and Mary Elizabeth Winstead. Much better than I was anticipating.
 
The Miracle of Morgan's Creek. Preston Sturges screwball comedy. Amazed they got it past the censors. Fab.

Sorrentino double bill -- The Consequences of Love and Youth. Toni Servillo (excellent) plays a sad and lonely man stuck in a hotel in Switzerland for reasons that are unclear till the end. Youth, his latest with Michael Caine and Harvey Keitel as ageing men reflecting on their lives. Too long, some bits that really didn't work (Paloma Faith :confused:, creepy ogling of women), not his best work.

Hitchcock Truffaut. Excellent.

I've also been to two new (for me) cinemas this week. The Regent St Cinema which I thought was quite lovely and Picturehouse Central -- if the Curzon Soho goes, can see me going to this more.
 
I took my fellah to see Deadpool last week. More his thing than mine but I really enjoyed it. I drank a bottle of wine prior to the performance so that might not have been wholly down to the film quality.

Though it is probbaly the best of this sort of movie I've seen. I find most superhero things so tedious I can't get through them
 
High-Rise. I was so looking forward to this -- love JG Ballard and think Ben Wheatley's an interesting director -- but this is a mess. Events unfold without any context and there's no attempt to explain/understand why people act as they do. It looks good but it's difficult to care about any of it really.

I went with a friend who hadn't read the book and he'd no idea what was going on and thought it was a bit boring. I can see his point. Really disappointing.
 
High-Rise. I was so looking forward to this -- love JG Ballard and think Ben Wheatley's an interesting director -- but this is a mess. Events unfold without any context and there's no attempt to explain/understand why people act as they do. It looks good but it's difficult to care about any of it really.

I went with a friend who hadn't read the book and he'd no idea what was going on and thought it was a bit boring. I can see his point. Really disappointing.
Agreed. It was ok for the first 30-40 mins but after that it became increasingly tedious to the point where I couldn't give a shit and wanted it to end. If I'd gone on my own I think I might have left early (like some others noticeably did) but I stuck it out as I was with Mrs F (who enjoyed it more that I did). It's style is reminiscent of Kubrik, Roeg and Ken Russell but without the wit or narrative coherence. I'll admit there were a few moments that I found amusing, but all too few to make it entertaining. The thing I liked best in it was actually Portishead's version of Abba's SOS, which I thought would have been a good end point - well I hoped it would end there, but sadly it dragged on for about another 20 mins. It's running time is 2hrs but it felt a lot longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
What a shame about High Rise, I've read a few reviews which say the same thing. It was one of my most anticipated films, but now I'll probably wait to watch it at home.
 
What a shame about High Rise, I've read a few reviews which say the same thing. It was one of my most anticipated films, but now I'll probably wait to watch it at home.

It is a shame, I was really looking forwad to it too.

Hadn't read any reviews before I went to see it (I generally don't as half the time they contain spoilers) but looking at them this morning, lots of reviewers seemed to really like it. Be interested to hear what you think when you've seen it.
 
It is a shame, I was really looking forwad to it too.

Hadn't read any reviews before I went to see it (I generally don't as half the time they contain spoilers) but looking at them this morning, lots of reviewers seemed to really like it. Be interested to hear what you think when you've seen it.
It got generally favourable reviews, but not as many truly enthusiastic ones as you'd expect for a film like this (literary adaptation of admired author by admired director) and the ones who don't like it all have complained that the film descends into chaos in the second half. I'm generally not sure how sold I'm on Ben Wheatley. I loved Kill List but thought his other films were a little over-praised and A Field in England sent me to sleep.
 
Last edited:
I saw it today and really liked it. Amazing production design and soundtrack. Not particularly coherent, but I didn't care. Beautiful people eating dogs while Can's Spoon and some mental Amon Duul track plays in the background, against a fabricated CGI Brutalist backdrop is good enough for me.
 
10 Cloverfield Lane - a pretty good, suspenseful story that started a bit slowly but got better as it went along. Good performances from John Goodman and Mary Elizabeth Winstead. Much better than I was anticipating.
I thought it was decent right up until...
tumblr_m5f6g8wtKP1qe80mfo1_1280.png
 
i really enjoyed High Rise, i agree it does start to lose its way a bit towards the end, but i always thought the book did that too.
 
I wanna go and see High Rise, but ama bit scared that it'll be really disappointing
Saw it on Saturday, really enjoyed it. As you'd expect with a Ballard book, plenty of rave reviews alongside equal numbers of bad ones. It's hard to empathise with any of the characters but, again, that's what you'd expect with Ballard. Nicely filmed, good music and the building itself is part of the madness - all good.
 
...and the ones who don't like it all have complained that the film descends into chaos in the second half...

That's a Ballard trademark, surely

I liked the film. I haven't read the book but have read plenty of Ballard's others . Anyone expecting a steady narrative flow will be disappointed . They'd be better off with a superhero film :p.
 
That's a Ballard trademark, surely

I liked the film. I haven't read the book but have read plenty of Ballard's others . Anyone expecting a steady narrative flow will be disappointed . They'd be better off with a superhero film :p.
Especially 'The Atrocity Exhibition'; now I really would like to see someone try to feature film that!*

*am aware of Wiess work.
 
I have to admit that I didn't particularely enjoy reading Crash and that I preferred the Cronenberg film to the book. I liked Empire of the Sun which I suppose is his most accessible book, but after Crash I never read any of his other science fiction novels (if Crash can even be called that)
 
I have to admit that I didn't particularely enjoy reading Crash and that I preferred the Cronenberg film to the book. I liked Empire of the Sun which I suppose is his most accessible book, but after Crash I never read any of his other science fiction novels (if Crash can even be called that)

Science fiction? I wouldn't call many of them that.

There's nothing wrong with a bit of sci fi but of the ones I can remember Kingdom Come, Super Cannes, Cocaine Nights and I guess High Rise aren't sci fi. They show what our society is and could become. Soc fi?
 
Science fiction? I wouldn't call many of them that.

There's nothing wrong with a bit of sci fi but of the ones I can remember Kingdom Come, Super Cannes, Cocaine Nights and I guess High Rise aren't sci fi. They show what our society is and could become. Soc fi?

There is plenty of science fiction which deals with the very near future and/or sociology. Ballard has written science fiction, but I suppose the correct term for something like Crash is "speculative fiction" as it is based on a fictitious underground society based around a current technology.
 
Back
Top Bottom