Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

List the films you've seen at the cinema: 2013

Frances Ha - I won't bother repeating what others have already said, but like Reno, Sue etc I really enjoyed it.

Upstream Color - Fantastic, looks beautiful and very emotional despite the fact that the plot is so ambiguous. THe lead female actor is excellent, her performance really allows you to connect with the film despite the fact that you aren't entirely sure of what's going on. It could have been a very cold film but it actually isn't and I found it really moving. Certainly in my top five films of the year.

What Maise Knew - A not bad adaptation of the Henry James book (which I've never read) updated to the modern day. I felt that the parents were so unsympathetic and the step-partents so nice that any sort of ambiguity was missed. Steve Coogan wasn't bad as the father, it's a decent enough two hours but is nothing compared to the other two films

Upstream Color. Enjoyed it, if I really have very little idea what is was all about.

What Maisie Knew. Agreed. Not bad -- could've been dreadful.

Bonjour Tristesse. I've read the book but never seen the film. Thought it was a bit strange -- very dated in some ways but the touchy feely relationship between David Niven and Jean Seberg was bit uncomfortable.
 
Bonjour Tristesse. I've read the book but never seen the film. Thought it was a bit strange -- very dated in some ways but the touchy feely relationship between David Niven and Jean Seberg was bit uncomfortable.
Yes, it's not terrible but it's definitely not one of Preminger's best.
 
Les Invisibles. French documentary about elderly gay people talking about their lives, with interesting stuff about the fight for gay/abortion/contraceptive rights -- apparently homosexuality was classed as a mental illness in France until 1981. Funny and moving.
 
The Great Beauty. More a series of of vaguely connected scenes than a proper storyline but could've sat and watched this for hours and hours. Looks absolutely beautiful. It reminded me a bit of Holy Motors in that even if you're not quite sure what's going on, it's still really entrancing.
 
No it isn't. Its not especially 'cinematic' but its fucking funny, maintains its pace for the entire 90 minutes and expands characters which have only been peripheral before. Brilliant.
 
I think it's hilarious for the first act, quite a bit less hilarious for the second, then so atrocious for the third act (from when he loses his pants), that all hilarity from before is forgotten.
 
So do most, it seems. Went with a couple of mates and we three remained stony faced at Alan dangling from a window and lying in a septic tank, while all around us guffawed.
Lots of people think Lee Nelson is funny mind.
There's no accounting for taste
 
Pain & Gain. Entertaining black crime-gone-wrong comedy. Some ace lines -- 'don't be a don't-er, do be a do-er.'

Even better, discovered the Genesis in Mile End Road is £3.50 all day on a Wednesday. Never been there before but nice building, if it was bloody freezing.
 
Stoker - After some of the reviews it got on here I didn't go into this expecting much but I quite liked it. It's not Shadow of a Doubt, but didn't dislike it. I thought Matthew Goode was pretty good and the sets/props/customs were excellent.

Man of the West & The Man From Laramie - First two films in the Anthony Mann mini-season at the Melbourne Cinematheque. Mann is a personal favourite and I've seen both before but it's wonderful to see them on the big screen. Unfortunately the print for Man of the West was only 16 mm and not in best of condition but The Man from Laramie looked fantastic - the dusk scenes are really evocative.
 
The Great Beauty. More a series of of vaguely connected scenes than a proper storyline but could've sat and watched this for hours and hours. Looks absolutely beautiful. It reminded me a bit of Holy Motors in that even if you're not quite sure what's going on, it's still really entrancing.
Yes and no. It certainly looks great, no argument there, but there's a much more coherent story than Holy Motors. It doesn't always hang together in a clear way but there's a coherent narrative about a man trying to find some meaning and spirtuality in a life which he's frittered away in an endless round of partying, fashion and arts events with a vacuous social circle. He's lived the life that the he wanted to, but now wonders what the point of it all was. And man, I know just how he feels! I thought it was brilliant, and very funny sometimes too.
 
Yes and no. It certainly looks great, no argument there, but there's a much more coherent story than Holy Motors. It doesn't always hang together in a clear way but there's a coherent narrative about a man trying to find some meaning and spirtuality in a life which he's frittered away in an endless round of partying, fashion and arts events with a vacuous social circle. He's lived the life that the he wanted to, but now wonders what the point of it all was. And man, I know just how he feels! I thought it was brilliant, and very funny sometimes too.

There's a general theme of regret and emptiness but don't really agree there's much of a coherent narrative. Still, think we agree it's a great film ;-).

And funny. Loved the interview with the performance artist...
 
Blue Jasmine - I don't know what the critics who gave this 4/5 stars are on but it should be made illegal as it obviously causes you to make very stupid choices. While it doesn't reach the nadir of Scoop or Cassandra's Dream it's still pretty bad. I found it far less enjoyable than even Vicky Christina Barcelona and Midnight in Paris which while they were pretty average had enough in them that I didn't find the 90 minutes they lasted totally worthless. This on the other hand couldn't end soon enough for me, the characters were so one-dimensional and unlikable that I just wanted to get away. Drawing with Broken for the worst thing I've seen at the cinema this year.
 
Last edited:
Rush. James Hunt and Nicki Lauda battle it out. Very well filmed racing sequences. Enjoyed it.
 
Rush. James Hunt and Nicki Lauda battle it out. Very well filmed racing sequences. Enjoyed it.

Thought it was really good, Daniel Brühl should get an oscar nomination, hangs together well as a film, though the real events had even more drama:the near riot at the British Grand Prix.
Tend the avoid films with a massive marketing spend, but this one deserved to be more than 3/4 full on the Saturday night of first week of release
 
Too many films to list, but last night was spent at the marvellous Cheap Thrills Zero Budget film festival. 50 short films by a mix of kids, locals, oddballs and film students. Some hilarious, some gorgeous, some quite scary. HMA Tiffin and the one about the lost cats were my faves.

Coming to Loughborough soon too. http://www.zerobudgetfilmfest.com/
 
The Bling Ring - Considerable better than Sofia Coppola's last effort, Somewhere, it's not a major piece of work or anything but it's not bad. I didn't think Emma Watson was particularly good, she seemed far less natural than most of the other actors. Leslie Mann, as her mother, overdid it too IMO.

Then I continued with the Anthony Mann season
Bend of River - James Stewart is a reformed gunfighter leading a bunch of settlers into Oregon and trying to find a new life. Like all the Mann-Stewart westerns it's a classic.

Raw Deal - One of Mann's Noirs from the 40s. It's not a first rate noir and not a patch on his later films there are some good little moments in there. Raymond Burr plays the part of the mob boss and rather steals the show.
 
The Bling Ring - Considerable better than Sofia Coppola's last effort, Somewhere, it's not a major piece of work or anything but it's not bad. I didn't think Emma Watson was particularly good, she seemed far less natural than most of the other actors. Leslie Mann, as her mother, overdid it too IMO.
I'm glad I didn't see her last one then as this was so forgettable that I'd forgotten I'd seen it until you reminded me. If it hadn't been based on a true story I wouldn't have bothered at all. It wasn't terrible but there's not much to it. But I guess there's not that much to the original story either: bunch of dumb kids rob bunch of dumb celebs while they're out of town. I guess it says something that one of the victims, Paris Hilton (not really much of a victim though!) actually appears as herself, but what that says I'm not sure. Ultimately this was just a big 'so what'.
 
The Great Beauty. More a series of of vaguely connected scenes than a proper storyline but could've sat and watched this for hours and hours. Looks absolutely beautiful. It reminded me a bit of Holy Motors in that even if you're not quite sure what's going on, it's still really entrancing.
Loved this. Just point the camera at Rome and you've got something wonderful already. I wonder how many more amazing scenes didn't make it to the cut. Even the final credits are really atmospheric.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
last cinema film i saw was the original superman at prince charles.

really good. the origin story was great and christopher reeve totally sold clark and superman.

lex was a bit silver age so his stuff felt kinda like an adam west villian but that kinda was what comics were like
 
Went to see Metro Manila tonight. Strong story about a poor family who move to the city when they can't make a living farming. I found it easy to care about the characters and I liked the photography. I thought the score was a bit intrusive in places.
 
"Metro Manila"

At Ritzy this week.

Cracking crime thriller set in Philippines. Directed and produced by new British director Sean Ellis. Did well at Sundance ( the only festival that would give this film a chance.)
Its a genre crime film so the premise is not that original. But does that matter when its as well made as this film? With plenty of twists and turns. I have a soft spot for films where the honest little man trying to feed his family is up against it it the big bad world where only money talks.

Heard the director talking about the film after I had seen it. He wrote script in English and then filmed it in Manila. The subtitles were part of the film editing. So its not like a foreign language film with the subtitles put over the film. He made sure that the subtitles did not interfere with the look of the film.

Its also well acted and shot.
 
Saw "Rush" .

Its about the Formula one rivalry in 70s between Hunt and Lauda.

You do not have to be into Formula one to enjoy this film. Its about the rivalry between two men. This is the 70s and women are girlfriends and wives. No sign of feminism.

This film is almost old fashioned in the way that its made. It is unpretentious. Its not an art movie like "The Great Beauty". It tells a story. Its nostalgic about the 70s. This has been done before. The police tv series a while back for example (Life on Mars). 70s portrayed as a time when men ( and it is men) did not have to be part of the corporate world. Both Hunt and Lauda are in a way "drop outs". Both obsessed with speed and danger not money.

The film is unashamedly full of stereotypes. British amateurism versus Teutonic efficiency.

The film shows how dangerous it was in 70s. Which is true. It does not glamourize the risks. This helps to make the film work.

The film is evenly divided between the racing circuit and the lives off circuit of Hunt and Lauda.

The scenes on the track are very well done. Takes u right there and gives feeling of what it must have been like.

I would call this film part of the new successful genre of nostalgic film. Like "The Kings Speech". Class is there but treated uncritically. Individuals might not fit well into there class (King, Lauda , Hunt) but they do not go against it. Ultimately these two films want to go back to a time that never really existed. They present themselves as about individuals and how they surmount problems.
 
doc on Stuart Hall

It is worth seeing in the cinema. As with Akomfrah other work it is beautiful to look at.

It is a companion piece to Nine Muses. Nine Muses is a visual poem ( that is the only fitting way I can describe it). It uses footage of the Windrush generation coming to UK intercut with readings from the Odyssey and other works of literature. Not a straightforward history or sociological look at migration its more a psychological study using literature.

Likewise in this doc on Stuart Hall archive footage and voice of Stuart on various programmes over the years builds up a picture of the man and his work.

Plus the music if Miles Davis. Stuart is a great fan of his work. The doc cleverly used his music throughout the film.

It is riveting viewing and not your standard documentary.

Stuart Hall was a pioneer of modern cultural studies/ postcolonial studies. This doc shows how his own life lead him to questions of social theory. He grew up in Jamaica at the end of the colonial period. His parents a middle class Jamaican family.

The major theme running through his life and work is the idea of "Hybridity". He says the Caribbean is a hybrid culture. To the question of where he comes from he can say several places. His family ancestors are African, Portuguese, and possibly East Asian. This is the norm in the Caribbean.

He translates this to say that a component globalisation is hybridity. Cultures are not pure. Do not worry this film is not an Open University course. It is , like Stuart comes across, a very humane film.

Like the protagonists in the Nine Muses Stuart has always felt out of place in different degrees. That also is an effect of hybrid culture.

For him this is a positive. The film charts his life in Britain. From a committed youthful intellectual in the radical 60s to know.

In the film, its interesting that he comes across as almost at home in 60s early 70s Britain. At end of film he says he feels out of place in post Thatcherite society.

Cannot help feeling that the concept of hybridity as a positive has not turned out in the way that he foresaw. Modern Britain is a hybrid of neo liberalism and social liberalism. Modern Capitalism can accommodate itself to hybridity of culture. Or co opt it.

I also disagree with his idea that hybridity can be extrapolated globally. The Caribbean was made out of slavery and imperialism to produce a new hybrid society. But other parts of the world do not have this history. Japan for example was never colonised. It is not a hybrid society.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom