Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lambeth's plans to demolish Cressingham Gardens and other estates without the consent of residents

Noticed that the Lambeth planning website no longer posts objections, last objections posted on the site were in mid December. The Brixton Society sent in an objection on 21st December - still not on Lambeth's planning website - but you can read it on our website. http://www.brixtonsociety.org.uk/te.../2021/01/Ropers-Walk-SW2-2QN-20-02406-RG3.pdf

Yeah, I noticed the lack when posting objections for residents without internet. When I submitted it did confirm receipt, but the number of objections hasn't changed since 21st Dec.
 
Latest Lambeth news


 
Since when did it become the job of Lambeth planning officers to provide information that the developers army of paid consultants failed to provide? A good example of this is in the section of the officer's report which looks at the issue of views from the park and whether this would cause damage to the park's setting. The heritage and conservation report submitted by Homes for Lambeth hardly mentions this, and the only images supplied are about the impact on terraced housing in Trinity Rise (part of the park conservation area). Since then its clear that Lambeth planners received a large number of objections, from local amenity groups (the Friends of Brockwell Park, the Brixton Society, the Herne Hill Society) and from national bodies (the Twentieth Century Society, Save) arguing that the development would impact on views from Brockwell Park towards its larger unspoilt and sylvan north west boundary. It might have been a reasonable expectation that Lambeth planning officers would respond to this by deciding that the application fails to comply with Lambeth's local plan in relation to policies on heritage assets. No surprise to anyone reading this blog that they didn't. But not only that - the officers report to next week's meeting includes some "visualisations" which they claim back up the claim that the impact on the park would be minimal. If you're a developer, why bother to pay good money to planning consultants if Lambeth officers are willing to make up their deficiencies and work for free?
 
Just heard that the MP for Streatham (Bell Ribeiro Addy) which includes Cressingham, has applied to Lambeth's committee services team to speak agains the Ropers Walk application at the planning committee meeting on 9 Feb. Not sure how much difference this will make - Helen Hayes spoke out against the Hondo tower and PAC members voted it through anyway - but at least it's a change to see our local MP supporting local communities.
 
Just heard that the MP for Streatham (Bell Ribeiro Addy) which includes Cressingham, has applied to Lambeth's committee services team to speak agains the Ropers Walk application at the planning committee meeting on 9 Feb. Not sure how much difference this will make - Helen Hayes spoke out against the Hondo tower and PAC members voted it through anyway - but at least it's a change to see our local MP supporting local communities.
Bell Ribeiro Addy has been excellent on many issues.
 
Since when did it become the job of Lambeth planning officers to provide information that the developers army of paid consultants failed to provide? A good example of this is in the section of the officer's report which looks at the issue of views from the park and whether this would cause damage to the park's setting. The heritage and conservation report submitted by Homes for Lambeth hardly mentions this, and the only images supplied are about the impact on terraced housing in Trinity Rise (part of the park conservation area). Since then its clear that Lambeth planners received a large number of objections, from local amenity groups (the Friends of Brockwell Park, the Brixton Society, the Herne Hill Society) and from national bodies (the Twentieth Century Society, Save) arguing that the development would impact on views from Brockwell Park towards its larger unspoilt and sylvan north west boundary. It might have been a reasonable expectation that Lambeth planning officers would respond to this by deciding that the application fails to comply with Lambeth's local plan in relation to policies on heritage assets. No surprise to anyone reading this blog that they didn't. But not only that - the officers report to next week's meeting includes some "visualisations" which they claim back up the claim that the impact on the park would be minimal. If you're a developer, why bother to pay good money to planning consultants if Lambeth officers are willing to make up their deficiencies and work for free?


This appears to be the norm for planning officers now. Happened with Hondo.

After Hondo I wrote to my ward Cllrs to say I was concerned at how the planning department operate.

Instead of being neutral at planning committee meetings they take the side of the developer. I saw them do this with Hondo and Hero of Switzerland.

Imo planning officers job should be to present to committee the pros and cons of an application and aid Cllr in making a decision. Not presenting a one sided case which takes a determined Cllr like Ben Kind to oppose.

None of my Ward Cllrs took this seriously.

I think they are all scared of criticising how the system the run works.

Which is a it rubbish imo..
 
Agree it was a depressing meeting, with paid Lambeth officers acting as PR consultants for the developer and members of the committee failing to challenge officers when they provided obviously misleading information. Most blatant example of this was the statement by Lambeth's conservation officer that you wouldn't notice the new building from the park boundary as it would only be two metres higher than the existing one - as the rear section of the new block will be four storeys high and replaces one two storeys high must have been obvious that this couldn't be true (I went back and checked the elevation plans after the meeting and the rear of the block will actually be six metres higher than what's there now).

Only small ray of hope I thought was that three of the councillors wanted it to be recorded in the minutes of the meeting that they were "disappointed" that an application for a small section of the estate was being submitted in behalf of the Masterplan. The chair seemed to agree with them and said something along the lines that she was concerned they were only seeing "a small part of the jigsaw puzzle". If all this IS reflected in the official minutes of the meeting, then it might make it more difficult for Homes for Lambeth to get away with more applications like this one before they publish and consult on the Masterplan.
 
It's almost like they're gloating in their press release

Plans for 20 new affordable homes at Trinity Rise approved by Lambeth Council

Homes for Lambeth – Lambeth Council’s wholly owned housing delivery company – achieves another planning success, with 20 new affordable homes on Ropers Walk, Trinity Rise approved by Lambeth’s Planning Committee.

These much-needed new homes will provide affordable family-sized homes, with a communal landscaped garden for existing and future residents. The proposals also reduce carbon emissions by 80% exceeding target levels and contributing towards Lambeth Council’s commitment to be carbon neutral by 2030.

Commenting on the news, Jitinder Takhar, Chief Executive of Homes for Lambeth said:

“This marks another significant moment for Homes for Lambeth as we continue to increase the number of high-quality homes in Lambeth. The 20 new homes at Trinity Rise will also provide many more genuinely affordable new homes with 14 of the new homes at council-level rent.”

Councillor Matthew Bennett, Lambeth’s Lead Member for Planning, Investment & New Homes remarked:

“I’m delighted that these new homes have secured planning permission. This will see the amount of council housing at Trinity Rise more than double, with a nearly threefold increase in the number of family-sized council homes. These new homes will be larger than the ones they replace and will see an 80% reduction in carbon as part of our commitment to fighting the climate emergency.

“We set HFL up as a fully council-owned company to build more council and affordable homes to tackle the housing crisis here in Lambeth and provide better homes for local families. This is just the latest scheme to secure permission in an ambitious programme right across the borough.”


Caroline Pillay, Chair of Homes for Lambeth Group, welcomed the news and said:

At Homes for Lambeth, we are determined that we play our role in building the genuinely affordable homes which are so desperately needed, whilst tackling climate change. This application will make a significant contribution to making Lambeth greener and cleaner.”
 
members of the committee failing to challenge officers when they provided obviously misleading information.

This is consistently the case - I didn't watch this meeting, but have sat in on others. They fail to do their job. Even when things are laid out on a plate for them by objectors - they are given all the info they need to ask the significant questions, but they don't do anything with it. Instead they waste all the time asking stupid questions about minor aspects of the proposals. Very often, their questions demonstrate that they simply haven't understood important things about the application and/or have not spent any time looking at it in any detail.
 
Lambeth just can't get enough of flattening people's houses and cutting down trees

truslove-3.jpg


 
This is astonishing bullshit from Lambeth.

There is also the claim from the Committee that:
“Resident satisfaction was at 76%, and a review of the approach to resident satisfaction would be undertaken within the next 12 months.”
The minutes clarify that these figures are:

“Based on number of contact points with residents, not number of residents responding.”
No data is given explaining how many ‘contact points’ HfL has had with residents.


 

Lambeth is under investigation by the Housing Ombudsman for failing to comply with the watchdog’s new complaint-handling failure orders.

Another demonstration of the indifference to democratic scrutiny of the unaccountable one-party state that is Lambeth Council.
 
up date today:
Thank you all for your support!
As a consequence, we have been able to submit an application to the courts for a judicial review of the recent planning permission for the demolition of the Ropers Walk block on Cressingham Gardens. Now it is a period of waiting to see if a judge grants permission for the case to be heard in court.
Save Cressingham Gardens , organized by Gerlinde Gniewosz
 
Back
Top Bottom