So ViolentPanda (good to see you!) what does this mean? Is it all over now or are there other avenues they can try and pursue?
It's far from over. We still have the issue of Ropers Walk, which the cabinet meeting made clear is still on the table. We also have to play "wait and see" in order to find out what form these ballots take. Me, I won't be satisfied by anything less than independent balloting run by Electoral Reform Services or similar, & not some shoddy mob run by ex-Labour cllrs!So ViolentPanda (good to see you!) what does this mean? Is it all over now or are there other avenues they can try and pursue?
Thought it was probably too good to be true to think it was.It's far from over. We still have the issue of Ropers Walk, which the cabinet meeting made clear is still on the table. We also have to play "wait and see" in order to find out what form these ballots take. Me, I won't be satisfied by anything less than independent balloting run by Electoral Reform Services or similar, & not some shoddy mob run by ex-Labour cllrs!
So ViolentPanda (good to see you!) what does this mean? Is it all over now or are there other avenues they can try and pursue?
4.26.For Cressingham Gardens, the Council should re-engage genuinely with residents on their ideas for the future of the estate. We recognise ‘The People’s Plan’ as an example of one such resident contribution, but it will not be the only one.Resumption of genuine collaborative working with residents to work through the future of the estate would be a helpful way to rebuild trust with residents and to minimiselosing the estate from council ownership via Right to Transfer mechanisms.
It's far from over. We still have the issue of Ropers Walk, which the cabinet meeting made clear is still on the table. We also have to play "wait and see" in order to find out what form these ballots take. Me, I won't be satisfied by anything less than independent balloting run by Electoral Reform Services or similar, & not some shoddy mob run by ex-Labour cllrs!
It's far from over. We still have the issue of Ropers Walk, which the cabinet meeting made clear is still on the table. We also have to play "wait and see" in order to find out what form these ballots take. Me, I won't be satisfied by anything less than independent balloting run by Electoral Reform Services or similar, & not some shoddy mob run by ex-Labour cllrs!
[/QUOTE]Personally if the Council had taken the Kerslake report findings seriously they would have halted Ropers walk. And gone back to the drawing board.
A masterplan (as promised for Cressingham for what will be 10 yrs next year) is always "on the way", but never arrives, & CAN'T arrive because it would point up - couldn't help but point up - that Lambeth Council/HfL have done exactly what they claim they haven't: That is, they've been salami-slicing development in order to establish "beachheads" on regen estates.Instead of a proper master plan they decided to "chip away" at the estate piecemeal. Having a master plan would have shown what there intentions really were. That's how I understand it. Is this correct?
Not yet, but hopefully at some time soon. We've still got a war on our hands, though. We still have to protect Mrs Dotimas (the 85 year old freeholder LBL/HfL have been harassing for almost 3 years) & the rest of our community.Btw all the hard work you and other Cressingham residents have done has paid off.
Thing is, you handle it because the only other option is to give up. Most of us refuse to give up because this place is in our hearts. I won't leave here except in a box. Most of my life with Greebo is etched into this estate.I don't think I could have handled all the years of stress the Council put the residents on the estate through.
Thank you. You can bet - & I've heard some of the noises coming out of the cabinet - that they're mad as hell that Bayo Dosonmu commissioned this review, & that Kerslake made the findings that he did. You can also bet that senior officers & cabinet members will do their best to sabotage the ballot they have to give residents on Fenwick, Central Hill & Cressingham. We - the regen estates - are already emphasising that any ballots need to be run by a politically independent operation such as Electoral Reform Services, not by some polling or "comms" form with Labour affiliations. It's "keep on fighting till we've won". We can't rest on our laurels.You successfully slowed down Lambeth plans for the estate to extent that Lord Kerslake ( unlike three other estates) can say that has this has not progressed that far it should be re consulted on and HfL should not pursue this so called redevelopment of your estate.
So all respect to you for and others in your community for keeping up the struggle over the years.
Did you catch how Cameron was all "what about the residents!"? It's like she forgot that she was the person who offered our estate up to Pete "Liar" Robbins for regeneration. She's as dishonest as the day is long. As for Mary Atkins, glad she's gone. The only 1 who's done any good for residents on Cressingham is Ben Kind, who has at least pursued the housing dept about repairs - something Atkins & Cameron never did.What Kerslake does not go into is way you were let down by your local Labour Cllrs. Not in his brief.
It's harmed people's health, that much is obvious. We've had 2 suicides where we - the residents - KNOW that despair about the future was a factor, but as neither left notes, it's not something that can be proven.I think the stress of the threat of demolishion for over a decade is outrageous. How dare they.
They can't make up for the utter misery they have caused but I'd like to be hopeful. Instead I'm feeling very cynical and getting wolf in sheep's clothing vibes; I would like to be proved wrong.
A million could fix a lot of roof.Buzzed: Lambeth Council hits reset on estate ‘regeneration’ after a decade of delays and ignoring residents
"The Council is set to spend close to £1m to hire consultants to work out what to do next."