littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Snap!I’ve just bolded the bits that seem to me perhaps uniquely horrific about this particular genocide under discussion.
Snap!I’ve just bolded the bits that seem to me perhaps uniquely horrific about this particular genocide under discussion.
If you can find a book by a reputable historian which states that 3-4 million Romani were killed in the holocaust, do please go ahead and cite it.
Tbf sources I've looked at today give the total pre-Holocaust Romani population in Europe much lower than that figure. Somewhere between 1 and 2 million.Better still, why don't you cite a reputable historian since you clearly aren't one.
That's the sort of thing I used think too, but on reflection the Soviet response of casual, brutal, arbitrary indifference seems worse. Or does it? I can't decide.I’ve just bolded the bits that seem to me perhaps uniquely horrific about this particular genocide under discussion.
That's what I meant. Thanks for the correction.Haven't you answered your own question here? It was "organised, systematic, bureaucratic, semi-scientific, industrialised extermination". Not semi-scientific, though. Pseudo-scientific, based on total untruths. Important distinction.
Manhattan project no one knows their cog in the machine. Power structures can ensure this plays out. Cos no one would do it knowing their part would they.Yes. It was the concrete railings and barbed wire that got me, at Birkenau. They were so precisely placed and the fencing in general was so well engineered that I had just the same thought as you describe your mum having: someone planned all this, someone with a lot of civil engineering expertise sat down and worked out how best to design a death camp for killing people from my ethnocultural group, giving careful consideration to the bend of the railings and how best to secure the wires. It got me worse than the shoes.
Right guysManhattan project no one knows their cog in the machine. Power structures can ensure this plays out. Cos no one would do it knowing their part would they.
That's the sort of thing I used think too, but on reflection the Soviet response of casual, brutal, arbitrary indifference seems worse. Or does it? I can't decide.
This teacher, and others apparently, is complaining that kids seem really unempathetic about the Holocaust, that they joke about it, etc.
But I wonder whether this is not lack of empathy but simply that this is really old history to kids. People my age and older tend to assume that because there's film footage it's 'modern history' and will feel immediate, but I don't think it will necessarily feel that way to kids and the fact is it is quite old history now. Obviously it's still incredibly important but I'm not sure we can expect reverence or immediate empathy from most kids.
Think it’s that plus the speed of information these days makes even things from a few years ago feel much long ago. Right now for teenagers September 11 is history, and talked about the way we talk about the Romans etc…
I wonder how many of those ship manufacturers, deck hands and shackle producers claimed ignorance once slavery was abolished? How many of them were shocked when reflecting, swore 'never again', and used the remainders of their lives to warn, educate and talk about their active roles and complacency?On the matter of custom-made tools for genocide and the process being carried out on an industrial scale, I can't help thinking of the slave ships designed and built (or rebuilt) for that specific purpose, and manacles and shackles being mass-produced in European factories for the transporting of entire villages at a time.
But for me the really horrifying thing about mass murder and genocide isn't really the specific people it's done to, the method or the pretexts it's done with, or the ideology of the organisers. It's that in order to happen, normal everyday people have to join in; and, normal ordinary people DO join in. Deck hands, drivers, cooks, paper pushers, guards. Potentially our own neighbours and work colleagues if it happened again, happened here. I don't doubt it for a moment.
I think the real lesson of the holocaust - not numbers of victims but an idea: never again - if it was ever learned at all rather than just being parroted, is actually in danger of being forgotten in this world.
Erm, wrong thread..?I bought a bargain slate kitchen worktop on Amazon and some very reasonably priced and delicious steaks from Lidl
Have you learned from it?I bought a bargain slate kitchen worktop on Amazon and some very reasonably priced and delicious steaks from Lidl
I wonder how many of those ship manufacturers, deck hands and shackle producers claimed ignorance once slavery was abolished? How many of them were shocked when reflecting, swore 'never again', and used the remainders of their lives to warn, educate and talk about their active roles and complacency?
I see very little of the latter...esp not in my family. 'Didn't know' and 'the others were bigger players' provided for a clear consciousness, untill old age kicked in and the old slogans and songs re-surfaced.
Still, not many ever investigated what had happened to their old neighbours, much more profitable to take over flats, shops and workshops, for zero costs....getting away with it meant to keep schtumm and to not dig to deep.
How the next generation, the one after and the one after is supposed to progressively learn and feel empathy i don't know.
To listen to the victims and their horrific stories is one thing and very important, but the perpetrators still form a silent majority who don't want to be found out...
And yes, i do have friends whose grandparents were in the small minority who were swept away and were part of a horrific movement. Yet they learned and vowed to teach and educate.
Belonging to a peace movement and being active anti fascists was only a part of their ways to deal with their past.
They were also incredibly frank and honest.
But they were a minority.
'Never again' is nothing more than a slogan to make us feel better about ourselves and our past, in most cases anyway.
Yes, I agree and see thatI wonder how many of those ship manufacturers, deck hands and shackle producers claimed ignorance once slavery was abolished? How many of them were shocked when reflecting, swore 'never again', and used the remainders of their lives to warn, educate and talk about their active roles and complacency?
I see very little of the latter...esp not in my family. 'Didn't know' and 'the others were bigger players' provided for a clear consciousness, untill old age kicked in and the old slogans and songs re-surfaced.
Still, not many ever investigated what had happened to their old neighbours, much more profitable to take over flats, shops and workshops, for zero costs....getting away with it meant to keep schtumm and to not dig to deep.
How the next generation, the one after and the one after is supposed to progressively learn and feel empathy i don't know.
To listen to the victims and their horrific stories is one thing and very important, but the perpetrators still form a silent majority who don't want to be found out...
And yes, i do have friends whose grandparents were in the small minority who were swept away and were part of a horrific movement. Yet they learned and vowed to teach and educate.
Belonging to a peace movement and being active anti fascists was only a part of their ways to deal with their past.
They were also incredibly frank and honest.
But they were a minority.
'Never again' is nothing more than a slogan to make us feel better about ourselves and our past, in most cases anyway.
not wrong thread, Sue, but probably clumsily expressed.Erm, wrong thread..?
Erm, wrong thread..?
A genocide that is ongoing, according to indigenous activists. The racism is so baked into that society that it isn't even noticed. Nor has much of it been done indifferently, over the centuries.Not sure, but I think it is less of a unique feature. There was casual, brutal arbitrary indifference involved with the genocide of the North American First Nations.
Exactly this.If you take David Bowie’s first album and go just as far back again, you land before the start of the first world war.
When I was a kid my grandparents and other older folk would tell me about the World Wars and the Holocaust.
Understandable that the timescales feel very different to kids today.
Unless you didn't have a choice.Manhattan project no one knows their cog in the machine. Power structures can ensure this plays out. Cos no one would do it knowing their part would they.
For me, the difference between the Holocaust and, say, the Armenian genocide or the genocide that is happening right now in Gaza is intent.
The Armenian genocide and the Gaza genocide share certain characteristics. They are acts of ethnic cleansing. You people, leave now. Or die. We don't care which, and we don't care where you go as long as it's somewhere other than here. Casual, callous disregard for the lives of people you don't really deem fully human.
But the Holocaust was the logical conclusion of an ideology and set of beliefs that certain 'races', including Jews and Romani, are a blight on the planet and need to be exterminated. Not just 'we don't want you, go away' or 'we want your land, go away', but 'we think you are evil, you must die'.
For me, that's where the real horror lies, and I don't necessarily think it lacks any equivalents in history - Rwanda perhaps is a near equivalent: 'you are Tutsi, you must die' - but many other atrocities are definitely still genocide while lacking this particular intent. And then there was the measured, calculated way they went about it. A killing frenzy like that in Rwanda is in some important ways less horrifying than a calm, organised, bureaucratic extermination.
ETA: Just to add to this. I am aware that this is a Eurocentric view. Or more accurately a Eurocentric gut feeling. Someone from East Asia or Africa or South America may have very different gut feelings. And no reason why they shouldn't.
The mainstream media followed the lead of governments and international organisations, embracing the terminology created by the Milošević propaganda machinery. They reported about the war as if it was too complicated to explain to Western audiences and instead suggested that it was fuelled by “centuries-old hatreds” among people who do not want to live together, and that “ethnic cleansing” was the only solution.
This interpretation of what happened in Bosnia in the 1990s persists until today. It has become ingrained in the language of Western war reporters and their approach to reporting almost any war, as we can see in the coverage of the Gaza war.