Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

Are you are you not talking in terms of what 'the markets' will do?

The other poster who talked thusly has some credit - you, not a fucking penny.
brogdale was making out that the markets were forcing austerity, I was disagreeing.

At least I think that's what was happening, though it's tangental to my main point that we're in a very different position to Greece, Spain etc due to having our own currency and our own central bank.
 
It's not really interesting so much as a continuation of the previous red-baiting. Oh no Corbyn is against the EU (despite saying explicitly he is in favour of staying in) which means he's against stuff that middle-class 'left' liberal Guardistas like... like french cheese, cafés and posh wine and he probably likes racism or something as well as communism!

What a pity, Corbyn would probably get more support if he was opposed to the EU.
 
Can anyone recommend some reading on what it was that made social democracy a possibility in the post-WW2 era, and why it might no longer possible? I've heard the argument before but never really thought too deeply about it. Beyond the fact that millions of people with military training demanding a welfare state might be quite persuasive, of course.
 
Can anyone recommend some reading on what it was that made social democracy a possibility in the post-WW2 era, and why it might no longer possible? I've heard the argument before but never really thought too deeply about it. Beyond the fact that millions of people with military training demanding a welfare state might be quite persuasive, of course.

They lost the war.
 
Can anyone recommend some reading on what it was that made social democracy a possibility in the post-WW2 era, and why it might no longer possible? I've heard the argument before but never really thought too deeply about it. Beyond the fact that millions of people with military training demanding a welfare state might be quite persuasive, of course.
Posted before, but this is, in a sense, a condensed version of "Buying Time"
 
well I'm a bit lost then as to what this post meant.
Because we're discussing in a thread about the potential for an anti-austerity leader who given the (massively unlikely) power of office would have the chance to test that 'freedom'.
 
OK, so not we, then? It's funny how all states in the EU and beyond have 'voluntarily" decided on a course of fiscal consolidation to reduce the size of the state. You reckon that's 'free will', do you?
I think I'm going to give up on this conversation, I've no idea what point you've been making, and you started from a position of misunderstanding a point I'd made.
 
I think I'm going to give up on this conversation, I've no idea what point you've been making, and you started from a position of misunderstanding a point I'd made.
OK, I'll have another go, then.
I took objection to your claim that "We as in the UK government are doing austerity voluntarily..". My principle problem with that notion is the implication that the executives of 'sovereign' nation states are free to choose whether or not they comply with the demands of (global) financialised capital.

As in most European states, we happen to be governed by an administration that enthusiastically enacts the neo-liberal agenda of austerity and, politically, would want to convey the impression that such measures represent the 'sovereign' settled will of the people as expressed by the executive of their elected representatives.

I agree with you that in the case of Eurozone states there is a 'middle-man' that acts to impose the will of fincap upon the members of the currency union, and we have seen what happens to a state that toyed with the idea of not 'doing austerity'.

If Corbyn (or someone of that stripe) were to become PM of an administration committed to reverse the fiscal consolidation of 'austerity' they would face the hegemonic power of fincap to undermine the economy. The pressure would, obviously, not have to be sub-contracted to the ECB, but applied directly through "the markets" via, for example, unsustainably hiked bond yields.

It is for these reasons that I despair at the 'fetishisation' of the leadership of the 'left' party of financialised capital. If Corbyn won the leadership, if he then carried his party to a genuine anti-austerity platform, if they then won power...then we would be able to see just how "voluntary" austerity is.
 
Mann going for a different tactic this morning I see after trying the child abuse one last week. I can't even be bothered to link an article that's how interested I've become in Labour and the leadership battle.
 
can only tell after seeing the acceptance speech, just the same as telling who's the worst loser.
tbf, if we were really serious about such a judgement, the party would have to tell them all, (one by one), that they'd 'won'...and then compare their performances. I suppose they'd have to use a sound-proofed, box like they used to on 'Mr&Mrs' to ensure fair play and all that.
Could be quite entertaining....especially the reveal.
 
Mann going for a different tactic this morning I see after trying the child abuse one last week. I can't even be bothered to link an article that's how interested I've become in Labour and the leadership battle.
Mann used to work as a researcher for the right-wing AEEU under (Sir) Ken Jackson, who himself was an associate of Frank Chapple and Eric Hammond.
 
Corbyn is going for it, Kat Fletcher, ex NUS President/AWL is running the campaign, has hundreds of volunteers, the Manchester meeting saw over 300 people with two days notice, his twitter site, JEZYOUCAN, seem dominated by under 30's, they have raised well over 50, 000 pounds and a new call centre team is being set up, this is all on the sites, don't shoot the messenger.
 
Back
Top Bottom