how very democratick of themTalk of an instant vote by labour MPs to oust jezza should he end up as leader.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...abour-rivals-against-panic-over-jeremy-corbyn
maybe i've been swept along in corbyn-fever but i guess "When" would be "the next election"and "What would it look like" would be "the traditional socialist labour party renationalising, rebuilding the NHS and the welfare system, taxing the rich more... all those good things.When do they win with a message of hope?
What does this winning look like for me?
So it hasn't happened? This stuff from Corbyn is like some shitty tesco birthday card,.maybe i've been swept along in corbyn-fever but i guess "When" would be "the next election"and "What would it look like" would be "the traditional socialist labour party renationalising, rebuilding the NHS and the welfare system, taxing the rich more... all those good things.
Corbyn said that labour wins with hope or some nonsense - i asked when that had actually happened. And the answer seemed to be at some point in the future.what hasn't happened? the leadership election? no it hasn't happened yet so it is early days. what would you like to happen??
oops forgot to quote. butchersapron
maybe i've been swept along in corbyn-fever but i guess "When" would be "the next election"and "What would it look like" would be "the traditional socialist labour party renationalising, rebuilding the NHS and the welfare system, taxing the rich more... all those good things.
no he didn't say that. the person who wrote the article that i posted said it; it was a comment piece on his unexpectedly popular leadership campaign, not an interview.Corbyn said that labour wins with hope or some nonsense - i asked when that had actually happened. And the answer seemed to be at some point in the future.
the article kind of makes this point, but not from a negative perspective, more kind of saying "this could actually work and get votes".Seriously, that banality from him is as bad as any blairite guff soundbite - in fact, it's the same model isn't it?
Same thing - same people - same greeting card guff.no he didn't say that. the person who wrote the article that i posted said it; it was a comment piece on his unexpectedly popular leadership campaign, not an interview.
hmm you could just admit you got the wrong end of the stick and misquoted because you didn't read the link.Same thing - same people - same greeting card guff.
I have read the article - and it really is just cynical greeting card guff.hmm you could just admit you got the wrong end of the stick and misquoted because you didn't read the link.
ok i just thought you hadn't because you said that corbyn had said the quote about "hope winning the election", when in fact it was a direct quote from the article and he hasn't said anything of the kind as far as I know?I have read the article - and it really is just cynical greeting card guff.
andrew niel hammered him on 'talking to the ira two days after they'd tried to blow up the government'. His response that you don't make peace by ignoring the other side was valid but I can see that one being a millstone round his neck.
brighton hotelIs that in relation to the 1991 mortar attack on Downing street? Because the obvious response to that one is that the Tory government had been talking behind the scenes to the Provies from 1987 onwards.
brighton hotel
e2a
and he did mention that the gov. had been in talks with the ira behind the scenes anyway- mediated through priests wsn't it?
Corbyn actually made that point but was drowned out by Brilllo talking over him.Is that in relation to the 1991 mortar attack on Downing street? Because the obvious response to that one is that the Tory government had been talking behind the scenes to the Provies from 1987 onwards.
In his letter, Burnham admitted that he had led calls for the party to change its position, but sought to reassure Labour MPs that it was “only the beginning of a major fight with the Tories”.
“I am determined that we will fight this regressive bill line by line, word by word in committee,” he added.
BBC News reporting that Burnham, Cooper and Kendall, will back Harriet position on abstaining from tonights Welfare vote, though some(a few) LP MP will vote against
so, the LP is voting for a form of state eugenics, cuts in disability benefits, a cap down to 13,000 for a single person.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...m-not-vote-against-unsupportable-welfare-bill
Burnham really is a shape shifter, turner