Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour & Anti-Semitism.

(fwiw the polling from most of the polling companies show Labour as the largest party and - actually - on the brink of power)
 
Do you really think the only thing standing between Labour and the brink of power is their failure to deal with antisemitism among their membership & supporters?

It’s a big problem. That they have others, Brexit and an unpopular leader for starters, just adds to the concern that it won’t get a chance to adopt the policies is has that will help people at least a little.
 
Yes, only now, I think it is starting to have an impact, for much of the time it was something most people just didn't concern themselves, but it is now all over everyday TV, radio, and filters in to wider questions of fit to govern.
 
Yes, only now, I think it is starting to have an impact, for much of the time it was something most people just didn't concern themselves, but it is now all over everyday TV, radio, and filters in to wider questions of fit to govern.
so you think that because it's all over the media it is having an effect. in what way does this effect differ from all the other stories about corbyn and his fitness for political office which have been er all over the media for the past four years?

does it come up in conversation much with the people you meet in your everyday life?
 
Yes, only now, I think it is starting to have an impact, for much of the time it was something most people just didn't concern themselves, but it is now all over everyday TV, radio, and filters in to wider questions of fit to govern.
Is that to do with the specific content of the attacks, the grounds that they are taking place on - anti-semitism. Or is it just the relentless attacks? if the latter then this is always going to happen, there is no way around it. So to blame the people being attacked seems a bit daft. How can you try to move the labour party leftward without this happening? You can't.
 
so you think that because it's all over the media it is having an effect. in what way does this effect differ from all the other stories about corbyn and his fitness for political office which have been er all over the media for the past four years?

does it come up in conversation much with the people you meet in your everyday life?

You are adopting an odd position on this. It seems that we have agreement that Corbo’s followers include an unfortunate number of flakes who are quick to pick up on silly conspiracies and utilise antisemitism if JC is criticised. JC himself appears unable to fully grasp the scale of the problem and at the same point his overall approval ratings and the LP’s poll ratings are running low and yet no one should hazard a guess about how this may affect Labour’s chances?
 
You are adopting an odd position on this. It seems that we have agreement that Corbo’s followers include an unfortunate number of flakes who are quick to pick up on silly conspiracies and utilise antisemitism if JC is criticised. JC himself appears unable to fully grasp the scale of the problem and at the same point his overall approval ratings and the LP’s poll ratings are running low and yet no one should hazard a guess about how this may affect Labour’s chances?
perhaps you should reread my post to see what i'm actually saying
 
You think the specific content of the anti-semitism claims rather than the wider narrative of civil war and internal disorganisation is harming them electorally?

I think so, their ridiculous reaction to the Panarama documentary reeks of institutionalised racism imo. Whataboutary, addressing the motives of the accusers and broadcaster not the issues/accusations all points to this.

Antisemitism is having an impact.
 
I think so, their ridiculous reaction to the Panarama documentary reeks of institutionalised racism imo. Whataboutary, addressing the motives of the accusers and broadcaster not the issues/accusations all points to this.

Antisemitism is having an impact.
On the electorate? All them things you mention are effects on the membership, the corbyn supporting membership.
 
I've just watched the Panaroma programme.

It's left me in no doubt that there is anti semitism in the Labour Party that has increased hugely since Corbyn has been at the helm. I don't think the leadership have done no where near enough to root it out either.

Shameful.
 
As has been noted, Ed was well ahead and had a considerably higher poll share. These leads don’t point to progress, simply that it’s all a bit febrile.
He wasn't ahead in this situation. If you're doing real like polls do you want to put his actually existing electoral record up against corbyn's?
 
On the electorate? All them things you mention are effects on the membership, the corbyn supporting membership.

I think so, I'm the electorate - not a member of the party. I won't vote for them now as they are to me a racist party - same as the Tories, Brexit Party , UKIP etc.
 
Is that to do with the specific content of the attacks, the grounds that they are taking place on - anti-semitism. Or is it just the relentless attacks? if the latter then this is always going to happen, there is no way around it. So to blame the people being attacked seems a bit daft. How can you try to move the labour party leftward without this happening? You can't.

There possibly is something about the specific content of the attacks that makes them particularly effective and one might say inflammatory when used against Labour's members and supporters, insofar as they are basically accusations of racism, made against a group that proudly identifies as anti-racist.

I can't imagine the Tories for example, giving much of a shit about being called racists.
 
There possibly is something about the specific content of the attacks that makes them particularly effective and one might say inflammatory when used against Labour's members and supporters, insofar as they are basically accusations of racism, made against a group that proudly identifies as anti-racist.

I can't imagine the Tories for example, giving much of a shit about being called racists.
Well if, as you suggest, labour puts an especial value on being anti-racist it could probably have done a bit better on this. And a bit sooner. Lots of people saw this happening as soon as corbyn won the election. It's not like they weren't warned.
 
There possibly is something about the specific content of the attacks that makes them particularly effective and one might say inflammatory when used against Labour's members and supporters, insofar as they are basically accusations of racism, made against a group that proudly identifies as anti-racist.
.

Time they took a long hard look at themselves then. Until thye recognise it they can't deal with it.
 
Suspect that the biggest impact of the anti-semitism row is on thoroughly demoralising Labour Party members like me who back the policy direction of Corbynism, are despairing at the cranks in the party and utterly maddened by the inability of the leadership to actually do any leading. I've gradually gone from supporting Corbyn, to thinking he's not ideal but it's about the policies not the man, to worrying that he's now outstaying his welcome and he personally is starting to be a threat to the survival of the policy programme.
 
Sure. No doubt at all they made a complete hash of dealing with the genuine antisemitism present in their ranks, but now their chances of addressing it are severely hampered by a sort of siege mentality that almost inevitably arises from being dog-piled by all and sundry on the issue.

Clearly many on Labour's left perceive that there is sponsorship or exploitation of the actual attacks along these lines by different groups who are hostile to left politics; whether in support of the Israeli government, or from power struggles with the Labour right, or just from capital doing what it does e.g. via the corporate media.

The lack of any real analytical framework for attribution of such exploitation / sponsorship though, appears to cause any attempt to discuss that wider context to tend to devolve quickly into a binary choice between e.g. "Mossad disinformation op" vs "Antisemitic conspiraloonery"

Hence the stuff from the professional cybersecurity world I was posting a page or two back, where I think there might be some of the tools for a pragmatic analysis of the apparent exploitation and/or sponsorship of this attack line by various groups.

I think that being able to have a sensible conversation about that stuff (or at least not having to pretend that it isn't happening for fear of being called an "antisemitic conspiraloon") is likely to be a critical success factor for dealing with actual anti-semitism.

If they leave a gap there, it will almost certainly get filled by exactly the sort of gibberish that would exacerbate the problem.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom