I think this is what's baffled me about Mclusky's article in the Statesman - why now? The conversation has moved on.weeks late.
I think this is what's baffled me about Mclusky's article in the Statesman - why now? The conversation has moved on.weeks late.
This is just how slow ponderous beasts on 150 grand a year shouting about "reactionary elements" like it's the 30s roll.I think this is what's baffled me about Mclusky's article in the Statesman - why now? The conversation has moved on.
Best leave it to local Labour activists to resolve.What steps are you taking towards this end - as the second in command of the anarchist labour party police?
Oh right? The one's where holocaust denial is fine? I thought that you anarchists for labour would have stamped that out. Or is your oddessy only beginningBest leave it to local Labour activists to resolve.
I think this is what's baffled me about Mclusky's article in the Statesman - why now? The conversation has moved on.
Given in a few weeks he'd be able to trumpet a Labour success in the locals and how the MPs he doesn't like are on the wrong side of the argument - it seems shit timing.
I think this is what's baffled me about Mclusky's article in the Statesman - why now? The conversation has moved on.
So does anyone here consider him guilty as charged or is it a stitch-up as some people on Twitter are speculating. Genuinely interested here btw as I'm not going to pretend to know the right or wrong of this.
It wasn't anti-Semitism but bringing the party into disrepute.
It's being very heavily (if maybe deniably) headlined as being for anti-semitism though. e.g. Labour activist Marc Wadsworth expelled from party over antisemitism rowIt wasn't anti-Semitism but bringing the party into disrepute.
His own defence was that he didn't realise that Ruth Smeeth was Jewish. So he himself places it within the anti-semitism thing.It's being very heavily (if maybe deniably) headlined as being for anti-semitism though. e.g. Labour activist Marc Wadsworth expelled from party over antisemitism row
Smeeth claimed it was anti-semitic, and the cabal of right-wing MP's supported her. It really is one of the daftest cases, he slagged her off (at the launch of the Chakrabarti report) for 'working hand in hand' with the Telegraph. Which is far enough really. Another one of those 'not the most tactful thing in the world to do, but not anti-semitic' eventsHis own defence was that he didn't realise that Ruth Smeeth was Jewish. So he himself places it within the anti-semitism thing.
Oh i know what happened - or at least what was filmed and posted on here at the time. I was making clear that he too saw his actions and defended himself within the rubric of anti-semitism in the labour party. The idea that certain actions are ok if you are unaware that someone is jewish is more than reprehensible. It's racist.Smeeth claimed it was anti-semitic, and the cabal of right-wing MP's supported her. It really is one of the daftest cases, he slagged her off (at the launch of the Chakrabarti report) for 'working hand in hand' with the Telegraph. Which is far enough really. Another one of those 'not the most tactful thing in the world to do, but not anti-semitic' events
It’s largely guilt by association, shared platforms and the like...then not dumping Ken when he stupidly courted the limelight rather than engaging his brain, then being seen to do too little. It’s a nightmare, if you think you can comment on the Middle East/Israel/Zionism/jewdism in the character limit on Twitter, perhaps you shouldn’t be in politics. It stinks. He may not be the cause of the smell bit he’s been tainted.So does anyone here consider him guilty as charged or is it a stitch-up as some people on Twitter are speculating. Genuinely interested here btw as I'm not going to pretend to know the right or wrong of this.
Smeeth claimed it was anti-semitic, and the cabal of right-wing MP's supported her. It really is one of the daftest cases, he slagged her off (at the launch of the Chakrabarti report) for 'working hand in hand' with the Telegraph. Which is far enough really. Another one of those 'not the most tactful thing in the world to do, but not anti-semitic' events
Can anyone clarify exactly what Mr Wadsworth said or did that led to his expulsion?
Thank you.
The idea that certain actions are ok if you are unaware that someone is jewish is more than reprehensible. It's racist.
Of course not. What's that got to do with this idiots actions though?Is it racist to say that right wing labour MP's are working hand in hand with right wing journalists ?
I thought that was basis of accusation against MW , that he said RS was working hand in hand with Telegraph journalist.Of course not. What's that got to do with this idiots actions though?
Shall i take this as agreement or dissent on the idea that i wouldn't say it openly if i knew they were jewish is racist then btw?Is it racist to say that right wing labour MP's are working hand in hand with right wing journalists ?
David Rosenburg stood in his defense... His account of what happened: