butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The heart of society, same as the rioters.
The sole absence of the context doesn't infer that one IS alluding to one, only that one might be.
Now I'm convinced you don't know what 'allude' means.
How about 'fuck off you tiresome brainless moron'.Do you know what 'infer' means?
talk about a default setting...How about 'fuck off you tiresome brainless moron'.
Know what that means?
God, give this guy a brain!Did you google 'infer' before posting that? Either that or you thought for 6 minutes about what your reply was going to be.
Right, and people don't tend to react to some raw platonic-esque conception of theft of trainers, in a 'thieving scumbag' kind of way, do they?
ah yes your usual trick when you're stumped for a proper answer - sneer at the other persons alleged lack of intelligence.
you keep doing that, and it's pathetic
How do you know anything about what people tend to do?How would you or I know how they might conceive it?
How do you know anything about what people tend to do?
I don't agree, I think it's cute.
How do you know anything about what people tend to do?
Maybe you could infer something about it?
What tendencies may be specific to context, then?I can't. I can suppose, I can assume, I can extrapolate from prior knowledge, but actually knowing is usually a hindsight thing, where your suppositions, extrapolations and assumptions are, to a greater or lesser degree, confirmed.
Human relations aren't like physics, there are no "laws" of behaviour that extend beyond "extremely general but not universally applicable". Even tendencies may be specific to context.
Tendencies toward certain types of behaviour have been shown to be context-specific, i.e. the behaviour only emerges with certain situations. Milgram showed that tendencies to obedience behaviour that didn't emerge in some contexts emerged under others.What tendencies may be specific to context, then?
faux pas , can you just say what your point is please ?
As you exemplified your point with Milgrim: Just because Milgrim showed that 'tendencies to obedience behaviour emerged in some contexts', how does it follow that certain types of behaviour only emerge with certain situations'?
Is it a bit like your tendency not be able to see your own abusive nature?
translation: I have been completely ripped apart so I'm getting out of here. Again.fuck it
translation: got better things to do then fend off cliquey-leftiststranslation: I have been completely ripped apart so I'm getting out of here. Again.
Please ?
translation: waaaahhh, mummy, those nasty boys are calling me names againtranslation: got better things to do then fend off cliquey-leftists
translation: got better things to do then fend off cliquey-leftists
translation: I'm an abusive left-leaning twonk who needs to fight my battles on-line on a forum that heavily favours me.translation: waaaahhh, mummy, those nasty boys are calling me names again
translation: I'm an abusive left-leaning twonk who needs to fight my battles on-line on a forum that heavily favours me.
See you all when you grow up and join the real world!