Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Can't find the link now, but I'm sure I read somewhere yesterday that applications for pension credits have doubled since the winter fuel announcement.

It would be ironic if the new policy ended up costing more, on a net basis, than if they'd left it alone.

I think if the people who are eligible for pension credits but don't currently claim do claim it, do claim it?
The "savings" from cutting WFA will be wiped out. But maybe that's the point. Get rid of WFA, get people
shifted onto Pension credits and then ignore those who fall through the cracks.

Though that would require genius level thinking and balls of steel to pull off. Neither of which I think
the Labour cabinet has.
 
The argument is that elected councils should have tax-raising powers so that they can be held accountable to the voters for their performance.
An argument that seems more theoretical than realistic. Councils are answerable through the ballot box regardless of local tax-raising. And they would still be responding for spending their budget.
If all local council funding came from central government, that would mean a centralisation of power and accountability.
In theory, maybe. But it could be mitigated by legally protecting the allocation of budget from central to local government.
 
An argument that seems more theoretical than realistic. Councils are answerable through the ballot box regardless of local tax-raising. And they would still be responding for spending their budget.

In theory, maybe. But it could be mitigated by legally protecting the allocation of budget from central to local government.
Ah yes. A constitution. We don't really have one of those. Hence Thatcher could rate-cap, scrap the GLC, etc.
 
Watch the cult onetruepath Labourites try and dress that up as something progressive. We are also waiting for Liz Kendall's plans.
So far, she's said she wants the DWP to move from “a department for welfare” to becoming “a genuine department for work”.
Presumably this stuff's only bad when Tories do it; Labour need to do it because of the Tories.
 
What with the Gen Z Narrative that the old people robbed them of their freedom just to save their wrinkly arses during Covid, coupled with enough wrinklies dying off in ensuing winters it could be a net vote winning strategy come next election
 
they will fuck off a lot of people with that. a great number of them pensioners. perhaps shammer is relying on putting a lot of auld people into the grave before the next election.

Including me! I would be around £580 a year worse off, based on this year's council tax bill. Next year's bill is bound to be a fair bit higher.

With the loss of the WFA, nearly £900 a year worse off.
 
The issue of council tax adjustments is clearly more complicated than just considerations about individuals. If 50% is appropriate for single occupancy, does that mean that empty properties should have 0%? Few would think that is appropriate, because we don’t like the idea of empty houses. But if you want to boil it down to simplistic statements about cost per person, it would make sense. What about when children grow up and stay living with their parents — do we increase council tax to allow for that? Isn’t that just the poll tax? That was unpopular too. Then, there is generally a fixed number of properties in an area. If they all turned from dual to single occupancy, would we be okay with the local council only having half their previous income?

I think the problem here really lies with the regressive nature of the council tax in the first place. Like I said before, I wouldn’t start from here.
It absolutely should not be 50pct. If we just look at council tax in isolation 75pct seems about right to me. 1 person living along is obviously going to use less resource than 2 but more than half so splitting the difference at 75pct seems fair enough.

Anyway as far as I'm aware this isn't even something they have suggested they just said it had not be rulled out.
 
Last edited:
Some of us owe Starmer an apology. I for one have been predicting that Starmer and his government would be a disaster and deeply unpopular within months of taking office.

I was wrong. He’s achieved mass unpopularity within weeks.

The only questions now are:

When does he beat the Tory record?
How long before the PLP realise Starmer and Reeves are an unmitigated disaster, have no plan and that defeating austerity through austerity has been tried before and merely leads to deeper austerity?

IMG_2143.jpeg
 
What the fuck is going on here?


to elaborate on my consternation, this was published a couple of days ago:


So the probable scale of the corruption is very high indeed so how does Labour expect the appointed corruption buster to succeed with not enough staff and what appears to be a part-time role? I am surmising here that they don't expect them to succeed and that this is deliberate.
 
Last edited:
Leaving aside the failure to declare the ‘gifts’ why did Starmer and his wife accept money for a “personal shopper, clothes and alterations” from a Billionaire in the first place?

 
McSweeney later told a friend that he saw this as Corbyn’s “Icarus moment”, in which he imagined the Labour leader standing backstage at Glastonbury with a choice: take that election result and turn to the country to cement the deal; or walk into the warm embrace of festivalgoers, who (McSweeney believed) were unrepresentative of the wider electorate. To him, Corbyn had just flown too close to the sun

 
So the probable scale of the corruption is very high indeed so how does Labour expect the appointed corruption buster to succeed with not enough staff and what appears to be a part-time role? I am surmising here that they don't expect them to succeed and that this is deliberate.

If I was Wes Streeting I'd probably not want too many people talking about corruption in healthcare. The man's so bent he can probably see up his own arsehole.
 

Its actually the sentence just before the one you've quoted which I think is more telling...
Sitting on that park bench, McSweeney was among those who took the 2017 result very seriously and believed that Corbyn, whose politics he despised, could win the next election. Counterintuitively, he found the Glastonbury scene reassuring.
 
it didn't need the leak or the subsequent ford report to know there was a lot of shithousing by the dickhead right. Still nice to hear the shit confirmed once again. Time was nobody centre or centre left wanted to hear it, now its time to revisit the crime scene to flog another 'aren't you glad we all stopped corbyn so we could do more austerity?' book by some cash in cunt
 
Lammy defends Starmer saying there is no budget for clothes. Just what the fuck?



Leaving aside the failure to declare the ‘gifts’ why did Starmer and his wife accept money for a “personal shopper, clothes and alterations” from a Billionaire in the first place?

 
Yes. Evidently this seems to have not occurred to him or he's blatantly taking the piss.
Politicians like to think they perform public service and this topic often features in their valedictory speeches

Actual public servants, the ones who do the work as opposed to those who go to meetings about other people doing the work, would likely lose their job for this sort of thing.
 
They say the first 100 days of a government sets the tone for its entire period of office. Starmer only took 70!

Next step is to beat Truss and Sunak’s record of being below 30 and going lower. You can do it Sir Keir!!

 
Back
Top Bottom