Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

I still have privacy concerns particularly with regards facial recognition, but I see it as an inevitability. Once the ID to vote thing kicks in it provides another rationale to do it
No, it doesn't. The argument may indeed be put forwards but it's not founded on the logical basis rationales are, rather it is a point at which Tory voter suppression interests meet commercial interests
 
No, it doesn't. The argument may indeed be put forwards but it's not founded on the logical basis rationales are, rather it is a point at which Tory voter suppression interests meet commercial interests
So let me understand - you are making a pedantic point about the correct definition of the word "rationale"?
😴
 
Funnily enough one thing that is good about the EU is it’s biometric ID cards

What's good about them? In much of Europe you're required to have ID at all times and can be compelled to produce it for no fucking reason at all. The fact this has never caught on in the UK is one of the few things that are better here than in the EU.

Blair failed with this idea before and now he wants another crack at it. Because he's a mad cunt.

E2a: Even if ID cards were a good idea, if either labour or the tories were implementing them it'd be a bottomless pit of cash for every spiv IT consultant from here to Hong Kong and it still wouldn't work. But they'd pretend it did work and make it mandatory for everything, causing untold grief and misery.
 
Last edited:
2016 wants its argument back. ;)

A lot of people say stuff like that. Close down or avoid the glaring issue by whinging on about ‘let’s not re-run the leave debate’, a handy line for some, but not a solution to the issue that existed in the run up to the vote, during the vote, and remains an issue since the vote, as events in the last week in Northern Ireland have shown.
Leave won the vote, but then avoids the consequences, and digs out others who highlight the consequences of leave.
 
What's good about them? In much of Europe you're required to have ID at all times and can be compelled to produce it for no fucking reason at all. The fact this has never caught on in the UK is one of the few things that are better here than in the EU.

Blair failed with this idea before and now he wants another crack at it. Because he's a mad cunt.

E2a: Even if ID cards were a good idea if either labour or the tories were implementing them it'd be a bottomless pit of cash for every spiv IT consultant from here to Hong Kong and it still wouldn't work. But they'd pretend it did work and make it mandatory for everything, causing untold grief and misery.
I think you partially answered the 'what's good about them ' in your first sentence. Over here the ID card is for voting, health/hospital visits/, contact with govt departments
travel within EU , and any other stuff where you have to show entitlement or identity. I'm still waiting for mine ( the border control service is being reorganised ) so have to carry three separate pieces of paper.

Agree with your last para though.
 
I think you partially answered the 'what's good about them ' in your first sentence. Over here the ID card is for voting, health/hospital visits/, contact with govt departments
travel within EU , and any other stuff where you have to show entitlement or identity. I'm still waiting for mine ( the border control service is being reorganised ) so have to carry three separate pieces of paper.

For this to make sense you'd have to first establish that, for example, having photo ID for voting was necessary. We've never had it before, and electoral fraud (by actual voters at least) has been so rare as to be an irrelevance.

In Europe ID cards are needed for everything because they're mandatory. They're not mandatory because they're needed for everything. They invented the thing first, and then the reason for inventing it.

In the UK, the reason was supposedly terrorism. Before that it was 'challenge 21' and the massive entrapment operation that went with it. Now it's voter ID, yet another problem that the state could more easily fix by simply not making it a problem in the first place.
 
Seems a bit daft security-wise to have your entire legal identity encoded onto a single card that could get lost or stolen. OK, maybe they could techify it by having the "ID Card" be an app on your smartphone. Which would be even worse from a security standpoint, because the identity thief need not even be in the same part of the country now that it's stored on an internet-connected device.
 
What happens in the EU?
Depends on the country I'd imagine. In France though (to take one example) it's been used repeatedly to go after anyone showing "visible signs of foreignness" (this is an actual legal term) as part of anti-migrant crackdowns. Not showing ID at a protest is also grounds for being taken into custody, unlike in Britain where you can only be made to give your name if you're suspected of an offence.
 
His team are already planning on losing the next election and making plans to replace him. He has done his job. he has hounded the left out. Now it is time for him to go and be replaced by a hardline Blairite.

 
i left the cubs because they wouldn't give me my skipping badge :mad: and Google images doesn't seem to do that sort of thing
 
Back
Top Bottom