DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
good I hope she felt like a twat
V. good tactic, more powerful than outright bans as a tactic for no platforming I think.
Here you go...Looking forward to some retarded spiked online article about how the students were trying to 'shut down debate' or some bollocks.
Cunts and arseholes.Who the fuck is in charge of the invites to these Oxford debates?
i think its more about getting in gobshites with extreme opinions in the hope of getting a debate going...classic shock joke phone in territory...universities should do better reallypeople whi invite shit like hopkins to debates are destestable fucks. Like holocaust deniers argueing about denial of nfreedom of speech, they live in the shadows, unable to say what they truly beleive, masking it under irony or whatevs. lolz.
Here you go...
But this method also runs rife on social media, which has been furthermore used by youths to pressure others towards - or away from - certain political views or ideologies.
The author of that article used to work for the Daily Heil. Says it all, really.This doesn't even make sense, they didn't prevent her from speaking they just powerfully demonstrated their contempt for this vile woman. In reality of course Katie Hopkins has greater speech rights than 99.9% of the population, if any of us wrote the sort of racist shit she peddles to millions through the Murdoch press then we would run the very real risk of criminal charges.
The students were very restrained and dignified, much more so than I would have been. I don't think I could have simply walked past her without shouting abuse or throwing something.
Looking forward to some retarded spiked online article about how the students were trying to 'shut down debate' or some bollocks.