Come on. It's meant as a light hearted article and you've have to be ridiculously uptight to view it as some sort of malicious piss take.
You're seriously putting these articles on a par with something that Jonathon Bishop comes up with?
If l ban him off Brixton Buzz will everyone be happy then?
I definitely felt like it scoffed at the club and its association with Altona.
And tbh I think lines like this:
Rio Ferdinand made a multimillion-pound offer to save the club back in 2018 and didn’t receive so much as a free scarf.
Even if not written with malice are so ill-informed as to be damaging to the club. It makes us sound ungrateful and incompetent. That's not even the worst example I could have picked.
He certainly mocks Hayrettin as well, completely unnecessarily:
Apart from a handful of familiar faces, it was a surprise any of these players managed to find their way back to the changing rooms at the full-time whistle.
Presumably this is all part of Hakan Hayrettin’s masterplan to become a “Dulwich Hamlet legend”, as he declared last month...
...Hayrettin, with one relegation under his belt already, knows he will need to get his players slaying the Stymphalian birds – or at least winning the occasional match – before his bronze statue is confirmed.
As I said in an earlier post, it felt like it was written for 'lols' and to make the writer look really fucking clever and witty, when actually all he was serving up was heavily distorted versions of the truth or just plain fabrications (did he find out how we treated Rio after he made a bid to buy the club? Maybe he did get a free scarf? Why hasn't he mentioned that HH had 13 games to save a squad that was sub-standard and full of toxic personalities? In a time in football when we're awash with mercenaries and overly financed leagues/clubs, what about HH saying he wants to become a DHFC 'legend' is so worthy of derision?)
I don't think anyone wants him banned per se - I just think people are confused and upset as to why someone who has written derisory, or at very best extremely lazy, articles about the club is being given a platform to spout this stuff, especially on a site that has done so much to help build DHFC to what it is today, and especially when the criticism/mocking/whatever you want to call it, is so bloody ill-informed? 'Banned' feels unnecessary - I just don't see why he deserves more chances to air his views when what's he's written thus far is so patently flawed, imbalanced, and frankly snide.
