Welcome to silly season in the seventh division – Dulwich Hamlet guest column #3
Also, what the fuck is the cartoon...?
Also, what the fuck is the cartoon...?
At least, they invited one team. Hamburg-based Altona 93 and their supporters arrived last week for their annual game against the Hamlet in an age-old tradition stretching back to 2015.
With nothing in common except that they were both founded in 1893, it’s a strange match-up on the surface. It can also cause confusion at half time when one fan turns to you and declares his intention to eat a Hamburger.
We get the piss taken out of us because we try to do things differently, the culture of English football is a right wing cesspit and the commentariat is riven with dinosaurs. I wont have some hack (supposed fan) operating under a pseudonym taking ill informed pot shots at the hard work of the club, volunteers and individual fans. The club has shortcomings and these are fair game none of these are covered by this piece.
The comment about Altona alone should have been enough to merit an editor worth their salt to send the piece back to the author with enough red ink to paint a house. The cartoon which effectively expunges our predominantly black working class player base is more sinister. What other progressive aspects of our club culture supposed to blithely accept as a target for gags...?
That's not how guest columns work.The comment about Altona alone should have been enough to merit an editor worth their salt to send the piece back to the author with enough red ink to paint a house.
You are literally talking bollocks but feel free to elaborate how I am 'more responsible' for his opinions.You are literally more responsible for the content and sentiment of the piece than the author.
Come on you can do better than this. But what would you like? The author banned?
I'd like to know what merits the publication of a piece so marred with inaccuracies? Unless the desire is to mock the club?
That's it from me, I just think that publications need to be responsible for their content.
I shall certainly be forwarding the comments to him, and your feedback on Buzz really helps.We play Altona every season do we? Could have sworn this was only the second time ever at home. Ho hum.
What is the drivel about trialists about? This is literally what every non-league team will be doing right now, as well as many league teams. All the other dross about them is utterly patronising. At best the cartoon is just weird, and just don't get it. However, I fear what Latahs says is more accurate.
Rio Ferdinand made an offer to the hedge fund/property developer owners to buy the ground, not to buy the club. They turned it down as they thought they could get more for the ground once planning was approved. We are still waiting to see if they will.
Finally, silly season is April/May when some teams have to play 3-4 times a week to clear backlogs of fixtures and has nothing to do with pre-season.
If these articles are going to continue, then can editor please ensure the author does more research and are less patronising. Alternatively, just send them back... There's plenty to champion at the club. How about something on the women's team or features on new players in the men's squad.
If your intention in publishing it was to send up the author and his ilk then that’s actually brilliant, am very into that.So you prefer straightforward censorship to education and dialogue?
Thing is, I imagine his opinions are quite representative of what a lot of new fans think. Most have no idea of the connection between Hamlet and Altona and the hugely disappointing turnout for the Clunis testimonial seems to echo the disconnect between 'our' Hamlet and how new fans view the club.
But you are hereby invited to submit an article raising your criticisms of the guest column which will, of course, be completely uncensored. Here's your chance to address the mistakes and hopefully make him a better writer. Are you up for that?
And just to put a bit of perspective into this: since 2012 Buzz has published many, many hundreds of articles about Hamlet, almost all of them positive. And before that, there was many articles on the urban75 blog dating back to 2008.
Happy to do so. I know you don't get it, but articles like his can actually help the club in the long run. Already it's highlighted the almighty disconnect between new fans and the values and history of the club.I'll happily write you an article, if you promise to tag it to the top of every future piece covering DHFC by this guy like BBC fact check. We all know that the glib misinformation travels further and faster than the truth so we have to cut it off and challenge it dont we?
Editor, you've done so much to help the club over the years, this was a real let down.
This. I would genuinely like to understand what he was trying to do.I'm sorry, I don't mean to be harsh, but I don't know how that was ever published. Surely there's got to be some degree of quality control?
It's not remotely clear what this is supposed to be - is it supposed to be funny? An outsider's view? An insider's view? Is the author trying to say that non-league is shit? It's a completely incoherent mess from someone who's trying to pretend to know what they're talking about but very obviously doesn't. .