Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
so much of it emerged from his own party, which you might imagine desired to win an election.
Jeremy Corbyn's time is up
- Thread starter hash tag
- Start date
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Indeed. Fighting like ferrets in a sack doesn't endear any party to the electorate.
Shechemite
Be the sun and all will see you
Maybe he and his politics just weren’t that popular?
Shechemite
Be the sun and all will see you
Tbf neither were the Stop Brexit/people’s vote weirdos. Hell in a handcart
SpookyFrank
A cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel
Lucky the tories are such paragons of unity eh?
Yes you have.
Becuase they are irrelevant.
Trump is virtually identical to Clinton.
True, but that is the reality of reformism.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Use the quote function like everyone else. But I don't believe it says I am a component of the anarchist movement. Which the is what you claimed, something like a self-described component of the @ movement
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Clinton is a shit. But she is not a fascist or radical rightist
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
no, they aren't. Or rather if they are you're saying my opinion is irrelevant. And if that's the case I don't know why you're bothering coming back to this after leaving it for some days.
You wrote (my emphasis): “in the anarchist movement we welcome diverse viewpoints.”
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I know what it says. But you said I described myself as a component. I don't.
If Trump is a fascist/far-right, then so is Clinton.
Their politics are virtually identical.
Your use of the word “we” means just that. You were describing yourself as being part of — a component of — the “anarchist movement”.
Deny it all you like.
But it’s there in back and white.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you didn't say I described myself as an anarchist.
You said I described myself as a component of the @ movement. I have never described myself as a component of the @ movement. It is not a phrase I have ever used.
andysays
Love and solidarity
Not only is this complete and utter bollocks, it's a fucking insult to all those unjustly imprisoned and actually executed by numerous states around the world.
Earlier in the thread I commented that credibility was important and that you hadn't yet earned it here. With this garbage you've completely destroyed any chance you might have had to actually earn any credibility.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
are they?
Shechemite
Be the sun and all will see you
No
Clinton at least gave the impression that he gave a shit. Wouldn't trust him all the same.
Still, there's no "if" about Trump's fascism.
Oh, right. Hilary. Same sentiment. Anyways, she lost. Get over it.
From a Lancet letter signed by more than 60 clinicians:
we have real concerns, on the evidence currently available, that Mr Assange could die in prison. The medical situation is thereby urgent. There is no time to lose. ... Should Assange die in a UK prison, as the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has warned, he will effectively have been tortured to death.
Might be “utter bollocks” to you, but that’s only because you’re a vulgar apologist for the US empire and British state oppression.
I don’t have to “earn” anything from you.
Yes.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Do tell me more
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
On second thoughts Alex106 don't
At least not until you've compared eg the Wikipedia articles on the political positions of djt and hrc.
But being as you're quite happy to invent how people describe themselves I have no great confidence in your ability to identify differences and commonalities between the duo. So much easier just to say they think the same. Pisspoor.
At least not until you've compared eg the Wikipedia articles on the political positions of djt and hrc.
But being as you're quite happy to invent how people describe themselves I have no great confidence in your ability to identify differences and commonalities between the duo. So much easier just to say they think the same. Pisspoor.
Last edited:
Hilary - “I'm very proud that I was a Goldwater Girl” - Clinton.
“Super-predators”.
And so on.
Virtually identical to Trump.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yeh Abby Martin is a really reliable source
9/11 truther and Russia today, a top backstory of honesty there - no wonder you're an uncritical assange fanboy. You've the critical faculties of a lobotomized slug.
Rich coming from a Clintonite.
Everything Martin said in that clip is backed by plenty of evidence.
agricola
a genuine importer of owls
It is an understandable mistake, but when talking about Trump "Goldwater Girl" has an entirely different and much messier meaning.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
this would be the Clinton I've described above as a shit. Perhaps you call people you support shits. I don't.
Let's see you detail this evidence.
Plenty of evidence is detailed in the video.
If there’s any point you think Martin is wrong on in that clip let me know.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I've asked you to tell me more. You hide behind a video whose quality I frankly doubt. I asked you to detail this supporting evidence you mentioned in 28015. You evade the question. I've pointed you to information detailing the differences in their politics but you'd rather use a video of dubious quality from a former Putin propagandist than present any reputable sources to sustain your position. You are a worthy successor to the touts nally and sheridan
Similar threads
