redsquirrel
This Machine Kills Progressives
68% of pre-2015 GE members back himSo after all the stuff of the last year we have a Labour Party where 40% of members/supporters actually back Owen Smith and think he should be leader.
68% of pre-2015 GE members back himSo after all the stuff of the last year we have a Labour Party where 40% of members/supporters actually back Owen Smith and think he should be leader.
That's interesting, as is Corbyn's massive lead amongst the EU leavers (with the usual qualifications about sample size). I suspect his opponents will find a way of using both of those findings against him. To be honest, they haven't got much else.68% of pre-2015 GE members back him
68% of pre-2015 GE members back him
Um I'm no psephologist so I'm not too sure what you're talking about here, I just found it mildly surprising (if true) that the stats produced that result. He's been touted I seem to recall as appealing more to younger voters.Meaningless, I'd be shocked if the errors on those cross-breaks aren't larger than the 2% difference
Whilst this may be true (I have no real idea who he is or what he stands for) he doesn't appear to be spinning the stats, just reporting them. Unless of course he's taken them completely out of context.George Eaton is a cherry-picking, dishonest cunt.
The errors on the values will be greater than the 2% difference between 40-59 and 18-23 year-olds, so Easton's conclusion is nonsense. Statistically those number are the same.Um I'm no psephologist so I'm not too sure what you're talking about here, I just found it mildly surprising (if true) that the stats produced that result. He's been touted I seem to recall as appealing more to younger voters.
Sorry not quite clear what you are asking, what % of the total membership are pre-2015 or what % of the total membership are pre-2015 and OS backers?what % of total membership is that?
The new polling is upsetting a lot of horrible people.
Sorry not quite clear what you are asking, what % of the total membership are pre-2015 or what % of the total membership are pre-2015 and OS backers?
Going by the numbers YouGov used the pre-2015 members count for ~48% of members, so 33% of members were members before May 2015 and back OS.
EDIT No idea if those YouGov breaks are correct though.
Also despite his revolting sexism Corbyn is doing better with women than men.
links please.
Sorry not quite clear what you are asking, what % of the total membership are pre-2015 or what % of the total membership are pre-2015 and OS backers?
Going by the numbers YouGov used the pre-2015 members count for ~48% of members, so 33% of members were members before May 2015 and back OS.
Yes that's true, as I said I'm just using YouGov's numbersI don't think that's quite right is it - 33% of the members entitled to vote are were members before May 2015 and back OS. It'll be lower for total members though as the recent joiners are excluded from that figure.
because appealing to the 52% of the electorate who voted leave makes him the unelectable one?That's interesting, as is Corbyn's massive lead amongst the EU leavers (with the usual qualifications about sample size). I suspect his opponents will find a way of using both of those findings against him. To be honest, they haven't got much else.
I know, but that's different to objecting to the fact that he now has strong personal support from those who voted leave. That's 52% of the electorate, so it's be pretty hard for anyone to win an election without having some level of appeal to that portion of the electorate.its already been said that he didn't campaign hard enough for remain. I thought his speech, against his own personal convictions on the matter, was fair enough. What did tey want, a battlebus tour or some shit
These figures showing his support among leave voters would seem to vindicate that approach to me, hopefully they can be replicated to some degree among UKIP supporters.
you are mixing up labour members/supporters who voted leave with the part of the general population that voted leave.he now has strong personal support from those who voted leave. That's 52% of the electorate,
These figures showing his support among leave voters would seem to vindicate that approach to me
FS misreading polling data because he thinks it supports his position? How surprising.you are mixing up labour members/supporters who voted leave with the part of the general population that voted leave.
I know it was just the labour side of the leave vote, but do you not think it's likely to be indicative to some extent of the level of support for either candidate among the wider leave voting electorate?you are mixing up labour members/supporters who voted leave with the part of the general population that voted leave.
that'd be the bit that should have made it obvious that I was well aware it wasn't a poll of the entire population.hopefully they can be replicated to some degree among UKIP supporters.
not at all.FS misreading polling data because he thinks it supports his position? How surprising.
i'm just pointing out your error. it's not an inconsequential slip of the tongue. start again and show all your working out.I know it was just the labour side of the leave vote, but do you not think it's likely to be indicative to some extent of the level of support for either candidate among the wider leave voting electorate?
I don't really. The 'leave' vote wasn't just one thing - it was made up of various sub-groups with entirely different motivations, hopes and desires. Most tory voters voted leave, but it wouldn't surprise me if tory voters who voted remain held in general more favourable opinions of JC.I know it was just the labour side of the leave vote, but do you not think it's likely to be indicative to some extent of the level of support for either candidate among the wider leave voting electorate?.
It's a common enough form of analysis to extrapolate a result from one section of the population and discuss the likelihood that it also applies to some extent to another section of the population who held similar views on the key issue in question.i'm just pointing out your error. it's not an inconsequential slip of the tongue. start again and show all your working out.