Sweet FA
✪ Three rounds Lord, in my .44 ✪
If you refer to the brilliantly excellent massive SUV 4x4 type motors, then yes.Is it an X5 then?
If you refer to the brilliantly excellent massive SUV 4x4 type motors, then yes.Is it an X5 then?
My boss owns an X5, which I have driven fairly often. I really don't get the appeal of it. Despite his claim of being a very useful car for a family with three young kids, the interior is surprisingly small for such a voluminous car.If you refer to the brilliantly excellent massive SUV 4x4 type motors, then yes.
It is big and safe, for the people inside it, at the expense of those outside it including those in normal sized cars!A friend of mine had an X5 for years. It's a smooth, comfortable, powerful, car. I enjoyed driving it. The driving position is great and it feels big and safe around you. Pointless in London but I'd consider one if I lived in the sticks and needed to ford streams, or just needed a reliable motor to carry a family up and down motorways.
I've been considering a Lexus RX400h as my next car. Not sure yet.
That's a stupid reason not to buy one if it's suitable for other reasons. They're engineered to crumple up to the same standards as any other car. Only a dickhead would avoid buying one because "it gives my occupants an unfair advantage in an accident". And is an SUV any more dangerous to others in an accident than a builders van or large estate car?It is big and safe, for the people inside it, at the expense of those outside it including those in normal sized cars!
corrected for youThat's a stupid reason not to buy one if it's suitable for other reasons. They're engineered to crumple up to the same standards as any other car. Only a dickhead would buy one because "it gives my occupants an unfair advantage in an accident". And is an SUV any more dangerous to others in an accident than a builders van or large estate car? ..
They are significantly more dangerous, because aside from the mass, they're higher and therefore normal cars with crash resistance designed around similar height vehicles come off badly in accidents. Thus it becomes an arms race.That's a stupid reason not to buy one if it's suitable for other reasons. They're engineered to crumple up to the same standards as any other car. Only a dickhead would avoid buying one because "it gives my occupants an unfair advantage in an accident". And is an SUV any more dangerous to others in an accident than a builders van or large estate car?
Stupid argument which could be applied to E Class Merc drivers compared to those in smaller cars, or Mondeo occupants compared to Smart car passengers.
Not the point. Of course there's a disparity in the relative safety of different cars, but in it's natural habitat, out of town, an X5 is also likely to run into something its own size or similar. And it's already an arms race and always has been. A Micra driver mixing it with Bahnhof Strasse and his 2 ton armoured shooting break is going to come second, as would a moped rider hitting the Micra. It's a very easily defeated argument and usually used by those with an agenda against SUVs.They are significantly more dangerous, because aside from the mass, they're higher and therefore normal cars with crash resistance designed around similar height vehicles come off badly in accidents. Thus it becomes an arms race.
If I had to be hit by a car whilst in one, I'd much rather it was something with the same window line. Not sure about as a pedestrian, probably the same.Not the point. Of course there's a disparity in the relative safety of different cars, but in it's natural habitat, out of town, an X5 is also likely to run into something its own size or similar. And it's already an arms race and always has been. A Micra driver mixing it with Bahnhof Strasse and his 2 ton armoured shooting break is going to come second, as would a moped rider hitting the Micra. It's a very easily defeated argument and usually used by those with an agenda against SUVs.
Depends on everything else. I'd rather be hit by an X5 at 30mph than Bahnhoff at 50, and SUV's are generally driven more sedately than sports saloons/estates, etc etc ...If I had to be hit by a car whilst in one, I'd much rather it was something with the same window line.
Probably more comfortable, but, you could say that about water boarding.Think I will stick with my Series 1 with the ragtop and roofsticks over that and my Series 1 looks better than that bloatmobile
Especially the Land Rover bit. Worst car I ever owned by fucking MILES.
Never mind the cost, the pollution is the main reason for not driving them, got rid of mine as soon as the pollution reports started coming out.Friend of mine with an engineering PhD says that diesels are a false economy due to maintenance costs etc. I believe him.
Servicing costs? Drove diesel land rovers for donkeys, oil, grease and filters at regular intervals and the jobs a good'un.Indeed. I've driven older desiels for years now. I've noticed servicing costs to be particularly high and the higher cost per liter is a red herring considering how much more economical they are. Plenty of cars with better performance then my ancient 3 series, but when you look at how much more gas they drink to do it then I'm happy enough. Still plenty quick enough for me at any rate.
They're driven more slowly as they can't get up to speed because there isn't the room on the road...Depends on everything else. I'd rather be hit by an X5 at 30mph than Bahnhoff at 50, and SUV's are generally driven more sedately than sports saloons/estates, etc etc ...
There's far more to it than the height of the vehicles.
Aye, there's a lot of people over at VW telling the US EPA just thatWith all/any due respect to your friend, he/she doesn't know their arse from their elbow.
Hammond, of TG fame had me piss boiling when he drove one of these in the UAE and claimed it to be the first of its kind, LR had a very similar vehicle in production donkeys years ago for airport fire services, a RR six wheel variant if memory serves.
</thread>
Bugger, at first glance thought it was a souped up ferret ARVNot quite... Saudi registered, Lambo engined, Batmobile replica driven by Team Galag on Gumball.
Westminster council has clagged an extra £4 an hour parking for diesels, why don't all citys charge a congestion charge for all and every 4x4 and similar entering their areas?These are fun toys which are of no practical use unlike the range rover sport is not going to be regularly annoying other road users by failing to park or sitting in the middle lane without a clue and then changing lane at the very last moment. Driving that 6 wheel thing through a city is punishment enough for its owner.
Series 2? Looking at the bumper.easily fixed. Hopefully, they are fun to drive as people will be laughing at you.
When you buying your Nissan Leaf then Wellie?I do object to Range Rover Sports, pushing a barn door through the air just confirms that the owner cares not a jot for fuel efficiency, ditto also for BMW M5, Porsche Cayenne & Audi Q whatever. And there is that aspect of if or when I am in an accident me and mine will be fine, it is others that will be killed!
Pics?Think I will stick with my Series 1 with the ragtop and roofsticks over that and my Series 1 looks better than that bloatmobile
Probably more comfortable, but, you could say that about water boarding.
Used to curse all BMWs, Mercedes etc as the worst of all drivers but the real problem is most drivers of mid/upper performance cars are, and I very rarely use the word, utter cunts.They're driven more slowly as they can't get up to speed because there isn't the room on the road...
Range Rover Evoque is probably the apex, there's no mitigating factors in owning that, but BMWs, Audi's etc are more common, so you're more likely to be cut up by one.
Hammond, of TG fame had me piss boiling when he drove one of these in the UAE and claimed it to be the first of its kind, LR had a very similar vehicle in production donkeys years ago for airport fire services, a RR six wheel variant if memory serves.
Best car I ever had, LR Discovery, TDI, had it 16 years from nearly new, 240k on the clock and the engine and gearbox still in reasonable condition but the dreaded 'chassis rust' got her in the end.
Totally agree, replaced the Disco with a Freelander, very nice to drive but mechanically? Heap,of Shyte.Discos do seem well made. Had a Freelander and the engine exploded after 23k miles and again a year later. £13k car sold two years later for £1k.
Land Rover flatly denied there was a problem, mate of mine worked on BBC Watchdog and they did a thing on them, but by then it was too late to get anything back for our piece of shite.
Will never again line Land Rover's pockets with my hard earned.