Where do you live, Monaco?Masarati's seem to have taken pole position as the car of choice for a certain kind of discerning mororised wanker round here recently.
Range Rovers, Audis etc are entry level or a shopping trolley for the wife/girlfriend.
That is the issue with them. That aside they are cheap to run in terms of fuel consumptio, but, because they need more servicing, not cheaper overall. They are more expensive to buy, the fuel, in the UK, is more expensive per litre. It's difficult to see any reason to buy one over an equivalent petrol.What's wrong with diesels? Well other then the pollution thing.
In part it's because they now make cheaper cars. The cheapest Maserati now is a £49k Ghibli or £53k Levante whereas before those came along it was probably an £80k Granturismo.Aberdeen. Some people are still obviously doing ok - or trying too hard to look like it, despite the troubles and contraction in the oil biz and very flash cars have always been one of the ways they show-off.
But yeah, they were rare even here till just a few years ago, now they are getting as common as Porsches.
In part it's because they now make cheaper cars. The cheapest Maserati now is a £49k Ghibli or £53k Levante whereas before those came along it was probably an £80k Granturismo.
Is that just frost on it or paint stripper?
It is a strange car not exactly sure what goes through the mind of someone who buys one.
If anyone thinks that the Range Rover Evoque is the world's greatest arsehole mobile, I bring news - LR have an Evoque convertible in development...
I saw a prototype - and yes, it was in white...
Wow, there'll be a queue of tasteless tossers going round the block for that.
Very community spirited of them to help out in an era of widespread public convenience closures.Noone likes it, but the public will buy it.
Man-baby demographic catered for.mrs NBE says it looks like a pram
The stupidest value for money car could be the Aston cygnet!
Well reasonably recent ones outperform many of their equivalent petrol versions, the fuel cost savings are extreme, they're not significantly more expensive to service, and if you bought one used, chances are someone else has worn the higher initial upfront purchase cost.It's difficult to see any reason to buy one over an equivalent petrol.
Friend of mine with an engineering PhD says that diesels are a false economy due to maintenance costs etc. I believe him.Well reasonably recent ones outperform many of their equivalent petrol versions, the fuel cost savings are extreme, they're not significantly more expensive to service, and if you bought one used, chances are someone else has worn the higher initial upfront purchase cost.
Well reasonably recent ones outperform many of their equivalent petrol versions, the fuel cost savings are extreme, they're not significantly more expensive to service, and if you bought one used, chances are someone else has worn the higher initial upfront purchase cost.
Friend of mine with an engineering PhD says that diesels are a false economy due to maintenance costs etc. I believe him.
Yeah, a lot of misunderstanding of diesel cars now. 10-20 years ago some of what Dess was saying was definitely the case but things have changed massively.Indeed. I've driven older desiels for years now. I've noticed servicing costs to be particularly high and the higher cost per liter is a red herring considering how much more economical they are. Plenty of cars with better performance then my ancient 3 series, but when you look at how much more gas they drink to do it then I'm happy enough. Still plenty quick enough for me at any rate.
Well reasonably recent ones outperform many of their equivalent petrol versions, the fuel cost savings are extreme, they're not significantly more expensive to service, and if you bought one used, chances are someone else has worn the higher initial upfront purchase cost.
Well reasonably recent ones outperform many of their equivalent petrol versions, the fuel cost savings are extreme, they're not significantly more expensive to service, and if you bought one used, chances are someone else has worn the higher initial upfront purchase cost.
The same really. As long as you don't clog the DPF there's not much difference.But how often do you have to service them compared to petrol?
Yeah, a lot of misunderstanding of diesel cars now. 10-20 years ago some of what Dess was saying was definitely the case but things have changed massively.
But how often do you have to service them compared to petrol?