Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it wrong to eat animals that are clever?

tim said:
Are you sure? Most times I've eaten game I've been underwhelmed and I also know that boar taint is a problem that makes much pig meat inedible.Boar taint - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. My asumption is that many of our four-legged friends are rather unpalatable.
Click to expand...
I'm positive, Tim.

Do veggies honestly think that meat eaters eat meat for a laugh and it tastes unpleasant to them?

Don't kid yourselves. It's delicious. We love the taste.

You do realise that not all meat is game, right?
 
DrRingDing said:
Us as a species, on average, globally (with notable exceptions).
Click to expand...

That's one hell of a generalised contention...

You may be right, but I'd like to see you put some meat on the bones of a claim like that (geddit?)

IME most cultures I've lived within do share a superficially similar view regarding meat consumption being a symbol of status...but beyond that they diverge as far as amount, occasion, participants etc, are concerned. I wouldn't be able to to extrapolate an increase in meat consumption in all of these cultures due to increased availability. Indeed if we look at some of the more prosperous cultures where a range of meat is easily and cheaply available (I'm thinking of here, Italy, some Latin American cultures) meat as status symbol becomes more specalised into type of meat (the animal, the cut, the rearing etc.) rather than quantity.

...but I'm conjecturing wildly based on anecdata!
 
DrRingDing et al regarding "redundant food sources" and global distribution etc. I'd just like to share an experience form Zimbabwe. Some friends of mine who live there survived (and helped others survive) the period of empty shelves in the shops - when food simply wasn't arriving into the country - by raising chickens. I visited the chicken "farm". a patch of land just outside Harare. Food is back on the shelves in the supermarkets, but they've kept raising chickens. Ready for when the next time the shops are empty.
 
chilango said:
DrRingDing et al regarding "redundant food sources" and global distribution etc. I'd just like to share an experience form Zimbabwe. Some friends of mine who live there survived (and helped others survive) the period of empty shelves in the shops - when food simply wasn't arriving into the country - by raising chickens. I visited the chicken "farm". a patch of land just outside Harare. Food is back on the shelves in the supermarkets, but they've kept raising chickens. Ready for when the next time the shops are empty.
Click to expand...
yeh. but if the ug99 wipes out the grass what would you feed chickens on?
 
chilango said:
Feeding 7.125 billion people primarily through mass industrialised food production will be significantly harmful to the environment.

Now, if the alternative is famine, then yeah you have to harm the environment.

However I don't believe for a second that all of the food for all of the 7.125 billion people needs to come from industrial methods or even that that is the most efficient way of doing it.
Click to expand...

I reckon if they did it properly they could make enough food for 7bn without harming the environment half as much as they do. The amount of waste through food spoiling, being thrown away, or just the food that people consume not being good for nutrition must be mind blowing globally.
I don't have any science for it, but I don't think that the way that food is mass produced at the moment is a good advert example of industrialization, the percentages of people who aren't getting enough food, even in rich countries is mad
 
chilango said:
That's one hell of a generalised contention...

You may be right, but I'd like to see you put some meat on the bones of a claim like that (geddit?)

IME most cultures I've lived within do share a superficially similar view regarding meat consumption being a symbol of status...but beyond that they diverge as far as amount, occasion, participants etc, are concerned. I wouldn't be able to to extrapolate an increase in meat consumption in all of these cultures due to increased availability. Indeed if we look at some of the more prosperous cultures where a range of meat is easily and cheaply available (I'm thinking of here, Italy, some Latin American cultures) meat as status symbol becomes more specalised into type of meat (the animal, the cut, the rearing etc.) rather than quantity.

...but I'm conjecturing wildly based on anecdata!
Click to expand...

I appreciate I'm winging it.

Regarding meat eating you've reference in the developed world. Meat eating does generally increase with a rise of affluence. This is a spreadsheet with a table on meat consumption from 1961 to 2002. You can see the UK has been fairly stable with it meat consumption, which could reinforce your observation that the population is getting more picky rather consuming more. I would argue that shortly before 1961 meat consumption would have been much less, even if you account for shortages during the war.
 
Skyfallsz said:
I reckon if they did it properly they could make enough food for 7bn without harming the environment half as much as they do. The amount of waste through food spoiling, being thrown away, or just the food that people consume not being good for nutrition must be mind blowing globally.
I don't have any science for it, but I don't think that the way that food is mass produced at the moment is a good advert example of industrialization, the percentages of people who aren't getting enough food, even in rich countries is mad
Click to expand...

And yet you live in and benefit from living in an industrialised society...
 
seventh bullet said:
And yet you live in and benefit from living in an industrialised society...
Click to expand...
I'm not against living in an industrial society, I just think that the way food is produced is not a good example of it

I bet if you got a load of boffins to organise global food distribution then they could feed everyone using half as much energy (or something)
 
Skyfallsz said:
I reckon if they did it properly they could make enough food for 7bn without harming the environment half as much as they do. The amount of waste through food spoiling, being thrown away, or just the food that people consume not being good for nutrition must be mind blowing globally.
I don't have any science for it, but I don't think that the way that food is mass produced at the moment is a good advert example of industrialization, the percentages of people who aren't getting enough food, even in rich countries is mad
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure (again, someone correct me if I'm wrong...) that there's already more than enough food produced and there's a crazy amount of people getting too much food. Distribution is a key problem. But, y'know, capitalism.
 
DotCommunist said:
communism and AI
Click to expand...

Al who?

Al Bundy?

mJv4OSP.jpg
 
artificial intelligence. Something smart enough to track the ebb and flow of production and need and allocate accordingly. on a world scale. A system as complex and ever shifting as weather and no computer can map that accuretly yet either. But has to be a communist AI otherwise we get 'pragmatic' decisions about 600 here starving to save 1500 there.
 
DotCommunist said:
artificial intelligence. Something smart enough to track the ebb and flow of production and need and allocate accordingly. on a world scale. A system as complex and ever shifting as weather and no computer can map that accuretly yet either. But has to be a communist AI otherwise we get 'pragmatic' decisions about 600 here starving to save 1500 there.
Click to expand...

Gotta have someone intelligent and knowledgable enough to know how to do that first before automation. May have a problem there.
 
chilango said:
I'm pretty sure (again, someone correct me if I'm wrong...) that there's already more than enough food produced and there's a crazy amount of people getting too much food. Distribution is a key problem. But, y'know, capitalism.
Click to expand...

There's a paper referenced in a book called 'The real cost of cheap food'. If I remember the stat correctly it states that if meat consumption increases as projected, based on changing diets in much of the developing world, then by 2050 133% of the current grain production will be required to be fed to livestock.

I'll check this if you are interested.
 
fredfelt said:
There's a paper referenced in a book called 'The real cost of cheap food'. If I remember the stat correctly it states that if meat consumption increases as projected, based on changing diets in much of the developing world, then by 2050 133% of the current grain production will be required to be fed to livestock.

I'll check this if you are interested.
Click to expand...


What if the grain was on one side of the river, the people on the other and a KFC on an island in the middle?
 
Spymaster said:
I'm positive, Tim.

Do veggies honestly think that meat eaters eat meat for a laugh and it tastes unpleasant to them?

Don't kid yourselves. It's delicious. We love the taste.

You do realise that not all meat is game, right?
Click to expand...

Yes, I eat meat and I'm not stupid.

No, my point was that we eat stuff that tastes good, and that the fauna that we don't eat probably doesn't; which was my experience when eating pheasant and pigeon.

I was querying the last part of your post no the first bit. Your claim that "just about every animal" tastes good.
 
Combustible said:
Why? Why couldn't a hypothetical future socialist society collectively decide to pursue an industrial farming strategy to maintain or even increase the amount of meat eaten.
Click to expand...

A hypothetical society could do anything. They could turn Mars into a massive farm with talking cows who play chess and if you win you can eat them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

zedr
French Revolutionary Calendar - what are you?
2
Replies
33
Views
779
Fozzie Bear
Fozzie Bear
hitmouse
Immunity, barring from office and all that
Replies
1
Views
179
emanymton
emanymton
ska invita
Government debt, do you understand it?
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
gosub
gosub
T
Reaganomics/Thatcherism is probably the most important influence on global society in the last 35 years.
Replies
8
Views
458
TremulousTetra
T
Protag
'Conservatism' is neoliberalism with spikes
2 3
Replies
77
Views
3K
BigMoaner
BigMoaner
Back
Top Bottom