Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Yeh. That's as incisive a political argument as you're able to construct.LOL! You dumb twat!
Yeh. That's as incisive a political argument as you're able to construct.LOL! You dumb twat!
The difference is, you insult people in an arrogant way without flaming and you make sure you get in there first with the insults, presumably because it makes you feel all clever. I simply responded to that.yeh when in doubt resort to ad hom bullshit. i know your sort, shevek.
The difference is i can put together an argument which stands up to examination and you can't.The difference is, you insult people in an arrogant way without flaming and you make sure you get in there first with the insults, presumably because it makes you feel all clever. I simply responded to that.
Of course your memory of some tweets (feel free to quote them) will be much better than documented legal action and subsequent retraction, apology and payment. You'll be right and the links will be wrong. (otherwise you'd be putting editor in a position where you are repeating allegations that have been confirmed as false against a heavily-funded individual that loves to sue people)He said, as it quotes him saying again in the fucking bit you’ve quoted *the fans* were responsible for the victims deaths. Just as The Sun did years ago.
I saw the tweets.
“and said he had in fact said that other Liverpool fans there on the day “were partly culpable for the deaths of the 96”, not the victims themselves.”Of course your memory of some tweets (feel free to quote them) will be much better than documented legal action and subsequent retraction, apology and payment. You'll be right and the links will be wrong. (otherwise you'd be putting editor in a position where you are repeating allegations that have been confirmed as false against a heavily-funded individual that loves to sue people)
You should contact The Scotsman and explain how they can get their money back - you could get a nice little fee. Urban does remind me of their comments sections sometimes tbh.
You haven't managed this far on this thread. You say you've been exposed to critical thinking but I see no evidence of that. None of your replies to my posts are more than facile. If you'd listened to and thought about Martin's videos you'd not come out with the utter shite you do. Martin did seven or eight videos during last year's general election and if you'd taken on board the points he made you'd not make such a prat of yourself as you have on this thread. The problem isn't the relatively small number of working class tories but the far larger number of working class labour voters, who are the people upon who you should concentrate your persuasive efforts, such as they are. I would suggest you go away and think about things but I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that's not really on the cards.In your opinion
I think about things alot,and I experience life as a poor, working class person. But according to you I'm just thick, then you wonder why people insult you.You haven't managed this far on this thread. You say you've been exposed to critical thinking but I see no evidence of that. None of your replies to my posts are more than facile. If you'd listened to and thought about Martin's videos you'd not come out with the utter shite you do. Martin did seven or eight videos during last year's general election and if you'd taken on board the points he made you'd not make such a prat of yourself as you have on this thread. The problem isn't the relatively small number of working class tories but the far larger number of working class labour voters, who are the people upon who you should concentrate your persuasive efforts, such as they are. I would suggest you go away and think about things but I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that's not really on the cards.
But according to Martin, from what I recall of a past video, he can understand why working class people vote UKIP and states that we shouldn't judge them too harshly for it. But somehow voting Labour is incomprehensible? That doesn't make sense as far as I'm concerned.You haven't managed this far on this thread. You say you've been exposed to critical thinking but I see no evidence of that. None of your replies to my posts are more than facile. If you'd listened to and thought about Martin's videos you'd not come out with the utter shite you do. Martin did seven or eight videos during last year's general election and if you'd taken on board the points he made you'd not make such a prat of yourself as you have on this thread. The problem isn't the relatively small number of working class tories but the far larger number of working class labour voters, who are the people upon who you should concentrate your persuasive efforts, such as they are. I would suggest you go away and think about things but I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that's not really on the cards.
If time after time someone no matter their background says things which do not follow then yes I will conclude sooner or later that maybe they're not that bright. This has no bearing on their wealth or class as anyone who has seen my posts on the current administration will agree.I think about things alot,and I experience life as a poor, working class person. But according to you I'm just thick, then you wonder why people insult you.
I never said people's voting Labour was incomprehensible.But according to Martin, from what I recall of a past video, he can understand why working class people vote UKIP and states that we shouldn't judge them too harshly for it. But somehow voting Labour is incomprehensible? That doesn't make sense as far as I'm concerned.
Isn't that the neo-liberals in the party though?
Who *introduced* uni tuition fees?
Who pfi'd all the hospitals?
Who is knocking down social housing more than the tories?
Right not the real labour party, I seeIsn't that the neo-liberals in the party though?
You implied it and Martin doesn't seem to understand it eitherI never said people's voting Labour was incomprehensible.
Well that's my understanding of it, I could well be wrong. I don't think I've seen anyone on the left in the party supporting it though, or doing it.Right not the real labour party, I see
Jesus Mary and Joseph where did I imply it?You implied it and Martin doesn't seem to understand it either
Get fucked you condescending arsehole!If time after time someone no matter their background says things which do not follow then yes I will conclude sooner or later that maybe they're not that bright. This has no bearing on their wealth or class as anyone who has seen my posts on the current administration will agree.
Have you seen anyone like John McDonnell, Jeremy Corbyn or anyone else out of the campaign group saying Labour councils should stop knocking down estates to make way for yuppie flats?Well that's my understanding of it, I could well be wrong. I don't think I've seen anyone on the left in the party supporting it though, or doing it.
If you can explain in any other way why time after time you say I've said something I haven't, I'd be interested to hear it.Get fucked you condescending arsehole!
Yes, yes it is.This is a waste of my time
But according to Martin, from what I recall of a past video, he can understand why working class people vote UKIP and states that we shouldn't judge them too harshly for it. But somehow voting Labour is incomprehensible? That doesn't make sense as far as I'm concerned.
Do you think that in real life your ascending to insults will influence people in the way you desire?Cunt!