Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is America burning? (Black Lives Matter protests, civil unrest and riots 2020)


In an aggressive and indiscriminate arrest sweep on Sunday, police stormed a music festival held in the Atlanta forest by activists protesting Cop City, a vast police training facility under construction atop forestland. Twenty-three of the activists arrested in the raid now face domestic terrorism charges for their participation in the Defend the Atlanta Forest movement.
The protesters are alleged to have participated in acts of vandalism and arson at a Cop City construction site over a mile away from the music festival location and over an hour before the arrest raid took place. They have all been charged under Georgia’s domestic terror statute, though none of the arrest warrants tie any of the defendants directly to any illegal acts.
The probable cause stated in the warrants against the activists is extremely weak. Police cited arrestees having mud on their shoes — in a forest. The warrants alleged they had written a legal support phone number on their arms, as is common during mass protests. And, in a few cases, police alleged protesters were holding shields — hardly proof of illegal activity — which a number of defendants even deny.
This is just the latest incident of law enforcement and prosecutorial overreach against the abolitionist, environmentalist movement in Atlanta, an absurd attempt to establish guilt by association, as the flimsy arrest warrants make clear.
At a hearing for arrestees on Tuesday, 22 activists were denied bond outright. One defendant, a Georgia-based attorney who was arrested while acting as a designated legal observer for the National Lawyers Guild during Sunday’s events, was released on $5,000 bond.
“We haven’t seen a charge for arson or interference with government property,” said Eli Bennett, the attorney for several defendants, describing the arrest warrants during Tuesday’s bond hearing. “The state has no evidence,” he said, adding that Georgia’s domestic terrorism statute is “laughably unconstitutional.”
A total of 42 participants in the Stop Cop City struggle now face state domestic terror charges, as 19 individuals were previously hit with the same charges in the last two months on equally weak grounds. At the end of January, during a multi-agency police raid on the forest encampment, cops shot dead 26-year-old Manuel “Tortuguita” Terán, marking a grim escalation in repression against a movement that has shown impressive resilience in its two years of mobilizing against Cop City.
Now, on the most tenuous claims of vicarious liability, multiple forest defenders face up to 35 years in prison if found guilty of domestic terrorism.
“It’s collective punishment. The police are trying to establish a de-facto norm that anyone who associates with a political movement will be attacked and charged for the actions of any other supporter of that movement,” said Marlon Kautz, an Atlanta-based organizer with the Atlanta Solidarity Fund, which provides bail funds and legal support to protesters targeted for involvement in social movements, including against Cop City.
“As a law enforcement strategy, it’s utterly incompetent and ignorant of how the law works. But as a strategy for repressing a political movement it makes a lot of sense,” Kautz told me. “Convincing activists and prospective activists that they will be held criminally responsible for the actions of other supporters of their movement can have the effect of pitting activists against each other.”
 
Autopsy reveals anti-'Cop City' activist's hands were raised when shot and killed
A second autopsy of an environmental activist who was shot and killed by the Georgia State Patrol on Jan. 18 shows their hands were raised when they were killed, lawyers for their family say. The full autopsy report will be released at a press conference Monday.

The 26-year-old protester, Manuel Esteban Paez Terán, was killed in an Atlanta-area forest while police cleared an encampment of activists who oppose the construction of Atlanta's "Cop City" — or Public Training Safety Facility. Terán went by Tortuguita.

"Both Manuel's left and right hands show exit wounds in both palms. The autopsy further reveals that Manuel was most probably in a seated position, cross-legged when killed," lawyers said in a press release.

Last month, Tortuguita's family said they were shot at least a dozen times.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation says officers killed Tortuguita in self-defense after they shot a state trooper, but the City of Atlanta released videos in which an officer suggests the trooper may have been injured by friendly fire.

The Atlanta Police Department said that the "officers had no immediate knowledge of the events at the shooting site" before making their comments, and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said that officer's speculation is not evidence.

Tortuguita's family has sued for the release of more information under the Georgia Open Records Act, the press release says.

"Imagine the police killed your child. And now then imagine they won't tell you anything. That is what we are going through," Belkis Terán, Tortuguita's mother, said in a statement.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation hasn't released the government's autopsy report or met with Tortuguita's family, and it blocked the City of Atlanta from releasing more video evidence. It has said there's no body camera or dashcam footage of the shooting, and that ballistics evidence shows the bullet that injured the trooper came from a gun belonging to Tortuguita.
 
Inside the New Right's Next Frontier: The American West
Vanity Fair February 21, 2023
According to this view, the American empire is in danger of fading, weakened by a greedy and insulated oligarchy with more loyalty to their pals in London and Tokyo than to their fellow Americans. The elite have driven regular people into a serflike existence, putting money above every other source of value or meaning: national interest, local cultures, our long-term financial stability, even the environment. (Many young conservatives have suddenly adopted an almost mystical reverence for nature, itself a form of protest against our money- and tech-driven world.) The result is that now a lot of highly online coastal elites talk in much the same way that backwoods militiamen arming themselves against the new world order have been for decades. And vice versa.

Just before I left for Wyoming, a Substack post by a writer who tweets under the name Disgraced Propagandist titled “There’s Gonna Be a War in Montana” went viral. A dozen acquaintances sent it to me, including my editor at Vanity Fair. The writer explicitly linked the anti-globalist analysis to an anger that’s been swirling in the American West over the land rush engendered by well-off coastal buyers, which has sent rents and home prices spaceward, forcing people to move away or become homeless. Longtime locals talk about being “colonized” by a flood of rich liberal newcomers.

“On one side you have global interests imputing their values, importing cheaper labor, hollowing out Montana’s attractions and selling them to an international bourgeoisie for maximum profits,” went the post. “On the other side you have the new underclass. Not the friendly Christian country folk of times past. And not Cowboy Hat Republican Rancher Dad either. No, these are a new kind of country person. Angry, exasperated, poor,” he wrote. “This group is acutely aware of just who controls Bozeman and Big Sky, and believe that the same people are coming for their territory. And they’re right.”
Not sure if this is already posted? Falls into the stupid horseshoe theory. Worth a read nonetheless.
 
An interview with a participant in the recent Atlanta forest festivities:
 

Texas Governor Greg Abbott said on Saturday he is seeking the pardon of an Uber driver convicted of murder a day earlier in the July 2020 shooting death of a man at a Black Lives Matter protest in downtown Austin, the state capital.

Abbott, in a post on Twitter, said he will pardon Daniel Perry, 37, a U.S. Army sergeant, as soon as a request from the parole board "hits my desk."

The Republican governor noted that he can grant pardons only on the recommendation of the state's Board of Pardons and Paroles, but that he is allowed to request pardons...

Perry was convicted of murder after the jury deliberated for 17 hours in the eight-day trial, according to media accounts.

“I will work as swiftly as Texas law allows regarding the pardon of Sgt. Perry,” Abbott wrote on Twitter.

“Texas has one of the strongest ‘Stand your ground’ laws of self-defense that cannot be nullified by a jury or progressive district attorney," he said. "Additionally, I have already prioritized reining in rogue District Attorneys, and the Texas Legislature is working on laws to achieve that goal."
 
This is just outrageous:


Grim stuff indeed - separate thread on it here:

 
May be old news now, but the last of the MOVE 9 only got out last year: Chuck Sims Africa freed: final jailed Move 9 member released from prison
Mike Africa Jnr (who was born in prison) is attempting to buy back the house Philly police bombed, and which the city then took over as a police sub-station(!) using eminent domain:

 

Early on Wednesday morning, police officers from the Atlanta Police Department and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation raided the Teardown House, a hub for a constellation of organizing activity in East Atlanta. At least a dozen officers in riot gear, wielding assault rifles, arrested three organizers from the Atlanta Solidarity Fund, a nonprofit that supports people who are arrested for protest or activism. The Solidarity Fund pays bail, provides jail support, and refers people who have been arrested to available lawyers. In other words, the Solidarity Fund connects people who are still presumed innocent to things that they are legally entitled to: the ability to have others pay their bail and a lawyer to represent them in court.

As a collective of people who post bail for strangers, the Atlanta Solidarity Fund is one of nearly a hundred organized bail funds around the country. These community bail funds share a sense that the state should not be subjecting people to the violence of jail simply because they cannot pay their bail. More essentially, bail funds understand that one powerful way to push back against the injustice of pretrial detention is to join together in the act of paying bail for strangers...

The three Solidarity Fund organizers arrested this week—Marlon Kautz, Adele Maclean, and Savannah Patterson—have been initially charged with the felony crimes of charity fraud and money laundering. Georgia officials are not hiding the underlying theory of these prosecutions: that to be part of a group supporting protesters is, itself, a crime.
 
The three organisers are all now out on bail, the judge is "saying he did not find the prosecution’s case, at least for now, “real impressive.”":
A judge on Friday granted bond for three activists involved in supporting the protest against a planned police and fire training center in Atlanta that opponents have derisively dubbed “Cop City.”

Adele MacLean, 42, Marlon Scott Kautz, 39, and Savannah Patterson, 30, were arrested Wednesday on charges of charities fraud and money laundering. They lead the Atlanta Solidarity Fund, which has provided bail money and helped find attorneys for arrested protesters.

Prosecutors had asked Magistrate Court Judge James Altman to deny bond. But Altman granted $15,000 bond to each of the activists, expressing concerns about their free speech rights and saying he did not find the prosecution’s case, at least for now, “real impressive.” That bond was to be subject to various conditions that Altman planned to outline in a written order later Friday.

The office of state Attorney General Chris Carr is leading the prosecution. A spokesperson for Carr in an email characterized the arrests and the search of a home owned by MacLean and Kautz as “a multi-agency effort and part of an ongoing investigation into violent activity at the site of the future Atlanta Public Safety Training Center and other locations.”

Deputy Attorney General John Fowler argued against bond, saying the activists are flight risks and pose a danger to the community.

“On its face, it appears to be laudable, it appears to be lawful,” he said of their nonprofit, noting that they run a bail fund and a food fund. But he said investigators have found that the activists “harbor extremist anti-government and anti-establishment views and not all of the money goes to what they say that it goes to.”

Fowler said some of the money has been used to fund violent acts against people and property around the city of Atlanta. He cited an attack on Georgia's Department of Public Safety headquarters in July 2020, vandalism at Ebenezer Baptist Church in January 2022, and protests related to the planned training center that turned violent.

Defense attorney Don Samuel said Fowler was engaging in hyperbole and that none of the three is accused of having participated in violent behavior.

“The fact that what you do happens to help some people do bad things doesn't mean that you're guilty of joining in a conspiracy with them," Samuel said. "It doesn't mean that the action that you've taken, even if it facilitates misconduct, is something that renders you culpable.”
 
Useful bit of background here, I wasn't familiar with the time an oil company tried to get Greenpeace done on racketeering charges:
Corporations and police have repeatedly used RICO charges to intimidate perceived adversaries. For example, from 2016 to 2019, Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, brought RICO charges against the well-known nonprofit organization Greenpeace. Greenpeace ultimately succeeded in quashing these absurd charges.

It’s worth reading the verbiage of the original charges against Greenpeace in full, as it shows how lawyers and PR firms serving the interests of corporations and police will misrepresent even the most milquetoast nonprofit organizations as criminal cartels.

For example, the original criminal complaint against Greenpeace alleges that:

  1. Over several decades, certain once legitimate not-for-profit groups have been corrupted by money raised from individuals and a network of foundations and special interests willing to “contribute” to advance their own political or business agendas. More recently, many smaller, more violent eco-terrorist organizations and radicalized individuals have begun exploiting the same lucrative business model using the proliferation of web-based fundraising tools to make money, much of which is diverted for personal gain and not used to further any environmental cause.
  2. In its simplest form, this model has two components: (1) manufacturing a media spectacle based upon phony but emotionally charged hot-button issues, sensational lies, and intentionally incited physical violence, property destruction, and other criminal conduct; and (2) relentlessly publicizing these sensational lies, manufactured conflict and conflagration, and misrepresented “causes” to generate funding from individual donors, foundations, and corporate sponsors. These putative “environmental” groups accept grants and other consideration from foundations and special business interests who use the groups’ environmental mantle to advance their own ulterior agendas.
  3. The market leader among purported international not-for-profits is a network called “Greenpeace.” The Greenpeace network has fraudulently induced people throughout the United States and the world into donating millions of dollars based on materially false and misleading claims about its misrepresented environmental purpose and the sham “campaigns” it mounts against targeted companies, projects, or causes.

Anyone who is familiar with the actual track record of Greenpeace—a legalistic nonprofit—will recognize how preposterous these allegations are. One could certainly accuse Greenpeace of directing funds away from more effective uses in the struggle against ecological devastation, but the idea that they might do so illegally is laughable. Likewise, if anyone is making “materially false and misleading claims,” it is the corporations and government institutions seeking to inflict damage on the natural environment for the sake of profiteering and police militarization—not environmental activists.

Despite the considerable financial power and state support of the corporation that brought these charges, the courts were compelled to conclude the matter in favor of Greenpeace. When we see police and prosecutors use similar language to misrepresent the defendants in Atlanta, we should bear in mind how readily they employ such smear campaigns.

Just like the charges against the J20 defendants and the RICO charges against Greenpeace, the charges against the three legal support organizers in Atlanta are hasty and poorly thought-out attempts to bully activists. To begin with the pettiest indication of this, the warrants for the three arrestees contain multiple typographical errors:

  1. RECORDS AND REPORTS OF CERTAIN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS
  2. FRAUDULENT, MISREPRESESNTING [sic], OR MISLEADING ACTIVITIES REGARDING CHARITABLE SOLITATIONS [sic] PER 43-17-12

More significantly, the affidavit (which a careless judge seems to have dated “May 25, 2024”) alleges that the arrestees used funds for “various expenses such as gasoline, forest clean-up, totes, covid rapid tests, media, yard signs, and other miscellaneous expenses.” If this is their grounds for “money laundering” and “charity fraud,” this case is no stronger than the case against Greenpeace was.
 
Useful bit of background here, I wasn't familiar with the time an oil company tried to get Greenpeace done on racketeering charges:
looks like a case of Lawfare - Wikipedia...using the law to entangle your opponent however ridiculous the attempt
 
Interstate 95 is the main north-south highway on the East Coast and stretches from Florida through Maine to Canada.


Shocking but not entirely sure what to do with the protests, civil unrest and riots
 
Fuck me this thread is grim reading. One page is enough. Humanity fucking stinks at times.
 
Useful bit of background here, I wasn't familiar with the time an oil company tried to get Greenpeace done on racketeering charges:
Of tangential, historical interest, detailed review of the autobiography of a self-described British private sector infiltrator, specialising in state- and corporate-directed spying on civil society groups, including stints in Greenpeace UK and International:

 
Of tangential, historical interest, detailed review of the autobiography of a self-described British private sector infiltrator, specialising in state- and corporate-directed spying on civil society groups, including stints in Greenpeace UK and International:


good first line.
 
Back
Top Bottom