Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is America burning? (Black Lives Matter protests, civil unrest and riots 2020)

This but the trump regime has been telling people that Antifa is something like a clearly defined enemy with badges and everything for years now.
The woman who wrote that tweet thinks she can recognise and count them in a crowd
View attachment 215521


but I don’t know what method she uses for that, basically don’t know what the word means to her.
I think trump knows it’s not actually a real thing the way he’s been painting it (singular org with masses ranks taking orders probably from soros etc) has just found it very useful to conjure .
Antifa means all things to all people tbh even their own . The original tweet she retweeted came from a person with a somewhat dubious reputation tbh. The outside influences line wont have legs tbh I've even seen HK protestors blamed . Wouldn't be surprised if 'Liverpool Pat' is sighted at some point
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ax^
It really did take off after Iraq though, with so much military surplus being deliberately funnelled to the cops.
During Iraq perhaps more than after Iraq. But there's a longer history there extending back through the 1990s and Clinton whereas the idea this only started under Bush II rather lets the sainted bill off the hook
 
The outside influences line wont have legs tbh
not sure what you mean there. The presidents supporters all seem to believe there are no ‘real’ protests going on just ‘antifa’ troublemakers behind it all. Otherwise you’d have to look and see there’s a massive problem in your country wouldn’t you.
And on the other side everybody is talking about outside influence of various kinds too.
 
During Iraq perhaps more than after Iraq. But there's a longer history there extending back through the 1990s and Clinton whereas the idea this only started under Bush II rather lets the sainted bill off the hook

Much of this 'equipment' (which is what we're talking about) was made possible for individual police forces to buy due to the obscene money to be made from arrests in the War on Drugs. Which is handy. For them.
 
People always talk about 'outside influences' in riots and the like. As if they'd be ok if it was just locals ripping things up. Where that line falls down here is, as someone mentioned earlier, when we consider these actions are taking place across 25 states (and counting). "Yeah, er, they all came from that non-rioting Wyoming" (with apologies to Wyoming if you're rioting, I'm having trouble keeping up).
 
People always talk about 'outside influences' in riots and the like. As if they'd be ok if it was just locals ripping things up. Where that line falls down here is, as someone mentioned earlier, when we consider these actions are taking place across 25 states (and counting). "Yeah, er, they all came from that non-rioting Wyoming" (with apologies to Wyoming if you're rioting, I'm having trouble keeping up).
It's a pretty standard divide and rule tactic yeah. The message is "this isn't your fellow citizens, this is outsiders doing this who are not one of you, don't feel any association with them".

As usual it is toilet - there are all sorts of odd folk coming down to various places and doing odd things but the vast majority of people on the streets are local.
 
not sure what you mean there. The presidents supporters all seem to believe there are no ‘real’ protests going on just ‘antifa’ troublemakers behind it all. Otherwise you’d have to look and see there’s a massive problem in your country wouldn’t you.
And on the other side everybody is talking about outside influence of various kinds too.

I havent seen much evidence of 'the other side' claims aside from the presence of small numbers of right wingers and kids travelling to loot. The outsiders claim is wheeled out during every riot though isn't it. ? The arrest figures and their adresses nornally give some idea of the extent of this.
 
Much of this 'equipment' (which is what we're talking about) was made possible for individual police forces to buy due to the obscene money to be made from arrests in the War on Drugs. Which is handy. For them.

I thought they got handed the military surplus kit for free. Like some piddly little force in Assfuck, Nowhere getting given APCs kinda thing.
 
I thought they got handed the military surplus kit for free. Like some piddly little force in Assfuck, Nowhere getting given APCs kinda thing.

It seems you are correct. There is, however, a connection.

For example, to secure equipment through the 1033 program, law enforcement agencies send applications directly to state coordinators in each jurisdiction. This allows local law enforcement agencies to acquire the military equipment, purchased with federal tax dollars, without any appropriate oversight by state lawmakers or local city officials. The current structure of the 1033 program allows law enforcement agencies to circumvent the traditional principles of federalism and avoid the appropriations process meant to protect citizens from excessive government spending.

Furthermore, regulations that accompany the receipt of property under the 1033 program create perverse incentives for local law enforcement agencies to ensure they are able to retain the property for their department’s use. First, police must use any property acquired through the program within one year of receipt, otherwise they must return it to the Department of Defense. Second, law enforcement agencies are responsible for all of the transportation, maintenance, and conversion costs of this equipment. Although the initial zero cost for the equipment may be appealing, the insurance, fuel, storage, training, and cost to convert the equipment for law enforcement’s use can be extremely high. In some instances, these costs are too expensive for many jurisdictions to justify retaining the equipment if it is not being used on a frequent basis. This creates an incentive for the agency to utilize the equipment in circumstances where it may not appropriate or reasonably necessary simply to justify its retention by the agency. It also encourages police to shift resources away from catching individuals who are the largest threat to public safety to activities that will reap financial benefits for the department through civil asset forfeiture or seizure of property associated with low-level drug possession.
 
Back
Top Bottom