Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

IRA officially decommissions arms

tobyjug said:
............and bigoted about drug trafficking,

you want to be carefull. Now that the IRA are virtually legal, the days of allegeing any old nonsense because nobody gives a shit, are over.

Remember the Daily Mail spent almost ten years and a big pile of money trying to prove the IRA were involved in drug trafficking and eventually proved .............................nothing!

Can you imagine how pissed off you would be, if you were sued by the IRA and they won?

john x
 
fanta said:
I really admire the way you say 'ra' in stead of IRA Cemy.

It is so clever, sophisticated and cool.

Makes you come across as incredibly intellectual - which of course you are anyway.
And your propensity for posting flippant sarcasm badly disguised as satirical wit makes you what?


Newton Emerson you are not.
 
McIntyre is casting PIRA decomissioning as a surrender.
If there is any point in fighting a war, it lies not in fighting one that cannot be won. Sometimes surrender is the only feasible option. Pride alone should not stand in the way of lives being spared and misery avoided. The degree to which surrender is ignominious is determined by the quality of the conditions won by the losing side. People must make their up own minds on the conditions secured by the Adams leadership in return for its surrender to the British state objective of an internal Northern Ireland solution.
He's right of course, outright victory is an unusual outcome in war, terms are sought and bargains are made. But surrender is a loaded word in Belfast and the wrong one here. There's been a long and painful giving up, an evolved resignation that other ways are better. The Provos have finally put the pike in the thatch, its a brave and hopeful act.
 
cemertyone said:
and when challenged on anything else reverts to coy humour.......that old unionist trick eh?????

Is that aimed at me or fanta in regards to 'coy humour' and when being 'challenged'? :confused:
 
Anyway...being humourous is not something I'd associate with Ulster Unionism which seems to have such a po-faced image about it.
 
john x said:
Can you imagine how pissed off you would be, if you were sued by the IRA and they won?

john x

I would love them to sue, I am not the daily mail, if it came to a court case, in camera in court which is the only way the evidence can be given that they were drug traffickers is eminently proveable.
 
tobyjug said:
I would love them to sue, I am not the daily mail, if it came to a court case, in camera in court which is the only way the evidence can be given that they were drug traffickers is eminently proveable.

I can see it now. All going smoothly until the judge tells you that fantasy is not admissable as evidence and the next thing you're writing out a big fat cheque for Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness.

Weeping you'll be, take my word for it! :(

john x
 
Did anyone see that despatches programme the other week?
About the Northern Bank job.
I thought it was pretty anti-SF.
I was waiting for a bombshell that showed that Martin and Gerry were involved and then... nothing.
I think they were asked on to the programme right enough but declined. Probably because there was no case to answer.
 
john x said:
I can see it now. All going smoothly until the judge tells you that fantasy is not admissable as evidence and the next thing you're writing out a big fat cheque for Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness.

Weeping you'll be, take my word for it! :(

john x

Fantasy it most certainly isn't, it isn't evidence available to a newspaper.
 
Dilzybhoy said:
I think they were asked on to the programme right enough but declined. Probably because there was no case to answer.

I think that you're right.

No case at all.

The very idea that the IRA, sorry, the RA would do something as wicked as rob a bank is absurd and stupid. They're good boys who only ever hurt their own kind and love their mums or something like that.

Every fucker knows that.
 
belief does-not equal fact.

DexterTCN said:
The greatest step forward in Irish/British diplomacy in 100 years?

And what kind of backlash can we expect?

Can you provide me with any kinda substantial evidence to back-up your claim that the provos have 'de-commissioned' all their weaponry?

Infact, can you provide me with any kinda proof that they have decommissioned at all?

:rolleyes:
 
tobyjug said:
I would love them to sue, I am not the daily mail, if it came to a court case, in camera in court which is the only way the evidence can be given that they were drug traffickers is eminently proveable.


Fuck me how i laughed at that one.. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: that is with out doubt the MOST PREPOSPERIOUS thing i have heard in a long time.....
So British intelligence could never prove any allegations..
The right-wing press could never prove any allegations.
The Irish press could never prove any allegations
Interpol could not..
The FBI and the CIA could not.....BUT BEHOLD TOBY has got the killer information that every ones been waiting on for 25 years.....
your imagination is starting to get the better of you son...lay of that cider for a while me thinks....
 
tobyjug said:
Fantasy it most certainly isn't, it isn't evidence available to a newspaper.


Gossh now its getting into the world of " hidden" evidence the tension mounts :rolleyes: ..tell me our kid have you been lurking around the door ways of Beachmount Avenue to gather this intelligence i wonder...and would your presense not arouse suspision.....
YOUR so very funny.... ;)
 
Oh Toby you have gone all quite ( which isn`t like you at all!) i even thought you where going to " Do a Fanta" and regal us with some witty aside but no there`s been complete SILENCE on the claims you have made and the " evidence" you have (and it would appear you alone, have into the bargin, goosh what a scoop for the Mail you have on your hands. Why don`t you kill two birds with one stone and publish your devestating critc of the provo`s drug trafficking and make some money into the bargin???.The wire services of ALL the international media entities will be offering you MILLIONS for the info you have...but no you have decided to keep mum)
Now i`m begining to suspect YOU are an under cover provo.....you naughty little rebel...
 
cemertyone said:
Gossh now its getting into the world of " hidden" evidence the tension mounts :rolleyes: ..tell me our kid have you been lurking around the door ways of Beachmount Avenue to gather this intelligence i wonder...and would your presense not arouse suspision.....
YOUR so very funny.... ;)

shouldn't that be Beechmount Avenue?
yeah, ok i'm a pedant, but....
 
cemertyone said:
Oh Toby you have gone all quite ..

All quite what? Just because a newspaper can't get hold of any evidence doesn't mean there isn't any.
There is not a terrorist organisation on the planet that isn't funded partly or wholly by drug trafficking. The IRA is no different.
 
fanta said:
I think that you're right.

No case at all.

The very idea that the IRA, sorry, the RA would do something as wicked as rob a bank is absurd and stupid. They're good boys who only ever hurt their own kind and love their mums or something like that.

Every fucker knows that.
I wasn't talking about the "RA", was I, you silly little boy?
I was talking about SF.
 
tobyjug said:
All quite what? Just because a newspaper can't get hold of any evidence doesn't mean there isn't any.
There is not a terrorist organisation on the planet that isn't funded partly or wholly by drug trafficking. The IRA is no different.

this is turning into a Kafa novel......so put up some (any) evidence that supports your claim that the IRA has profited from or is involved in or gains money from the drug trade....simple really if you have it (as you allege you do) then show the rest of the world...some how i doubt very much you even have one iota of "evidence"... You can repeat this nonsense all day long and NO ONE hear will believe a single sentence that you write.....
 
Dilzybhoy said:
I wasn't talking about the "RA", was I, you silly little boy?
I was talking about SF.

And they are two very different things with no over-lapping aspects whatsover at all, oh yes sirree-bob nothing at all is remotely similar about them at all nothing, nowt not a sausage...ra ra rasputin... :eek:

Tit.
 
fanta said:
And they are two very different things with no over-lapping aspects whatsover at all, oh yes sirree-bob nothing at all is remotely similar about them at all nothing, nowt not a sausage...ra ra rasputin... :eek:

Tit.


Oh gods its our very own Woddy Allen.... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: with another insightful and remarkable analysis on events in the region. Why don`t you just give up and try out a the commedy store with the rest of the hopefuls...
 
fanta said:
And they are two very different things with no over-lapping aspects whatsover at all, oh yes sirree-bob nothing at all is remotely similar about them at all nothing, nowt not a sausage...ra ra rasputin... :eek:

Tit.

I would admit they are all part of the same movement i.e. the Provisional Republican Movement consisting of Sinn Fein, Ogra Sinn Fein and PIRA but to say they are the same thing is not really insightful. Could you imagine Mary Lou McDonald mixing fertilizer with slab :eek: :D
 
well of course the provos and sinn fein are seprate organisations, kinda like the Foreign Office and the MOD, :rolleyes:
 
Jesus wept!#
I know your not that thick so I'll assume your taking the pish.

I'll indulge you for now.
The Foreign office did not know about the torture and murder of innocent Iraqi's.
If they did they should be charged. Innit.
The MOD maybe knew. I don't have any evidence so can't say.

Just like you, Fanta and revol, have no evidence to say the Sinn Féin leadership knew about the robbery beforehand. So shut the fuck up.
Twats!!!
 
Dilzybhoy said:
Just like you, Fanta and revol, have no evidence to say the Sinn Féin leadership knew about the robbery beforehand. So shut the fuck up. Twats!!!

And yet another teddy is thrown out of the cot...
 
tantrum,0.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom