Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Insurance company CEO assassinated in New York

Murder is defined as unlawfully and unjustifiably killing a person. It could be argued that the killing was absolutely justified, in order to save the lives of others. It's definitely a defence I'd consider if I was on the jury.
A modern day version of the 'trolley problem' - do you kill one CEO of an American healthcare company, which has been under investigation for the inexplicable increase of its prior approval denial rate, in order to get the company to replace that CEO ans perhaps change its policies/denial rate, in order to save the lives of many people who are insured by that company?
 
He's only been charged with second-degree murder so far - under New York law, a first-degree murder charge would require one of these aggravating factors:

View attachment 454428

They might be able to make a terrorism allegation stick but not sure how hard prosecutors will push for it, if you're going to gun down a CEO, Manhattan might be one of the better jurisdictions to do so in


New York is a right wet-banket of a state and Manhattan these days feels like the absolute safest place in the whole of the US, everyone's too stoned to do shit, you could walk down 1st Ave in a suit made of Benjamins and no one would fucking touch ya. And then go and buy a bunch of THC rich gummies for Spymaster to munch on...
 
There's no way I'd convict if I were on the jury. A clear case of self defense.
I'd be doing my absolute best to convince the rest of the jury that his death was not only justifiable, but absolutely necessary. I'd be pulling out stats to show how many people died, needlessly, as a direct result of his actions.
Justifiable homicide isn't murder. It doesn't matter if the law says he's guilty, it matters what the jury says. Their decision is final. They can't be punished for it and the judge can't overrule a not guilty verdict. O.J. Simpson was a classic example.
As slim a chance as it might be, I'm holding out hope that the jury acquits him and sends a strong message to his successor.
The guy's a hero, in my book.
 
You can't see his face in the shooting video, maybe it was some other guy with a very similar jacket, shoes, gun, and manifesto - sorry prosecutors, you have failed to convince me beyond a reasonable doubt

It's fairly blatantly him. I mean he had a handwritten document on him naming the company specifically, 10k in cash, various fake IDsm an identical gun to the one used. But... finding 12 jurors who have not been fucked over by the insurance system, that's a different story.
 
He's been kicking off on his way back into court. This is gonna be an entertaining trial.

Luigi Mangione suffered a violent meltdown as he arrived at court after being arrested for the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Mangione, 26, could be heard roaring about cops being 'completely out of touch' and 'insulting the intelligence of the American people' as he was bundled into court by a horde of sheriff's deputies.
 
A modern day version of the 'trolley problem' - do you kill one CEO of an American healthcare company, which has been under investigation for the inexplicable increase of its prior approval denial rate, in order to get the company to replace that CEO ans perhaps change its policies/denial rate, in order to save the lives of many people who are insured by that company?

I doubt the new CEO will be any different. They'll just spend more of other people's money on close protection goons.
 
I think he's almost certainly going to be some kind of maladjusted fuckwit.

He shot the shit out of someone in the street.
It’s far more civilised, or to use your word, adjusted, instead to deny treatment to sick people in order to increase profits.

In the long run they will be dead anyway; like the little-mourned breadhead whose shit was shot in the street
 
Back
Top Bottom